MARIA NATÁLIA GONÇALVES

 .

‘Se não estás a pagar pelo

produto, então o produto és tu’

Dados, poder e concorrência

no mundo digital

A moeda mudou. Dados, atenção e dependência passaram a ser elementos centrais da troca económica.

‘𝖲𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́𝗌 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗈, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗈 𝖾́𝗌 𝗍𝗎’. 𝖠 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗌𝖾, 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎ı́𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝖠𝗇𝖽𝗋𝖾𝗐 𝖫𝖾𝗐𝗂𝗌, 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗅𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗋-𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗆, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌.

𝖣𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾́𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌: 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗋? 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖬𝖾𝗍𝖺, 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖥𝖺𝖼𝖾𝖻𝗈𝗈𝗄 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖨𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗆, 𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺. 𝖤 𝗌𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗓𝖾𝗋𝗈?

𝖠̀ 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖬𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌. 𝖬𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗎́𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗈. 𝖭𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝖺́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝗈𝗎, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗋. 𝖭𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗑𝖺: 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾, 𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌; 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 (𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈).

𝖮 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖬𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖺. 𝖮 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖠𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂, 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋-𝗌𝖾-𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖠 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾́𝗋𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝖾 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈.

𝖣𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝖺 𝖬𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗈 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗋ı́𝗀𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈, 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 ‘𝗍𝖺𝗄𝖾 𝗂𝗍 𝗈𝗋 𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗂𝗍’, 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌: 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗋?

𝖠 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖮 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗅𝖺́ 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ (𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗎́𝖽𝗈𝗌). 𝖮𝗌 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾́𝖼𝗂𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖾́𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝗋 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈.

𝖤́ 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖼𝗋𝗎𝗓𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈-𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾́𝗋𝗌𝗂𝖺. 𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗋ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗆ı́𝗇𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌: 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖲𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗅𝖾𝗀ı́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈? 𝖮𝗎 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅? 𝖮𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗈. 𝖲𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗃𝗎ı́𝗓𝗈?

𝖭𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖬𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎. 𝖬𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝖼𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋, 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗆ı́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅. 𝖯𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖥𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖳𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝖻𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 (𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗈) 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗏𝗎𝗅𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌. 𝖭𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗆ı́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗑𝗂𝗆𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺; 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗈 𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗈 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺.

𝖭𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾-𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌. 𝖠 𝗆𝗈𝖾𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝗈𝗎. 𝖣𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺. 𝖮 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖬𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖺, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺. 𝖠 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗃𝗈𝗀𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗌ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅. 𝖩𝗈𝗀𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺.

𝖭𝗈 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 ‘𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈?’ 𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 ‘𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺́-𝗅𝗈?’. 𝖤 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺́-𝗅𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗏𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺.

𝖭𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗓𝖾𝗋𝗈, 𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋, 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋.

* Docente da Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia, Secção A. de Direito

IN "NASCER DO SOL"- 31/03/26 .