RAFAEL PEREIRA

 .

Quando a polícia não

protege e o tribunal não

julga, o sistema falha

“Se eu não mordesse o braço dele, morria”. O argumento, dado por Cláudia Simões, ilustra bem o que tanto debatemos na academia e na política: a existência sufocante de racismo estrutural nas forças de segurança e nas instituições de justiça.

𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚐𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚞𝚖 𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚟𝚎𝚣𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕, 𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚊 𝚓𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝟸𝟶𝟸𝟶, 𝚖𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚎𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚒𝚍𝚎 𝚋𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚘-𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚘𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚗𝚊 𝙰𝚖𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚑𝚊, 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚝𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚜, 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚟𝚒𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚖 𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚒𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚐𝚘 𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎. 𝙲𝚕𝚊́𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚂𝚒𝚖𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚘𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚞 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊, 𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚊, 𝙲𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝙲𝚊𝚗𝚑𝚊, 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚊 𝚎𝚖 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚒𝚌̧𝚘 𝚗𝚘 𝚖𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘.

𝚃𝚘𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘, 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚎𝚖 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚘 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝙲𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝙲𝚊𝚗𝚑𝚊, 𝚊𝚌𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚒𝚛 𝙲𝚕𝚊́𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚂𝚒𝚖𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚊𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚘𝚏𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊 𝚊̀ 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚐𝚛𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚏𝚒́𝚜𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚊. 𝙾 𝚃𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚊 𝚁𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝙻𝚒𝚜𝚋𝚘𝚊 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚞 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚕𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚏𝚘𝚒 𝚍𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚊, 𝚗𝚞𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚑𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚕 𝚊̀ 𝚊𝚐𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚊, 𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚊𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜.

𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚊 𝚞𝚖 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚋𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚖 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚘, 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚘 𝚓𝚞𝚕𝚐𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚞 𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝟾 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚖𝚎̂𝚜 𝚎𝚖 𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚘 𝚃𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚎 𝚂𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊: “𝚂𝚎 𝚎𝚞 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎 𝚘 𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚕𝚎, 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚒𝚊”.

𝙾 𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚞𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘, 𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝙲𝚕𝚊́𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚂𝚒𝚖𝚘̃𝚎𝚜, 𝚒𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚋𝚎𝚖 𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚊 𝚊𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚊 𝚎 𝚗𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊: 𝚊 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚏𝚘𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚌̧𝚊 𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚒𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌̧𝚊. 𝙽𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚘 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚘 𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚊, 𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚒𝚜𝚊 𝚎́ 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊: 𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚗𝚘𝚞-𝚜𝚎 𝚕𝚎𝚐𝚒́𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚊, 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝚖𝚊̃𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚓𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕, 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚖𝚊̃𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚕𝚑𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝟽 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚞 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚘, 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚘 𝚊 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚊𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕, 𝚊 𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚝𝚛𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚘, 𝚊𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚎 𝚎𝚖 𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚟𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚖 𝚎𝚖 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚊 𝚊 𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 - 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚗𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚘𝚒𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚜, 𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚊𝚋𝚞𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚗𝚊 𝚊𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝙼𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎́𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝙿𝚞́𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚘, 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚖 𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚞́𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚊 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊̃𝚘.

𝙴́ 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚘 𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚎𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚒𝚊 𝙲𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝙲𝚊𝚗𝚑𝚊 𝚗𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚊 𝚓𝚞𝚕𝚐𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘. 𝙰 𝚏𝚊𝚟𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚞𝚜 𝚊𝚝𝚘𝚜, 𝚝𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚑𝚊 𝚘 𝚓𝚞𝚒𝚣 𝙲𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝙰𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚛𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚋𝚘𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊 𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚡𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚒𝚌̧𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚞, 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚙𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚌̧𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚘 𝚓𝚞𝚒𝚣 𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚒𝚛 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚍𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝙲𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚎 𝚂𝚊̃𝚘 𝙱𝚛𝚊́𝚜, 𝚗𝚊 𝙰𝚖𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚊.

𝙼𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚟𝚎𝚣, 𝚘𝚋𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚖 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚘 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚖 𝚋𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚌̧𝚊 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚞𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚐𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚜, 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊 𝚎 𝚗𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚘 𝚓𝚞𝚒𝚣 𝙲𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝙰𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚛𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚗𝚘 𝚖𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚜, 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚎𝚖 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚜𝚊.

𝙴𝚜𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚌𝚎-𝚜𝚎 𝙲𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝙰𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚛𝚎, 𝚎 𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚌𝚎𝚙𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚞́𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊, 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝙲𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝙲𝚊𝚗𝚑𝚊 𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝟻𝟿𝟷 𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚊𝚕𝚟𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚐𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎𝚖 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚜 𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚜 (𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚖 “𝚀𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚘 𝙾́𝚍𝚒𝚘 𝚅𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝙵𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚊”), 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚘́𝚍𝚒𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚙𝚊𝚐𝚊 𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚌̧𝚊 𝚊 𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚊 𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚖 𝚐𝚛𝚞𝚙𝚘𝚜 𝚏𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜.

𝙲𝚘𝚖 𝚙𝚘𝚞𝚌𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘, 𝚍𝚎𝚞-𝚜𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚟𝚞𝚕𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚗𝚊 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚟𝚊́𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒-𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜 - 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚘 𝚂𝙾𝚂 𝚁𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚘 𝚏𝚊𝚣 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎 - 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚟𝚘𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚏𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚎 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚊 𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚟𝚒𝚘𝚕𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚊𝚛𝚋𝚒𝚝𝚛𝚊́𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊𝚜 𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚜. 𝙰𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚊, 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚑𝚘𝚓𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚋𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜, 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚕𝚎𝚐𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚊 “𝚊 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚟𝚒𝚘𝚕𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚒, 𝚊𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚕, 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚚𝚞𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚞𝚜 𝚊𝚝𝚘𝚜 [𝚍𝚎 𝙲𝚕𝚊́𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚂𝚒𝚖𝚘̃𝚎𝚜].”

𝙾 𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘, 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚎̂𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚞𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚖 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚏𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚘, 𝚍𝚊́ 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚜, 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚞 𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝟷𝟻 𝚊̀ 𝚏𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝚃𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚎 𝚂𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎. 𝙴 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚖 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊 𝚘𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚊, 𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊, 𝚡𝚎𝚗𝚘́𝚏𝚘𝚋𝚊 𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚞𝚌𝚘 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚒𝚜 - 𝚎 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚘 𝚎𝚗𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚞 𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚙𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚎𝚖 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚘́𝚍𝚒𝚘 𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 - 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚞𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚖 𝚏𝚊𝚣𝚎𝚛 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚕𝚎𝚡𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚞𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚍𝚘𝚜. 𝙲𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚞𝚊 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚜𝚎𝚖 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚐𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚝𝚘𝚜, 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚘́ 𝚒𝚕𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚘, 𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚖 𝚍𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚊, 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚗𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚎 𝚍𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚌𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚊.

𝙽𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚏𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚘 𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚖 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚊̃𝚘 𝚊𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚚𝚞𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚜, 𝚗𝚎𝚖 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚞𝚌𝚘 𝚜𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚍𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚗𝚘 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚘, 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚊 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌̧𝚊 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚊. 𝚂𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜, 𝚗𝚘 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘, 𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚝𝚊 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚙𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝙲𝚕𝚊́𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚂𝚒𝚖𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘, 𝚓𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘-𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚘 𝚛𝚘𝚕 𝚊𝚌𝚛𝚒́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚟𝚒́𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚖 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚑𝚎 𝚘𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚊 𝚋𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚊 𝚊 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚊. 𝚄𝚖 𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎, 𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚊 𝚑𝚘𝚓𝚎, 𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚑𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚝𝚎́𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚘𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚎, 𝚎𝚖 𝚟𝚎𝚣 𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚊 𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚘 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚒𝚊 𝚗𝚎𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚣𝚒 𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚊𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚌̧𝚊 𝚎 𝚞𝚖 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖 𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚝𝚘 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚐𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚊̀ 𝚎𝚡𝚝𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚊-𝚍𝚒𝚛𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚊.

𝙴́ 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚕 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚋𝚘 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚌̧𝚊, 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚗𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚞 𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚊 𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚖𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚟𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚞 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚙𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚒𝚜.

* Estudante de sociologia deslocado para Coimbra e ativista interseccional

IN "ESQUERDA" -17/11/23 .