JOSÉ PACHECO PEREIRA

 .

Ponham-se a brincar

com a Ucrânia e

depois queixem-se

𝖤́ 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖾́ 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗋: 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈-𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈, 𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗑𝗈𝗎 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖤𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺.

𝖧𝖺́ 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺: 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗈𝖺-𝖿𝖾́, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺, 𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺́-𝖿𝖾́, 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖾𝗆, 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺. 𝖨𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗓𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗆-𝗌𝖾, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌. 𝖲𝗈́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾, 𝖺𝖼𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗆.

𝖠𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗈𝖺-𝖿𝖾́ 

𝖠𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗈𝖺-𝖿𝖾́, 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼̧𝖺 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺, 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗆, 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝗌𝖺𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌. 𝖤𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗆, 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗎𝗆 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗏𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈. 𝖤, 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝖯𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗇 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺. 𝖦𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌, 𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗑𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝖼𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌.

𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 “𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌” 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗆 𝖺̀ 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖥𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖱𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗑𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖯𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗇 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗆𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝗋𝗈𝗂𝗍 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖽 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺, 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺-𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠 𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖱𝖾𝗂𝗇𝗈 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖽𝗈.

𝖠 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗈𝖺-𝖿𝖾́, 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖾́ 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗋: 𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈-𝗅𝗁𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈, 𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗑𝗈𝗎 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖤𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺, 𝖺𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖺 𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾, 𝖺 𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈, 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗋 𝖺̀ 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖭𝖠𝖳𝖮 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝖼𝗅𝖾𝖺𝗋. 𝖯𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝗈𝗇𝗀𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 “𝗉𝖺𝗓” 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗋-𝗇𝗈𝗌-𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈.

𝖠𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺́-𝖿𝖾́ 

𝖲𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝖼𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖯𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗇, 𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 “𝗉𝖺𝗓”, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗎𝗓 𝗇𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺. 𝖮𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖺𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖣𝗎𝗀𝗂𝗇, 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝖺𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌. 𝖮 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗋, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠 𝖾 𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺, 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌, 𝖺 𝖱𝗎́𝗌𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝖢𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖺. 𝖲𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝖡𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗂𝗅 𝖾 𝖺 𝖨́𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗆-𝗌𝖾. 𝖥𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗍𝖺 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗁𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗌𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺. 𝖮 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗋𝖺́, 𝗇𝖺 𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗍𝖺, 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖠́𝖿𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝖠́𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖠𝗆𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖫𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 “𝖲𝗎𝗅 𝗀𝗅𝗈𝖻𝖺𝗅”, 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺.

𝖠𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈… …𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖠𝗆𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗂𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈 𝖩𝖺𝗉𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖲𝗎𝗅, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺. 𝖣𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝗈, 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗂́𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺, 𝗇𝖺 𝖯𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝗇𝖺 𝖧𝗎𝗇𝗀𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝗇𝖺 𝖤𝗌𝗅𝗈𝗏𝖺́𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖺, 𝗇𝖺 𝖳𝗎𝗋𝗊𝗎𝗂𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺. 𝖠 𝖭𝖠𝖳𝖮 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝗎 𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖤𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗇𝖺́𝗏𝗂𝖺, 𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝗆𝖺́𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖯𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗇 𝗍𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈. 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗃𝖺́.

𝖮 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠. 𝖭𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠, 𝖳𝗋𝗎𝗆𝗉 𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖺 𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝗈, 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖬𝖠𝖦𝖠, 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝗆 𝖻𝗅𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈. 𝖮 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖳𝗋𝗎𝗆𝗉 𝖾 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺-𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗉𝗈̂𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖴𝖼𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝖺, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗉𝗈̂𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺. 𝖠𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗂, 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗇𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖺 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝗈̃𝖾𝗆, 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖺, 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗎 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖤𝖴𝖠.

* Professor universitário, cronista, político, fundador de "EPHEMERA"

IN "SÁBADO" .