MARCUS VINICIUS DE FREITAS

 .

UM TEXTO MUITO CLARO

O crepúsculo da Europa

Europa, outrora epicentro da modernidade e motor da prosperidade global, tornou-se prisioneira de suas próprias hesitações. Três causas explicam essa paralisia: a guerra na Ucrânia, a dependência face aos EUA e a rigidez institucional e produtiva.

𝖤𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟢𝟪, 𝗈 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅ı́𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖠 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝖯𝖨𝖡 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖺 (𝖯𝖯𝖢) 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟥,𝟥 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝟣𝟤,𝟪 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝟨,𝟦 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌 – 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎.

𝖣𝖾𝗓𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌, 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟦, 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖺 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗍𝗈. 𝖠 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝗈𝗎 𝟥𝟣,𝟫 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝖯𝖢. 𝖮𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝟤𝟧,𝟪 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝟤𝟦,𝟤 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗎 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈. 𝖴𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝖾́𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗓𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾, 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗁𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈.

𝖤𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈. 𝖠 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺, 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗉𝗂𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅, 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌. 𝖳𝗋𝖾̂𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗂𝖺. 𝖯𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗎 𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺, 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗈𝖾𝗎 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈. 𝖲𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝖶𝖺𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗍𝗈𝗇, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝗎 𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈̂𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖳𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝖺 𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾.

𝖨𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗀𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗌𝖺. 𝖮𝗌 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖯𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗆, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌. 𝖠 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓, 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺, 𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾́𝗋𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈. 𝖠 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈́𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖺: 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗎 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾.

𝖮 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋, 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗎𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖤𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋-𝗌𝖾-𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺̂𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖭𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗅𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗌. 𝖣𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋-𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 — 𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖾𝗆𝗈̂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺. 𝖣𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈, 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 — 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺-𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺. 𝖠 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺́, 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅.

𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗋? 𝖳𝗋𝖾̂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌. 𝖯𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗉𝖾̂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖶𝖺𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗍𝗈𝗇. 𝖲𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖳𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺, 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗏𝗂𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅. 𝖠 𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅ı́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾́ 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅

𝖢𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖺𝖽𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗎: “𝖮 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈 𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋.” 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎: 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖠 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗎 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆. 𝖠 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗌. 𝖮𝗎 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 — 𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺.

* Professor Visitante, China Foreign Affairs University e Senior Fellow, Policy Center for the New South

IN "O JORNAL ECONÓMICO" - 07/10/25 .