SANDRA CLEMENTE

 .

A mesmice em três takes

As mesmas críticas ao SNS de parte de quem nada fez; o mesmo fardo fiscal para os maiores de 35 anos; os mesmos beneficiários dos fundos europeus.

1-𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝗈́𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗂́𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗎 𝗈𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝖯𝖾𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗐𝖾𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗅𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 “𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝗎 𝗇𝖺 𝖺́𝗋𝖾𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾”. 𝖥𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗎 𝖺 𝖱𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗇𝗀𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝗂𝖺 “𝖮𝗇𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗌𝗍 𝖺𝗌𝗄” 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗎. 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖦𝗈𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗅. 𝖤𝗎 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗂 𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗇𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗍𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝗂𝖽𝗂́𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈 𝖾́. 𝖤 𝖿𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖼𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌. 𝖮𝖼𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗁𝖺𝗓𝖺𝗋𝖽.

𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖯𝖾𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗂𝗎 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗈́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗀𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗈𝖻𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗍𝗋𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼 𝗀𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗌𝖿𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌. 𝖲𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖻𝗈𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖾? 𝖢𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖾́𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺̀ 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖺 𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝖾 𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗈 𝖯𝖲 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋, 𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗃𝖾𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗂𝗄𝖺, 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖥𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗉𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗅𝖺́ 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́.

𝖵𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗈́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺, 𝖺 𝖺́𝗋𝖾𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖽𝗋𝗎́𝗑𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌:

1-𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝖲𝖭𝖲, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝗈, 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗇𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗈 𝖲𝖭𝖲; 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗓 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖲𝖭𝖲. 𝖧𝖺́ 𝟥.𝟨 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾. 𝖮𝗋𝖺, 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖲𝖭𝖲 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝟥.𝟨 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝗈. 𝖣𝗈𝗀𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾, 𝖾́ 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗓 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋, 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗈𝗌. 𝖠 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗋 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖺𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗓𝖺, 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖣𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗎𝗆𝖺, 𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾̂ 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺𝗅 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋, 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗀𝖾𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾; 𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 , 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝖺 𝖠𝖣𝖲𝖤 𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾́𝗆𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗍𝖺𝗑𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖾 𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾́𝗆𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋? 𝖮𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝖼𝗅𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌. 𝖢𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝗈𝖽𝖾𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗓𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗑𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗈𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖲𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖻𝗈𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈𝗌. 𝖳𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖯𝖺𝗂́𝗌, 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾.

2-𝖮 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖠𝖣𝖬 – 𝖠𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖬𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖬𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌. 𝖳𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝖾? 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌? 𝖮 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋? 𝖣𝗂𝗋-𝗌𝖾-𝖺́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗆. 𝖢𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈, 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝗂𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺. 𝖧𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾̂𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝖠𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́. 𝖲𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗋 𝗅𝖺́ 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂́𝗅𝗂𝖺. 𝖱𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅. 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂́𝗅𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖮𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝖺́𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅? 𝖲𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝗈́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈, 𝖾, 𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖮𝗎 𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌? 𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖴𝗋𝗌𝗎𝗅𝖺 𝗏𝗈𝗇 𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖫𝖾𝗒𝖾𝗇 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺, 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗎́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗈𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖺. 𝖤́ 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈. 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌;

3-𝖠 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗌: 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌. 𝖧𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖠𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗉𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅?;

4-𝖤 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅? 𝖠 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺, 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗉𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌? 𝖥𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗂́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾.

5-𝖣𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖮𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖬𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗓 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅, 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 “𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗈”. 𝖥𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗓𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖤𝗎 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗎 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈.

𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖯𝖾𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖱𝗎𝗂 𝖱𝗈𝖼𝗁𝖺, 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗈. 𝖮𝗎 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝖢𝖺𝗌𝖺 𝖡𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈 𝖿𝖺́𝖼𝗂𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋, 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖲𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝖺́𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺, 𝖽𝗈𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝖢𝖭𝖭 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝖻𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗍𝗋𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈𝗌; 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗂́𝗅𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗃𝖺𝗋.

𝖯𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾.

𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾, 𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗂𝗌: 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗂𝖻𝖺 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂́𝗋𝖾𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌; 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗂́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖲𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖻𝗈𝗆 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺́𝗋𝖾𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗎𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈 𝗃𝗈𝗀𝗈 (𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗋𝖺̃𝗈). 𝖤𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗅𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖥𝖾𝗅𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝗍𝖾̂𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖵𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖠𝗏𝖾, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗌, 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗁𝗌, 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗆𝗈́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌, 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌, 𝖯𝖺𝗎𝗅𝖺 𝖠𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗆𝗈́𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖿𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗂 𝗅𝖺́, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺.

𝟤.𝖧𝖺́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝗈𝖻𝗌𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗇 𝖵𝖺𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗒. 𝖯𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝟧𝟢, 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝟥𝟧 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌: 𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝖬𝖳 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝖾𝗅𝗈, 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖺, 𝖨𝖱𝖲 𝗃𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗆, 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗈́𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗈 𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝗂𝗀𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗌… 𝖠𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺 𝖨𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈́ 𝖺𝗌/𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖣𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺, 𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗏𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖡𝖺𝗅𝗌𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖫𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗌, 𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺. 𝖮 𝖣𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗂𝗍𝗍𝖾 𝖦𝖾𝗇 𝖹 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖬𝗂𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖲𝗎𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗒 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟦 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈, 𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾́𝗆-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗅 𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖦𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖹 𝖾 𝖬𝗂𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅. 𝖭𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝟦𝟩% 𝖽𝖺 𝖦𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖹 𝖾 𝟧𝟢% 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖬𝗂𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗌 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌.

𝖭𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅, 𝗌𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝟣𝟢 𝗃𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗌 (𝟧𝟨% 𝗇𝖺 𝖦𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖹 𝖾 𝟧𝟧% 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖬𝗂𝗅𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗌) 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 – 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖾̂𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖤 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖾̂𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌.

𝖲𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝟥𝟧 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆.

𝖤𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗆-𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖺 𝖻𝖾𝗆-𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝖺𝗑𝖺 𝗎́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝖱𝖲 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢%, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝖺́ 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈́𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝟥𝟧 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗈𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖮𝖢𝖣𝖤 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟥,

𝖠 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗆𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝗈 (𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗌) 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖽𝖾 𝟦𝟤,𝟥%, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟢,𝟣𝟦 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖲𝖾 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈…

𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗂𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗈 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈, 𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾̂𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺. 𝖲𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖦𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖬𝖺́𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗓 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗎𝗓𝖺𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗓𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖾 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗂.

𝖨𝗍𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗑𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟢𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝖬𝗂𝗅𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗎𝗑𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋-𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗈𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺. 𝖤́ 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌. 𝖣𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗂𝖾𝗏𝗌𝗄𝗂 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌𝗂𝖺, 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆.

𝟥.𝖢𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂 𝗈 𝖬𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖤𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌. 𝖮 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺̂𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗅𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟦𝟪 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖱𝖱 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗈-𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟣 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗂 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺: 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝟤𝟧 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌. 𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺, 𝗈𝗎 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗏𝗂𝗎, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗈́𝗋𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖱𝖱, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖺́𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌, 𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈, 𝖼𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌. 𝖭𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌, 𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗏𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖯𝖬𝖤 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈. 𝖮 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝟪𝟢% 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝟣𝟢𝟢% 𝖽𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺. 𝖮𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗌𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖤́ 𝗈́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗌, 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝗂?

𝖧𝖺́ 𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋, 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾!, 𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌. 𝖫𝗎𝗂́𝗌 𝖬𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾-𝗆𝖾 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌. 𝖳𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖺𝗂́𝖽𝗈 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖱𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖲𝗈𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗂́𝖽𝖺 – 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝗃𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝗀𝖾́𝗆𝖾𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝖼 𝗉𝗅𝗎𝗌 𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 – 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗆. 𝖮 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝗓 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖻𝗈𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗂𝗋 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌. 𝖲𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗏𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈.

* Advogada, militante do PSD

IN "OBSERVADOR" - 10/09/24.