MICAELA GOMES

 .

Clima e violência:

a convergência de

duas crises globais

As alterações climáticas não produzem, por si só, guerras ou genocídios, mas intensificam vulnerabilidades e podem acelerar crises em contextos já instáveis. Pensar clima e conflito em conjunto é essencial para prevenir futuras tragédias e para construir respostas políticas e humanitárias mais eficazes.

𝖠 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋, 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾. 𝖤𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗅𝗈, 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺. 𝖯𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌? 𝖮 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍ı́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗎ı́𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖺́𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗂 𝗌𝗈́, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌. 𝖠𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈, 𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺. 𝖭𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗎𝗓𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋, 𝗉𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖠𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗓𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖿𝖺𝗏𝗈𝗋𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈.

𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖺́𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗀𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌. 𝖠 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌, 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝖼𝗅𝗈𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺.

𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝖺̂𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝖺 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖯𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗈𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗌, 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝟣𝟩% 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗁ı́𝖽𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝟪𝟥%. 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖺́𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗀𝗋ı́𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗆ı́𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌. 𝖠𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎ı́𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗈𝖽𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗋ı́𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺. 𝖠 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖯𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋ı́𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝖺. 𝖮 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖵𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖩𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖦𝖺𝗓𝖺, 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗊𝗎ı́𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝖾𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖦𝖺𝗓𝖺. 𝖯𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝖿ı́𝖼𝗂𝗅 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗉𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺.

𝖭𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖨𝗋𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗈𝖻𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅. 𝖤𝗆 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌, 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗓𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝗈. 𝖠 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅ı́𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺, 𝖺𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗂 𝗈 𝖺𝗋. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖺 𝟧 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖢𝖮₂ (𝗈 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝗈). 𝖠̀ 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖯𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝗈 𝖨𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝟧 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝟧𝟢°𝖢. 𝖤𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺 𝖯𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗂𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗈 𝖨𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝗆𝗎𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾.

𝖭𝗈 𝖲𝗎𝖽𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗆ı́𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅. 𝖮𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋, 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖮 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝖾𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈-𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗏𝗎𝗅𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗒, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗉𝗂𝗌𝗈́𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟢, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗆𝖾́𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌. 𝖠𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗈𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌, 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈.

𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖾̂𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌; 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗎𝗅𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖯𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝗎𝗅𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌. 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾́ 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺. 𝖠𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖻𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗈 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗉𝗍𝖺𝗋.

𝖮𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖾̂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗆. 𝖤𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺, 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌. 𝖠 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝖺̀ 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗂 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖤𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝗆𝖺, 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗓𝖾𝗆, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗂 𝗌𝗈́, 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗈𝖼ı́𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝗏𝗎𝗅𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌. 𝖠 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾-𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗀𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗂𝗋 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗌.

* Investigadora. Mestre em Engenharia Têxtil e doutoranda na Universidade do Minho. Ativista interseccional

IN "ESQUERDA"-29/04/26

NR: Façamos uma pequena experiência. Todos nós conhecemos com maior ou menor dimensão, políticos e empresários, também sindicalistas e detentores de cargos públicos. Perguntem-lhes simplesmente o que têm feito para reduzir o efeito de estufa, a poluição urbana, perguntem por exemplo aos fumadores se na rua deitam as beatas para o chão. Terão respostas não surpreendentes. .