.
a peida é um regalo ... do nariz a gente trata
Cansados de blogs bem comportados feitos por gente simples, amante da natureza e blá,blá,blá, decidimos parir este blog do non sense.Excluíremos sempre a grosseria e a calúnia, o calão a preceito, o picante serão ingredientes da criatividade. O resto... é um regalo
20/11/2024
MARIA J. PAIXÃO
.
Democracia em vertigem
Estamos a assistir, em tempo real, à erosão acelerada da democracia e do
Estado de Direito edificados no Ocidente do pós-Segunda Guerra Mundial.
Mais do que os abomináveis eventos a que assistimos, é a reação das
elites e o discurso público dominante que dão provas disso.
𝖠𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖼𝗈𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖮𝖽𝖺𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗂́𝖽𝗂𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖯𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝖺̀ 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝖾́𝗅𝖾𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝗅𝗎𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗇 𝖭𝗂𝖾𝗆𝗈̈𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗓𝗂-𝖿𝖺𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈: «𝖯𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 / 𝖤 𝖾𝗎 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗂 /𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 / 𝖣𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 / 𝖤 𝖾𝗎 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗂 / 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 / 𝖣𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 / 𝖤 𝖾𝗎 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗂 / 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 / 𝖣𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗎𝗌 / 𝖤 𝖾𝗎 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗂 / 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗎 / 𝖣𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗆 / 𝖤 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 / 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗂𝗆.».
𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗋, 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅, 𝖺̀ 𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖮𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈́𝗌-𝖲𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖦𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖬𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗅. 𝖬𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈.
𝖨𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌, 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝗆 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈. 𝖠 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗀𝖺𝗆 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌. 𝖠𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅. 𝖤, 𝗇𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝖼𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈.
𝖮𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 (𝗈 𝖳𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖯𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗈 𝖳𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖩𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺) 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖮 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖭𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖿𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗋𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝖽𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖺 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗈𝖼𝗂́𝖽𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́-𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗌. 𝖮 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝖾𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗎́𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈. 𝖳𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝟪𝟢 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝖺 𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖮𝖭𝖴, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗋, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗍𝗈, 𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖳𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈, 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂́𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈́𝗌-𝟣𝟫𝟦𝟧 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾.
𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝖺́, 𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖮𝖽𝖺𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗎 𝗅𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗅 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅: 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆, 𝖺𝗋𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗎𝗆 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆. 𝖠̀ 𝖻𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖻𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖿𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗓, 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅. 𝖠𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖺𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂́𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈-𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌.
𝖠𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺-𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝖼𝗁𝖺𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺 𝗂𝗅𝗎𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈. 𝖠𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌.
𝖳𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺-𝗌𝖾, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖾, 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖡𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗃𝗎𝗅𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖢𝗅𝖺́𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝖲𝗂𝗆𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗎. 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺𝗌 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗌𝗎𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 – 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅, 𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗎𝗉𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗇𝗎́𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖮 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 ‘𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾’ 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺 𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗓𝗂𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂́𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗈-𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌. 𝖮 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂́𝗉𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗈𝗇𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 "𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌" 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗅𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈.
𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋, 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅, 𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆. 𝖥𝗈𝗂 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖭𝗂𝖾𝗆𝗈̈𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗋. 𝖤 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖾𝗆𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗂𝗋𝗎𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌. 𝖠 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖮 𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖺 𝖻𝗋𝗎𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗎𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈. 𝖮 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗎𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝗂́𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗅𝗈.𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌; 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗆𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺́ 𝗅𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅; 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 "𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺" 𝖾́ 𝗆𝗈𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈; 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗈… 𝖾́ 𝗆𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋. 𝖢𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾̂𝗆 𝖻𝗎𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝗈́𝗌.
* Assistente Convidada na Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra e Investigadora na área do Direito do Clima. Ativista pela Justiça Climática junto de vários movimentos sociais
IN "SÁBADO" - 03/11/24 .
Subscrever:
Mensagens (Atom)