ÁLVARO ROCHA

 .

As nossas universidades

foram capturadas por

elites medíocres

Como podem as nossas universidades permitir que a avaliação do mérito seja conduzida por quem, objetivamente, apresenta níveis de desempenho muito inferiores aos avaliados?

𝓗𝓪́ 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓼 (𝓮, 𝓮𝓶 𝓰𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓵, 𝓫𝓸𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓪𝓭𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪) 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓬𝓪𝓹𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓼𝓪𝓵𝓿𝓸 𝓻𝓪𝓻𝜾́𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼, 𝓼𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓶𝓮𝓭𝜾́𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓮. 𝓔, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪, 𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓻-𝓼𝓮: 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓿𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪 𝓸 𝓶𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸.

𝓙𝓪́ 𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝓸𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓰𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼, 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓲 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓷𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓷𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓻. 𝓗𝓸𝓳𝓮, 𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓾𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝜾́𝓿𝓮𝓵, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓮: 𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 (𝓸𝓾 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓪) 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 “𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓮𝓼” 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼.

𝓞 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓷𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼, 𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓶𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸. 𝓝𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓯𝓪𝓼𝓮, 𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓸, 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝜾́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓰𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓮́𝓶𝓲𝓬𝓪. 𝓒𝓸𝓶 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓮 𝓷𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 (𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓸𝓻𝜾́𝓽𝓶𝓲𝓬𝓸) 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓸𝓫𝓳𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪.

𝓐𝓽𝓮́ 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲, 𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓫𝓮𝓶.

𝓞 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓬̧𝓪 𝓷𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓯𝓪𝓼𝓮, 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓪 𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓾 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓤𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝜾́𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪̀𝓼 𝓿𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼, 𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶 𝓪 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵. 𝓔 𝓯𝓪́-𝓵𝓸, 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓮 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓹𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓼, 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓳𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼.

𝓔́ 𝓷𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓶𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓿𝓾𝓵𝓷𝓮𝓻𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓪̀ 𝓪𝓻𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓮𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮.

𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬̧𝓸 𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝜾́𝓼, 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸𝓫𝓽𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 “𝓔𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮” 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓸𝓫𝓳𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼. 𝓝𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸, 𝓪𝓹𝓸́𝓼 𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻 (𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓮́𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓲𝓹𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓸𝓼) 𝓪 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 “𝓜𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓑𝓸𝓶”.

𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓾 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓷𝓾́𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓸𝓾 𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓻𝜾́𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓐 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓵𝓾𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́, 𝓷𝓸 𝓶𝜾́𝓷𝓲𝓶𝓸, 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓫𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓪: 𝓸𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝜾́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓶𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓫𝓪𝓼𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓢𝓬𝓸𝓹𝓾𝓼, 𝓦𝓮𝓫 𝓸𝓯 𝓢𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓮 𝓸𝓾 𝓖𝓸𝓸𝓰𝓵𝓮 𝓢𝓬𝓱𝓸𝓵𝓪𝓻, 𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓼𝓾𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓪̀ 𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓽𝓮 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻.

𝓞𝓾 𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪, 𝓾𝓶 𝓾́𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓰𝓻𝓾𝓹𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓿𝓪.

𝓘𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓽𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵: 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶, 𝓸𝓫𝓳𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪 𝓷𝜾́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼.ᐣ

𝓐 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓼𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓮𝓼, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓮́ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪. 𝓡𝓮𝓼𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓸, 𝓭𝓮 𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓾𝓬𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓻𝓾𝓽𝜾́𝓷𝓲𝓸 𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸 𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓮𝓶 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓽𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓻𝓪 (𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪) 𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮.

𝓐 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓮 𝓾́𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓪 𝓯𝓪𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 (𝓪 𝓱𝓸𝓶𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓟𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸𝓾 𝓓𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓪 𝓔𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓪/𝓕𝓪𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮) 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓻𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼. 𝓟𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸, 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓪 𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓪́-𝓵𝓪𝓼.

𝓔 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓻𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼, 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝜾́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓸 𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝜾́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓷𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓶𝓪́𝔁𝓲𝓶𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓭𝓻𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼. 𝓝𝓸 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓸, 𝓸 𝓓𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓪 𝓕𝓪𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓿𝓪 𝓾𝓶 𝜾́𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓮 𝓗 𝓷𝓪 𝓢𝓬𝓸𝓹𝓾𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝟒, 𝓮𝓷𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓾𝓶 𝜾́𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝟑𝟏.

𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓽𝜾́𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼. 𝓢𝓪̃𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓭𝜾́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓮 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵.

𝓢𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓻 𝓯𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸, 𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓸-𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓸 𝓶𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓮́ 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓮 𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓷𝓸 𝓽𝓸𝓹𝓸 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼. 𝓔 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪́ 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪𝓼, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓼 𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝜾́𝓼.

𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓵 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓻-𝓼𝓮 𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓵𝓾𝔁𝓸.ᐟ

* Professor universitário

IN "SÁBADO"-19/03/26 .