PATRÍCIA AKESTER

 .

O “paradoxo da bondade”

em tempos de guerra

“Mαıs do que em quαlquer

outrα épocα, α Humαnıdαde

estά numα encruzılhαdα.”

Woodч Allen

𝖠𝗉𝗈́𝗌 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖻𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖱𝗂𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖽 𝖶𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗎 𝖺̀ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝗎𝗉𝗅𝗈 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈: 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗎 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌; 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗎 𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 (𝖮 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗑𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖡𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾). 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖶𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗇𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌, 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗎 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖻𝖾́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺, 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖺́𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 - 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖻𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅.

𝖠𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾, 𝗇𝗈 𝖺̂𝗆𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 “𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗑𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖻𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾”, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖿𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺̃𝗈 (𝖡𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗄𝗂𝗇𝗀 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖲𝗂𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖼𝖾: 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝟣𝟢 𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗍 𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋-𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟥). 𝖠 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗌, 𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈, 𝖾𝗍𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝗂𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗅𝗂́𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 (𝖢. 𝖡𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗍𝗆𝖺𝗇, 𝖶𝗁𝗒 𝖶𝖾 𝖥𝗂𝗀𝗁𝗍: 𝖳𝗁𝖾 𝖱𝗈𝗈𝗍𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝖶𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖯𝖺𝗍𝗁𝗌 𝗍𝗈 𝖯𝖾𝖺𝖼𝖾). 𝖤𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝖾𝗏𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖠 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝖿𝗎𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗂𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗅 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾.

𝖨𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗍𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗇𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺 𝗆𝗈𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 (𝖬𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺, 𝖡𝗎𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗎𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗌, 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖥𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗀𝗇 𝖠𝗂𝖽 - 𝖠 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾 𝖠𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗒𝗌𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝖿 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝖲𝗍𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝗍𝗁𝖾 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖾𝖽 𝖪𝗂𝗇𝗀𝖽𝗈𝗆, 𝖢𝖺𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝖥𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖩𝖺𝗉𝖺𝗇 𝗈𝖿 𝖴𝖲 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗀𝗇 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾).

𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺, 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗈 𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 (𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺) 𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾. 𝖫𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅, 𝖾𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗉𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾́-𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖳𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝖼𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗀𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌.

𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝖻𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖧𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝟩 𝖽𝖾 𝖮𝗎𝗍𝗎𝖻𝗋𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗂𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗌𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺. 𝖵𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗂́𝗌𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺 𝗇𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝖬𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝗈 𝖮𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝖺́ 𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗂, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗈, 𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖻𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅.

𝖲𝗎𝖼𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆-𝗌𝖾, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌, 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝖡𝖾𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗇𝗈́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈.

𝖤́ 𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗀𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖺́𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗌, 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌; 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝖿𝖾́𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺; 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝖺̀ 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾, 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖺𝗎𝗑𝗂́𝗅𝗂𝗈 𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗂𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖵𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗅𝖺 𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗅𝖺, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗑𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗈.

𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗅𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖳𝗂𝗄𝖳𝗈𝗄, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗑𝗂𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝟣,𝟩 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 (𝗐𝗁𝖺𝗍𝗌𝗍𝗁𝖾𝖻𝗂𝗀𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖺.𝖼𝗈𝗆), 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂́𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗍𝗂́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝗃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂́𝗉𝗂𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗍𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝗈. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈; 𝖾́ 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝖻𝗈́𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗍𝖺́𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝖾𝖺. 𝖠 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖳𝗂𝗄𝖳𝗈𝗄 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗎́𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖺́𝗉𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌, 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗅𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗏𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗈.

𝖮 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈̃𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝖼𝗅𝗈, 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈, 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺?

𝖢𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖼𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈́𝗌 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 “𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾”.

𝖨𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂, 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 “𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾” 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗂𝖽𝗈 (𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂́𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈), 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 “𝗌𝖾𝗋” 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓, 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺 𝖺 𝗎𝗆 “𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋”. 𝖫𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖿𝗂𝗆, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 “𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋” 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂́𝗇𝗎𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 “𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾” 𝖾 “𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾” - 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖻𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗑𝗈 𝗈𝗎, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗈́𝗌𝗈𝖿𝗈 𝖦𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋𝖽 𝖫𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽, “𝖺𝗀𝗂𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾”.

* Fundadora do Gabinete de Propriedade Intelectual /Intellectual Property Office (GPI/IPO) e Associate do Centre for Intellectual Property and Information Law da University of Cambridge

IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" - 03/04/24 .