JOSÉ SOEIRO

 .

𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗩𝗘𝗭 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗥𝗘𝗜𝗘 𝗔𝗤𝗨𝗘𝗟𝗘𝗦 𝗤𝗨𝗘 𝗣𝗢𝗥 𝗠𝗔́ 𝗙𝗘́ 𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗨𝗡𝗜𝗔𝗠 𝗔 𝗜𝗠𝗜𝗚𝗥𝗔𝗖̧𝗔̃𝗢 𝗘 𝗘𝗟𝗢𝗚𝗜𝗔𝗠 𝗢𝗦 𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗔𝗦𝗜𝗧𝗔𝗦 𝗡𝗔𝗖𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗔𝗜𝗦

A direita quer “controlar a

imigração” ou apenas mantê-la

indefesa e sem direitos?

Os imigrantes pagam sete vezes mais ao sistema público do que recebem. São os portugueses quem beneficia de subsídios e pensões pagos pelos imigrantes. A economia portuguesa depende do trabalho migrante.

𝖣𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖮𝖻𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖺𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖬𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈: 𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟣,𝟨 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝖲𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖲𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅. 𝖤𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟤, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂́𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝟣.𝟪𝟨𝟣 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗌𝗈́ 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟧𝟩 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌. 𝖠𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆, 𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾. 𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗎𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌. 𝖮𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆, 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺́𝗌, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗍𝖺𝗑𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌: 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗃𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗌 𝖾 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌.

𝖠𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗈𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖺́-𝖿𝖾́, 𝗌𝗎𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈. 𝖮𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗂́𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈𝗌. 𝖲𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗂́𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌. 𝖣𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗂́𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺.

𝖮𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝟩,𝟧% 𝗇𝗈 𝗍𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖤𝗆 𝟣𝟢 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗈 𝗇𝗎́𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟩𝟢%. 𝖤́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖿𝗂𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌. 𝖠𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝖾 “𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗈”, 𝗇𝗈́𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗆𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌, 𝗌𝗈́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗋.

𝖲𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗉𝗌𝗈: 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈𝗌, 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖽𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝗂́𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺, 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖾́𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌. 𝖲𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗃𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗋𝗎́𝗉𝗎𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌, 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺, 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖲𝗈𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗈. 𝖭𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖾𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈-𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝖺𝖻𝗈-𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖼̧𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌.

𝖤́ 𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝖾𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈, 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗅𝗂́𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗈. 𝖱𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗋 𝖿𝗅𝗎𝗑𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗑𝖾𝗇𝗈́𝖿𝗈𝖻𝗈𝗌, 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖤́ 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖾́𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗅, 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗓 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗅 𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾́𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟫𝟫𝟢. 𝖤́ 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺. 𝖤́ 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗂𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗋. 𝖤́ 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗃𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈. 𝖤́ 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂́𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖺. 𝖤́ 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗅𝗂́𝗇𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌.

𝖤́ 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖾́𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗈 𝗈́𝖽𝗂𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗎, 𝖾𝗆 𝖲𝖾𝗍𝗎́𝖻𝖺𝗅, 𝖦𝗎𝗋𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗍 𝖲𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗁, 𝗃𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟧 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾́𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗃𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗅𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗈. 𝖠 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 “𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺” 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝖺. 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗂́𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈?

𝖤 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾, 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝗈 “𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈” 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺-𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗑𝖾𝗇𝗈́𝖿𝗈𝖻𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗈? 𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺́-𝗅𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈̃𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖰𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾̂-𝗅𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝗋, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗈 𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌.

* Dirigente do Bloco de Esquerda, sociólogo.

IN "EXPRESSO" - 20/12/23 .