A reação de Manuel Clemente e José Ornelas ao relatório da comissão
independente é, para além de um desalmado insulto às vítimas e à
comissão, um compêndio de pecados capitais. Mentira na afirmação de que
não se podem suspender clérigos face a alegações de abuso, avareza na
recusa de sequer admitir indemnizações, soberba na presunção de que,
como sempre, se safarão desta.
"𝖤𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺, 𝗈 𝖻𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺̂𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗂 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗃𝖺, 𝖽𝖾, 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈 (...), 𝗈𝗎 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈."
𝖠 𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟪 "𝖭𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗌", 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖤𝗉𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗉𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖡𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝖢𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠, 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖼𝖺̂𝗇𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝟣𝟩𝟤𝟤 (𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗂 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺), 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗌 "𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈" 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌.
𝖭𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖾, 𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖤𝗉𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗉𝖺𝗅 𝖠𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺, 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗎𝗆 "𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌" 𝗇𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗈̂𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗈𝖼𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌: "𝖴𝗆 𝖻𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗅𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖨𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺, 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗅𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗋, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈, 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗎 𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈. 𝖠𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝗀𝗈𝗓𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗈𝖼𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖨𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈. 𝖲𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗈 𝖻𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖻𝗈𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗎𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈".
𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝖺̂𝗇𝗈𝗇𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝖻𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗍𝗈 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖨𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 (𝖢𝖨) 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖤𝗉𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗉𝖺𝗅 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖺 (𝖢𝖤𝖯) 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝖨𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖢𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗎 𝖺̀ 𝖢𝖤𝖯, 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝖩𝗈𝗌𝖾́ 𝖮𝗋𝗇𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖾𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖫𝗂𝗌𝖻𝗈𝖺, 𝖬𝖺𝗇𝗎𝖾𝗅 𝖢𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾.
𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗈, 𝖢𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖾𝗌 "𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗃𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗌𝗎𝗃𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈" 𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂́𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖲𝖾́, 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ "𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖻𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗂". 𝖳𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖮𝗋𝗇𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 "𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗃𝖺́" 𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗎: "𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾 "𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆". 𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾? 𝖤𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗋? 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈? 𝖳𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾, 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾́𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾."
𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗎𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺.
"𝖠 𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗎 𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖦𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖧𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈 𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋/𝖺 [𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗈𝗌𝖺𝗌]", 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝗈́𝗅𝗈𝗀𝖺 𝖠𝗇𝖺 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖠𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗓 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝖨, 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖳𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗂𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝖤𝖯. "𝖭𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖺. 𝖮𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗁𝗂𝖾𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈, 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈, 𝖾𝗍𝖼. 𝖠 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 (𝖻𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗋)."
𝖮𝗌 𝖻𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖠𝗇𝖺 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖠𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗂𝖽𝖺, "𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾́𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗌. 𝖠𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾̂-𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖦𝖨𝖧. 𝖮𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈".
𝖠𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖢𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝖮𝗋𝗇𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖻𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗑𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖡𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖺, 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖠𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗈 𝖯𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈: "𝖮 𝖻𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋, 𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗋, 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗋, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖣𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 (...) 𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈."
𝖠 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗈́𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝖺́𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖡𝗋𝗈𝗈𝗄𝗅𝗒𝗇 (𝖭𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖨𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖤𝖴𝖠) 𝗇𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌: "𝖮 𝖻𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈, 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗍𝖺, 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈, 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗀𝖾𝗋 𝖿𝗂𝖾́𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈."
𝖠𝗅𝗂𝖺́𝗌 𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝖺́𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖻𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖺𝗓𝗎𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟢𝟥 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈. 𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺-𝗌𝖾, 𝗃𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖾 - 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 - 𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖾. 𝖭𝖺 𝗉𝖺́𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗁𝗂𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾: 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗅𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗇𝗎́𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 (𝟫𝟣𝟣, 𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝟣𝟣𝟤), 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖭𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖨𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖾 𝗌𝗈́ 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗈 𝗇𝗎́𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖺𝗓𝗎𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, "𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾".
𝖠𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺, 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖡𝗋𝗈𝗈𝗄𝗅𝗒𝗇, 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋, 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆 "𝖼𝗈𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌", 𝖺𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝖺𝖻𝖾 𝗈 "𝖼𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗍𝗈" 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌, 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗌; 𝖼𝗈𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗈 𝖻𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖺́ 𝗋𝖾𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌. 𝖬𝖺𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈, 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖺́ (𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝖺𝗋𝖺́) 𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗓 𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖤 𝖽𝗂𝗓 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾̂: "𝖬𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗈 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈."
𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖺𝗓𝗎𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾́𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺: 𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝗌𝗎𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 - 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 "𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈", "𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗈𝖼𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺" 𝖾 "𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌" 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌.
𝖰𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾, 𝗇𝖺 𝖨𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖭𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾? 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟣 𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝖺́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟪𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗌 (𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟢𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌), 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗃𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗈𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 "𝖾𝗑𝖺𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌". 𝖤𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖽𝗈𝗍𝖾, 𝖬𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖼𝗁𝗒 𝖥𝗂𝗇𝗇𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗇, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗎 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟢𝟤 𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖺𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗈 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾́𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌. 𝖭𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟣 𝗇𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌, 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗋 "𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺."
𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖺 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝖼𝗎𝗃𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗋 𝖺̀ 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗃𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌? 𝖢𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 - 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗇𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗎́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖢𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖾 𝖣𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈.
𝖨𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖾́𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾-𝗂𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖮𝗋𝗇𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖢𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖮 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖿𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 (𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖵𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖺𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖢𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺́-𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌) 𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌 - 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 - 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗍𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 "𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗈𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌" 𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌.
"𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈", 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾-𝖺́. 𝖠 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌: 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆. 𝖤𝗋𝖺 - 𝖾́ - 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗌.
.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário