ANTÓNIO GALAMBA

.

Climínimos

O Estado democrático tem a obrigação de não desvalorizar nenhum tipo de abuso no exercício das liberdades, por mais meritórias que possam ser as motivações.

𝖠𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆. 𝖮 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗎𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗋𝗎𝗆𝗈, 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗇𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌. 𝖣𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈, 𝖾́ 𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗆.

𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗉𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖽𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗓𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖣𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖣𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈. 𝖣𝗂𝗀𝗈-𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗆𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖳𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗋, 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗆𝗈-𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖤𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗑𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖧𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺 (𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖯𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖡𝖺𝗂𝗑𝗈𝗌), 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺́𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝖺𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖤𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗑𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖠𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗋𝗈́𝗅𝖾𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖳𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖨𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗇𝖾́𝗌𝗂𝖺, 𝖾 𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺́𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌, 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗏𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖨𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗇𝖾́𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖤𝖷𝖯𝖮 𝟫𝟤, 𝖾𝗆 𝖲𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌.

𝖤𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗈 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖻𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗅𝗎𝗍𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗈𝖻𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌. 𝖮 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗎𝗆 𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝖻𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗅𝖺𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗉𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖺𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌.

𝖲𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖽𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝖺́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗇𝖺 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖺 𝗆𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝗇𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗎𝖽𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈̃𝖾𝗆 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌. 𝖠𝖼𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗋 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖿𝗈́𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗂𝗌. 𝖠𝖼𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗋 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗆. 𝖠𝖼𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗋 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗈. 𝖠𝖼𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗋 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈. 𝖠𝖼𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗋 𝗃𝖺́, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗌𝖾𝗎𝖽𝗈-𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗎𝗆 𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗑𝗂𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗋𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗌𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖺. 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖿𝗋𝗎𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗏𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗓𝖾𝗋𝗈.

𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗂𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗁𝗈𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾́ 𝗓𝖾𝗋𝗈. 𝖩𝖺́ 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝖺𝗌, 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝗌𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗂́𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝗀𝗎́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝗈𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖤́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝖺̂𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌, 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅 𝖿𝗅𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗓 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌, 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌, 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖴𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗉𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅, 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗈, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗈 𝗅𝗎𝗑𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌, 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎 𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝗓 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝗂𝗀𝗂𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝗈𝗎 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗆𝖺𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗂. 𝖴𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗂-𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝗀𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗈.

𝖩𝖺́ 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗓𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗁𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗏𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗂𝗌𝖺 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗎𝗅𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖺𝗆𝖻𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅. 𝖤́ 𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗓𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖺́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝗆𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾. 𝖧𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗓𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖧𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝖽𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗂́𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌. 𝖠𝗍𝖾́ 𝗅𝖺́, 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗂 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌.

𝖭𝖮𝖳𝖠𝖲 𝖥𝖨𝖭𝖠𝖨𝖲

𝖤𝖫𝖤𝖨𝖳𝖮𝖱𝖠𝖣𝖮, 𝖤𝖭𝖳𝖱𝖤 𝖮𝖲 𝖠𝖥𝖠𝖦𝖠𝖣𝖮𝖲, 𝖮𝖲 𝖠𝖫𝖧𝖤𝖠𝖣𝖮𝖲 𝖤 𝖮𝖲 𝖠𝖡𝖠𝖭𝖣𝖮𝖭𝖠𝖣𝖮𝖲. 

𝖮 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗂́𝗏𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖮𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖾𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖺̂𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗎 𝖿𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗀𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺. 𝖮𝗌 𝖺𝖿𝖺𝗀𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗏𝗈𝗍𝗈, 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖮𝗌 𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗏𝖾𝗀𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗏𝗂𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈-𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝗏𝗈𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈𝗎 𝖺̀ 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗀𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌.

𝖮 𝖣𝖨𝖲𝖯𝖠𝖱𝖠𝖳𝖤 𝖣𝖠 𝖤𝖷𝖳𝖨𝖭𝖢̧𝖠̃𝖮 𝖣𝖮 𝖲𝖤𝖥. 

𝖠 𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗎𝗇𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗎𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈𝗌. 𝖤𝗑𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝗈 𝖲𝖤𝖥 𝗇𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗆𝖾𝖺𝖼̧𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗅 𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖾́𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗍𝗂́𝖽𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝖾̂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟣𝟩. 𝖥𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗆.

𝖣𝖠 𝖨𝖭𝖢𝖠𝖯𝖠𝖢𝖨𝖣𝖠𝖣𝖤 𝖯𝖠𝖱𝖠 𝖥𝖠𝖹𝖤𝖱. 

𝖲𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖯𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗈𝗌 𝖬𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝖯𝖱𝖱 𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝖦𝖣 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟤. 𝖴𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖤 𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗂 𝖭𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗋, 𝖾𝗆 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟥.

* Jurista, deputado à AR, partido Socialista.

.
IN "JORNAL "iN" - 24/10/23 .

.