e uma emissora pública
que escolhe o lado errado
A decisão da RTP de participar na Eurovisão 2026, mesmo com o boicote de
emissoras que tomaram a única posição coerente de recusar a
normalização da crueldade, não é neutra. O que se exigia era coerência
com os valores de justiça, solidariedade e dignidade humana.
𝖠 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖳𝖯 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝗈 𝖥𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟨, 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝖻𝗈𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈: 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖤𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺, 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖯𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖡𝖺𝗂𝗑𝗈𝗌, 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝗌𝗅𝖺̂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖤𝗌𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾́𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝖻𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗆 "𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾", 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗂𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈.
𝖮𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗈 "𝗍𝖾𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾" 𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝖻𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾: 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗁𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌. 𝖮 𝖻𝗈𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗍𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼ı́𝗉𝗂𝗈𝗌, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺́𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅, 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝟤.ª 𝖦𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖬𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺. 𝖮 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺.
𝖤́ 𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺. 𝖮𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖡𝗂𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗎́𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆.
𝖮 𝖻𝗈𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗍𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝗆ı́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅
𝖠 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖻𝗈𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺: 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝖾𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺, 𝖺 𝖠𝖵𝖱𝖮𝖳𝖱𝖮𝖲, 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖾 "𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗍ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗎𝗌𝖺̃𝗈".
𝖤 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝗈́ 𝖽𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗈𝖼ı́𝖽𝗂𝗈. 𝖳𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌. 𝖣𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗈𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅 𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝗅𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈.
𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺 𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺, 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗈𝖼ı́𝖽𝗂𝗈 𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗍ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼ı́𝗉𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝖺́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝗏ı́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺.
𝖠 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺: 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗓 𝖺̀ 𝖱𝗎́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅
𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖱𝗎́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗎 𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟤, 𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎 (𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖱𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗈𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗎𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖤𝖡𝖴 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗅𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗅𝖾̂𝗌) 𝗍𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺: 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗎 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗂𝖺 "𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗋𝗎𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈" 𝖾, 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗓 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌.
𝖤́ 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇𝗌ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗁𝗈𝗃𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖦𝖺𝗓𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌, 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖤𝖡𝖴 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗈𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗎́𝗋𝖻𝗂𝗈. 𝖤́ 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖤𝖡𝖴 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗓𝖺 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗎 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌.
𝖤𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝗎𝗉𝗅𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋: 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈, 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗓 𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗏𝗈𝗌. 𝖲𝖾 𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗎 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖱𝗎́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅? 𝖠 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺: 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝖽𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖾, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺̃𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺.
𝖠 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖳𝖯 𝖺𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈
𝖮 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖱𝖳𝖯 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖧𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆 "𝖻𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺" 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗁𝗂𝗉𝗈𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖤𝖡𝖴. 𝖯𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗓, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝗂𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝖱𝖳𝖯 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖠𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖥𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗃𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺̀ 𝖠́𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈, 𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖺 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺.
𝖠𝗉𝗈́𝗌 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝗌𝗅𝖺̂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝖤𝖡𝖴, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟫𝟩𝟢. 𝖨𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝟤𝟢 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖡𝗎𝗅𝗀𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝖬𝗈𝗅𝖽𝖺́𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖱𝗈𝗆𝖾́𝗇𝗂𝖺. 𝖭𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗎́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖥𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝖵𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺.
𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾, 𝖾́ 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗆𝗎́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾.
𝖤𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾̂? 𝖨𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺
𝖠 𝖤𝖡𝖴 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟦, 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺.
𝖠𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗈𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗈𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖲𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗆𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺. 𝖠 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺, 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗎𝗀𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖺 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗋𝖺, 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗆. 𝖠 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾́𝗆-𝗌𝖾.
𝖡𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝖤𝖡𝖴 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝗂𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖺́𝗋𝖾𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗌𝗆𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖬𝗈𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖼𝖺𝗇 𝖮𝗂𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖼𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟨. 𝖠 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖺ı́, 𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺̃𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝖿ı́𝖼𝗂𝗅 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗉𝖺ı́𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈.
𝖴𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗎𝗓 𝖺𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗎́𝗇𝖾𝗅, 𝗆𝖺𝗌…
𝖠 𝗎́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗅𝗎𝗓 𝖺𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗎́𝗇𝖾𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝖻𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗀𝗂𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗌. 𝖮 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖭𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗒𝖺𝗁𝗎 𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖪𝖠𝖭 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈. 𝖧𝖺́ 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝗈 𝖺̂𝗆𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗋𝖺́ 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖪𝖠𝖭 𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗀ı́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝗋𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖤𝖡𝖴 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌. 𝖭𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗎𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝖤𝖡𝖴 𝗌𝗈́ 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖿𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈.
𝖠 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖳𝖯 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟨, 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖻𝗈𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗎́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗇𝖾𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺. 𝖮 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺, 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺. 𝖮 𝖻𝗈𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺, 𝖯𝖺ı́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖡𝖺𝗂𝗑𝗈𝗌, 𝖨𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺, 𝖨𝗌𝗅𝖺̂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖾́𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈: 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗉𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌.
𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖺 𝖱𝖳𝖯 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖤 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖼̧𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗉ı́𝗍𝗎𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖥𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈.