JOÃO PAULO BATALHA

 .

O clique mágico

da opacidade

Com um toque de botão, Aguiar-Branco fez-se campeão da ocultação.

𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒, 𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜, 𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑜, 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜, 𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑡𝑎𝑥𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑥𝑎”, 𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝟸𝟻 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑙. “𝑇𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦-𝑠𝘩𝑜𝑤. 𝐸 𝑓𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎”.

𝑇𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐴𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎𝑟-𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎. 𝟹𝟷 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑠, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑜.

𝐴 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝘩𝑜𝑤, 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑒𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝟸𝟻 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑙 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑛𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎 𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑛𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑜, 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜. 𝑁𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑚𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎́𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜: 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑜̃𝑒-𝑠𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑢. 𝐴𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎𝑟-𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜, 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚.

𝑂 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑖𝑟𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜, 𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑏𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑎, 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐽𝑜𝑠𝑒́ 𝑃𝑒𝑑𝑟𝑜 𝐴𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎𝑟-𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜, 𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑙 𝑎𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑢́𝑑𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑖 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑎̃ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜, 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝟹𝟷 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝜄́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑎̀ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎. 𝑄𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝐴𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎𝑟-𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑒 “𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑎̂𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑠𝑢𝑗𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙”. 𝐸, 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜, 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒̂ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 “𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝜄́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑗𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙”.

𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒́ 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎.ᐣ 𝐸́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 “𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑜𝑠, 𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑒 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠”. 𝐹𝑎𝑧 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜. 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝘩𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑟𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜; 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝜄́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑜. 𝐷𝑎𝜄́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠.

𝐴𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎𝑟-𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑎𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑀𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑎̃ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑢 𝑎 𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎. 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎.ᐣ “𝑂 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑐𝘩𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑎̂𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑢𝑗𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙”. 𝑁𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑎𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑛𝑐𝘩𝑒𝑟 𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑎̃𝑜𝑧𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑚𝑎́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑠𝑢𝑗𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑙𝑜. 𝐶𝑎𝑏𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑎̀ 𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑇𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜. 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑢𝑛𝑓𝑎 𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒.

𝐿𝑢𝜄́𝑠 𝑀𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑓𝑎𝑐̧𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑧 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎𝑟-𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜. 𝑂 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜-𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑇𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑎𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑆𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑎, 𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑡𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑎̃𝑜. 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠.

𝐸́ 𝑜́𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑠𝜄́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠. 𝐸́ 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜́𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚 𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠. 𝐸́ 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑙. 𝐸𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠, 𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑒́ 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜, 𝑠𝑢𝑗𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖. 𝑄𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑐̧𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑢 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 – 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑙𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜. 𝑈𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜, 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑟, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑢 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑜 “𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙”. 𝐴𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑜́𝑟𝑔𝑎̃𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑠. 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎. 𝐴𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎𝑟-𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢.

𝑂 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 (𝑜𝑢 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜) 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑎𝑠-𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑚 “𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑎”. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑠𝑢𝑗𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑙𝑜, 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑜́𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠.ᐟ 𝑀𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑔𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑎-𝐺𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙, 𝑔𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑎-𝐺𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜́𝑠 𝑡𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑠, 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑜 𝐽𝑜𝑠𝑒́ 𝑃𝑒𝑑𝑟𝑜.

𝐸́ 𝑛𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝐴𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎𝑟-𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑐̧𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜. 𝐴𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜́𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑠, 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒́𝑐𝑖𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎-𝑑𝑒-𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝘩𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑟𝜄́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜. 𝑈𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑎-𝐺𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙, 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 “𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜” 𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 “𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑙𝘩𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜”, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑒́ 𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜́𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑠,

𝑒́ 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝜄́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑖, 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑢́𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎, 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎 – 𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑗𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑎. 𝑄𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑜𝑠, 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑢́𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑧𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑧 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎𝑟-𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜 – 𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 – 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑜́𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑠.

𝐴 𝐸𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑇𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑢 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜-𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑆𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑎, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑑𝑟𝑢́𝑥𝑢𝑙𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑙𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝜄́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠-𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠. 𝑆𝑒 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜 𝑓𝑒𝑧, 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑎𝑟-𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜 – 𝑒 𝑝𝑜̂𝑟 𝑛𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜.

* Consultor de políticas anti-corrupção.

IN "SÁBADO"-21/05/26.