JOÃO ABEL DE FREITAS

 .

China: a grande distância

na qualidade de visão

A grande vantagem chinesa situa-se no imenso capital humano. A China é quem forma anualmente mais engenheiros no Mundo. Por outro lado, regista-se um retorno à China de quadros dos EUA, altamente especializados e com vasta experiência na área da IA.

𝟣. 𝖠 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 “𝖥𝖺́𝖻𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖬𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈” 𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 “𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗂𝖽𝖺” 𝗇𝗈 𝖮𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗋𝖺́𝗉𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗆ı́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺́𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗋ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗎, 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂, 𝗇𝗈 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖠𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖠𝖲𝖯𝖨, 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝟩𝟦 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗋ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝟨𝟨 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠 𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝟪, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖾̂𝗌, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌, 𝖺 𝖨𝖠.

𝖤𝗆 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗆ı́𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺, 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖿𝗋𝗎𝗍𝖺, 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆, 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖬𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈.

𝟤. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺 𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝗍𝖾́𝖼𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈-𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍ı́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈, 𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗅 (𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅, 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍ı́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈) 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋-𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌, 𝗇𝗈 𝖯𝖺ı́𝗌, 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺, 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖮𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗆𝖺𝗌, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝖻𝖾𝗆 “𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗂𝗎𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌”, 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗓𝖺́-𝗅𝗈𝗌.

𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗈𝖻𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟢𝟢%. 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗆ı́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗈𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗑𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝖿ı́𝖼𝗂𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺 𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌.

𝖮 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋ı́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋, “𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖾̂𝗌”.

𝖤𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 – 𝖢𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅

𝟥. 𝖤𝗆 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖬𝖺𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟨, 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗂𝗎 𝟦.𝟢𝟣𝟢 𝖦𝖶.

𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝗎́𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋. 𝖭𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾, 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖺, 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺, Í𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺, 𝖩𝖺𝗉𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖱𝗎́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺.

𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗅𝗂, 𝖿𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗂 𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖥𝗎𝗂 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖠𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺 (𝖠𝖨𝖤).

𝖳𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝟨𝟤% 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖺, 𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺, 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 (𝖾𝗈́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋) 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝗎𝖼𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟢, 𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝟤𝟧%.

𝖲𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗈 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗌𝖺, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠, 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖭𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝖾𝗈́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 (𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈). 𝖤́ 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 “𝗀𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆” 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠: 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈 𝖻𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈. 𝖬𝖺𝗌, 𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖾 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗆, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗍𝖺𝗑𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗈́ 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗆, 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈-𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌. 𝖤 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈?! 𝟦. 𝖢𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈-𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝟤𝟢𝟥𝟢/𝟤𝟢𝟥𝟧, 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝗎, 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖤𝖴𝖠 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈̃𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆, 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗇𝗎́𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗎𝖼𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝟤𝟢𝟥𝟧 (𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟧𝟢, 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝟥𝟨 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝟣𝟨 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾), 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗈́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌.

𝖮𝗋𝖺, 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗀𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗆ı́𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖠𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 (𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺, 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅), 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝖨𝖠 𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗅𝖾́𝖼𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺 𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖳𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆 𝖾́, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖳𝖤𝖢𝖲 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖺 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈, 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗉𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 (𝖲𝖬𝖱𝗌) 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 (𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗉𝗌), 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝖠.

𝖤𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖨𝖠 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗂𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖲𝗎𝗅, 𝖩𝖺𝗉𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖲𝗂𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗉𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝖽𝗈 𝖵𝗂𝖾𝗍𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗎 𝗈𝗌 𝟣𝟢𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈.

𝖠 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈, 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗂𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝗋𝖾𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠 𝖾𝗆 𝖺́𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌/𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗇𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗉𝗌 𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺.

𝖠 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖬𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠, 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗏𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺́𝗋𝖾𝖺, 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖳𝗋𝗎𝗆𝗉 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖾𝖼𝖾.

𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂 𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖺́𝗉𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗅ı́𝖽𝖾𝗋.

𝖳𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗆𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝖼𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖿𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈. 𝖤𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗈 𝖮𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾/𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾́𝖼𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝗋, 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝗋 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗎𝖼𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖾𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟥ª 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟦ª. 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺.

𝖭𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈, 𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗓𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖠𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠, 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗋, 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖨𝖠 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗓 𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝖨𝖠 – 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 – 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺.

𝖯𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺-𝗌𝖾, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾́𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗈 𝖮𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌 𝗅ı́𝖽𝖾𝗋 – 𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠.

𝖠𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖧𝖾𝗀𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖺 𝖺𝖿𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖮𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖺 ı́𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟥𝟧 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺. 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟦𝟫 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖺, 𝗈𝗌 𝟣𝟢𝟢 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖯𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺.

* Economista

IN "O JORNAL ECONÓMICO"- 15/07/26

NR: O Tuga básico pensa na China do mesmo modo que vira a tromba para a uma loja chinesa instalada em Portugal, um conjunto de bugigangas.

Em 2007 e em Pequim construia-se uma torre de trinta andares por dia, obra acabada, 12 novas linhas de metro, porque os jogos olímpicos aconteciam no ano seguinte. Já existiam avenidas com cinco faixas de trânsito para cada lado,ladeadas por jardins, trânsito ordenado com 5 milhões de motorizadas. Nas auto estradas a velocidade máxima era de 90km/hora e ai de quem prevaricasse. A visita à Cidade Proíbida demorava 4 horas a pé. 

 Xangai tinha 50 Universidades e viajámos num comboio a 432 km/h, monorail magnético sem maquinista. 

Em Xiam vimos mais de 10 mil estátuas de guerreiros de terra cota, todas com rostos diferentes que estiveram soterradas 2.200 anos e havia mais escavações a decorrer, imagine-se a qualidade de escavação arqueológica. Existem fábricas de mobiliário de terracota, decorado com madrepérola e outra pedras e toda a gente pensa que é madeira. Nesse mesmo ano o governo mantinha "exportados" 200 milhões de estudantes universitários para fazer pós graduações em universidades europeias, americanas e outras. 

Perceba-se porque JOÃO ABEL DE FREITAS escreve verdade..