ANA INÊS PATRÍCIO

 .

TEXTO INADEQUADO PARA MEMBROS

DO GOVERNO, DEPUTADOS, AUTORIDADES DA TUTELA,

POR DEMONSTRAREM FALHA GRAVE DE COMPREENSÃO

.

A solidão

como falha estrutural

Quando é preciso uma médica de família, dois anos depois, para detetar uma ausência, não estamos perante uma falha clínica. Estamos perante uma falha social profunda

𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪.

𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓬̧𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵.

𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓭𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪.

𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝔁𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪.

𝓕𝓸𝓲 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓮́𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝜾́𝓵𝓲𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓭𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓼, 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓸𝓾 𝓪 𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓬𝓻𝓸́𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓫𝓮́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓸𝓾 𝓸 𝓼𝓲𝓵𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓷𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝔃 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮 𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓸𝓻𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓽𝜾́𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪.

𝓤𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓪 𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓵𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓪 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵. 𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓮𝓹𝓲𝓼𝓸́𝓭𝓲𝓸 𝓲𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓶𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓯𝓻𝓪𝓰𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮.

𝓐 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓸𝓾 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓯𝓮𝓷𝓸́𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓾 𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓽𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵. 𝓡𝓮𝓼𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓰𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓻, 𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓸𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓰𝓮𝓸𝓰𝓻𝓪́𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓭𝓪 𝓾𝓻𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓭𝓪, 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓲𝓪 𝓲𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓷𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓽𝓸. 𝓥𝓲𝓿𝓮-𝓼𝓮 𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓮́𝓭𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼, 𝓻𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓫𝓪𝓲𝓻𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪. 𝓙𝓪́ 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓪𝓵 𝓪𝓸 𝓿𝓲𝔃𝓲𝓷𝓱𝓸, 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓶 𝓶𝓸𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓸 𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝜾́𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓸, 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓯𝜾́𝓼𝓲𝓬𝓪.

𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵, 𝓮́ 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓬𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵.

𝓐 𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓰𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪 𝓱𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓪 𝓮 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸̃𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓮𝓼𝓪̃𝓸. 𝓞 𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓷𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝜾́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓿𝓪𝓰𝓸, 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓸 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵. 𝓜𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓳𝓾𝓻𝜾́𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓸 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲 𝓪 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝜾́𝓿𝓲𝓬𝓪.

𝓐 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝜾́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼, 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓷𝓪 𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪. 𝓐 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓮𝓻𝓿𝓲𝓬̧𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓾 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓲𝓵𝓾𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵: 𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮́ 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 “𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓮́𝓶” 𝓮 𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 “𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼”. 𝓐 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓬𝓾𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓷𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵.

𝓐 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓾 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼. 𝓒𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓮 𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓬̧𝓸 𝓯𝓮𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓬𝓲𝓻𝓬𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸, 𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓪̃, 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓵𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓱𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓸. 𝓞 𝓲𝓭𝓸𝓼𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓲𝔁𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓼𝜾́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓪́𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪.

𝓐 𝓮𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓻 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝜾́𝓿𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵.

𝓐 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓲𝓬𝓮 𝓮𝓶 𝓲𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵.

𝓞 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓪𝓬̧𝓸 𝓾𝓻𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓾 𝓪𝓸 𝓮𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓻 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝔁𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮.

𝓐𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝜾́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓸 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓱𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼.

𝓔𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓾𝓼𝓪, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵: 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝜾́𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓶, 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓵𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓶, 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓮𝓶 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝔁𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓼, 𝓭𝓸 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓸𝓻𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪, 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪 𝓸 𝓲𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸.

𝓝𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓵 𝓷𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓹𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓭𝓪. 𝓣𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓪-𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓵.

𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓲 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓫𝓪𝓽𝓮, 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓽𝓪, 𝓾𝓶 𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓪 𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪.

𝓠𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓮́𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝜾́𝓵𝓲𝓪, 𝓭𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓼, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪 𝓬𝓵𝜾́𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓪. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓪.

𝓔 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼, 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓸𝓾 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓼. 𝓡𝓮𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓮-𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝜾́𝓿𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓮𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵, 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓲𝔃𝓲𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓬̧𝓪.

𝓢𝓮𝓶 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓿𝓪𝔃𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮.

𝓔 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓾𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓪 𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓶𝓪𝓻 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓰𝓮́𝓭𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓷𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓮́ 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮.

* Advogada

IN "VISÃO" -28/01/26 .