JORGE FONSECA DE ALMEIDA

 .

AGNÓSTICO

𝑺𝒐𝒖 𝒂𝒈𝒏𝒐́𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒐, 𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒉𝒐 𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒊𝒈𝒖𝒂𝒍 𝒄𝒆𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒆𝒎 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒂 𝒕𝒐𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒂𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒐̃𝒆𝒔 𝒆 𝒆𝒎 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒂𝒐 𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒊́𝒔𝒎𝒐. 𝑵𝒂̃𝒐 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒔𝒊́𝒗𝒆𝒍 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒂𝒓 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒂𝒍𝒈𝒐 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒆𝒙𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒔𝒐𝒖 𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒖. 𝑵𝒂̃𝒐 𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒂𝒕𝒆́ 𝒉𝒐𝒋𝒆, 𝒂𝒑𝒆𝒔𝒂𝒓 𝒅𝒐 𝒆𝒔𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒄̧𝒐 𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒎𝒆𝒍𝒉𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒔 𝒆 𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒑𝒊𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒔 𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒅𝒂 𝒉𝒖𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆, 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒂𝒓 𝒂 𝒆𝒙𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒆̂𝒏𝒄𝒊𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒍𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒓 𝒅𝒆𝒖𝒔 𝒑𝒐𝒓 𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒐𝒓 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒔𝒆𝒋𝒂, 𝒕𝒂𝒎𝒃𝒆́𝒎 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒔𝒐𝒖 𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆. 𝑺𝒐𝒖, 𝒑𝒐𝒊𝒔, 𝒂𝒈𝒏𝒐́𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒐.

𝑬𝒔𝒕𝒆 𝒂𝒈𝒏𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒎𝒆 𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒆𝒅𝒆 𝒅𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒓 𝒆𝒎 𝒎𝒖𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒄𝒐𝒎 𝒐 𝒉𝒖𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂̃𝒐 / 𝒎𝒖𝒄̧𝒖𝒍𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒐 / 𝒃𝒖𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂 𝒆𝒎 𝒎𝒖𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒐𝒔, 𝒆𝒎𝒃𝒐𝒓𝒂 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒊𝒓𝒂, 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒂𝒍𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆, 𝒐 𝒉𝒖𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒍𝒂𝒊𝒄𝒐 𝒆 𝒎𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂. 𝑻𝒂𝒎𝒃𝒆́𝒎 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒎𝒆 𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒆𝒅𝒆 𝒅𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒓 𝒄𝒐𝒎 𝒗𝒂́𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒔 𝒆𝒔𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒐 𝑷𝒂𝒑𝒂 𝑭𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒄𝒐, 𝒏𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒍𝒂𝒔𝒎𝒂𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝒏𝒂 𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒊́𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂 𝑳𝒂𝒖𝒅𝒂𝒕𝒐 𝑺𝒊, 𝒏𝒐𝒎𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒆𝒏𝒅𝒆 𝒂 𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒊𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒂 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒆𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒅𝒂 𝒔𝒆 𝒅𝒆𝒗𝒆 𝒔𝒖𝒃𝒐𝒓𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒓 𝒂𝒐 𝒃𝒆𝒎 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒖𝒎 𝒆 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒐 𝒇𝒂𝒛 𝒅𝒆𝒗𝒆 𝒔𝒆𝒓 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒂 𝒆𝒎 𝒄𝒂𝒖𝒔𝒂. 𝑨𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒐 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒎𝒖𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒂𝒖𝒕𝒐 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒄𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒂𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝒄𝒂𝒕𝒐́𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒐𝒔 𝒔𝒆 𝒐𝒑𝒐̃𝒆𝒎 𝒂 𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒂 𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒊́𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂 𝒅𝒐 𝒔𝒆𝒖 𝑷𝒂𝒑𝒂.

𝑶 𝒎𝒆𝒖 𝒂𝒈𝒏𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒅𝒖𝒛-𝒔𝒆 𝒆𝒎 𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒐𝒍𝒊́𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒐𝒔 𝒏𝒂 𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒆𝒔𝒂 𝒅𝒂 𝒍𝒊𝒃𝒆𝒓𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆 𝒅𝒆 𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒕𝒐 𝒆 𝒏𝒂 𝒔𝒆𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒊𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒋𝒂𝒔 𝒅𝒐 𝑬𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒅𝒐. 𝑬𝒔𝒕𝒂 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒊𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒄𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒂𝒓-𝒔𝒆 𝒍𝒂𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐.

𝑬́, 𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒐, 𝒄𝒐𝒎 𝒑𝒓𝒆𝒐𝒄𝒖𝒑𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒗𝒆𝒋𝒐 𝒐 𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒐 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒐 𝒑𝒖́𝒃𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒐 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒐 𝑬𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒅𝒐 𝒄𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒍 𝒆 𝒎𝒖𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒔 𝑪𝒂̂𝒎𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒔 𝒎𝒖𝒏𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒑𝒂𝒊𝒔 𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒂̃𝒐 𝒂 𝒇𝒂𝒛𝒆𝒓 𝒏𝒂𝒔 𝑱𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒅𝒂 𝑱𝒖𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒆 𝑪𝒂𝒕𝒐́𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂, 𝒔𝒖𝒃𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒂𝒃𝒆𝒓𝒕𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝑰𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒋𝒂. 𝑪𝒍𝒂𝒓𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒄𝒐𝒓𝒅𝒐.

𝑶𝒔 𝒎𝒆𝒖𝒔 𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒅𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒎 𝒊𝒓 𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒂 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒛𝒂. 𝑶𝒔 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒐𝒔𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒎 𝒔𝒆𝒓 𝒑𝒂𝒈𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒆𝒍𝒐𝒔 𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒅𝒂 𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒐𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒐𝒔 𝒐𝒓𝒈𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒛𝒂 𝒆 𝒑𝒐𝒓 𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒎 𝒐𝒔 𝒇𝒓𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂.

𝑷𝒐𝒅𝒆𝒎 𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒆𝒙𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆𝒔 𝒑𝒐𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒔? 𝑷𝒐𝒅𝒆𝒎. 𝑨𝒕𝒓𝒂𝒆𝒎 𝒑𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒐𝒂𝒔 𝒂𝒐 𝒏𝒐𝒔𝒔𝒐 𝒑𝒂𝒊́𝒔? 𝑺𝒊𝒎. 𝑮𝒂𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒎 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒐 𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒔? 𝑴𝒖𝒊𝒕𝒐 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒂𝒗𝒆𝒍𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐. 𝑵𝒂̃𝒐 𝒆́ 𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒆, 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒐, 𝒂 𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒂̃𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒇𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒐. 𝑨 𝒒𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒂̃𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒇𝒖𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒆́ 𝒐 𝒆𝒏𝒗𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒐 𝒅𝒐 𝑬𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒅𝒐 𝒄𝒐𝒎 𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒂̃𝒐, 𝒅𝒊𝒔𝒄𝒓𝒊𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒐 𝒂𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒆 𝒐𝒔 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒐𝒔𝒐𝒔 (𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒖𝒔, 𝒂𝒈𝒏𝒐́𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒐𝒔 𝒆 𝒐𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒐𝒔𝒐𝒔 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐 𝒐𝒓𝒈𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒛𝒂𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝒆𝒎 𝒊𝒈𝒓𝒆𝒋𝒂𝒔).

𝑺𝒆, 𝒑𝒐𝒓 𝒂𝒄𝒂𝒔𝒐 𝒊𝒎𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒂́𝒗𝒆𝒍, 𝒐 𝑽𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒏𝒐 𝒏𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒆 𝒖𝒎𝒂 𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒖𝒏𝒂 𝒆𝒎 𝒕𝒓𝒐𝒄𝒂 𝒅𝒆 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒄𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒂𝒓𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒐 𝒄𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒓𝒆𝒍𝒊𝒈𝒊𝒂̃𝒐 𝒐𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒍 𝒅𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒊́𝒂𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒂𝒄𝒆𝒊𝒕𝒂𝒓? 𝑶𝒃𝒗𝒊𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒏𝒂̃𝒐. 𝑵𝒂̃𝒐 𝒆́ 𝒑𝒐𝒓 𝒂𝒍𝒈𝒖𝒎 𝒈𝒂𝒏𝒉𝒐 (𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒂𝒗𝒆𝒍𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆 𝒅𝒊𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒖𝒕𝒐, 𝒎𝒂𝒔 𝒎𝒆𝒔𝒎𝒐 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒇𝒐𝒔𝒔𝒆 𝒆𝒍𝒆𝒗𝒂𝒅𝒐) 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒅𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒎𝒐𝒔 𝒄𝒆𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝒏𝒐 𝒒𝒖𝒆 𝒕𝒐𝒄𝒂 𝒂𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒄𝒊́𝒑𝒊𝒐𝒔 𝒆 𝒗𝒂𝒍𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒔 𝒅𝒂 𝒏𝒐𝒔𝒔𝒂 𝒔𝒐𝒄𝒊𝒆𝒅𝒂𝒅𝒆.

𝑷𝒂𝒓𝒂 𝒄𝒖𝒎𝒖𝒍𝒐 𝒐𝒔 𝒎𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒏𝒂 𝒂́𝒓𝒆𝒂 𝒅𝒂 𝒈𝒓𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒆 𝑳𝒊𝒔𝒃𝒐𝒂, 𝒐𝒏𝒅𝒆 𝒗𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒆 𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒊𝒇𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒗𝒂 𝒅𝒂 𝒑𝒐𝒑𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒑𝒐𝒓𝒕𝒖𝒈𝒖𝒆𝒔𝒂, 𝒔𝒂̃𝒐 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒊𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒂𝒓𝒂 𝒐𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒂 𝒇𝒊𝒎 𝒅𝒆 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒎𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒓 𝒂 𝒍𝒊𝒗𝒓𝒆 𝒄𝒊𝒓𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒈𝒏𝒂𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒈𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒐𝒔, 𝒊𝒔𝒕𝒐 𝒆́ 𝒂 𝒍𝒊𝒗𝒓𝒆 𝒄𝒊𝒓𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝒋𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒔 𝒄𝒂𝒕𝒐́𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒐𝒔. 𝑨 𝒂𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒃𝒖𝒊𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒅𝒆 𝒅𝒊𝒓𝒆𝒊𝒕𝒐𝒔 𝒆𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒊𝒔 𝒂𝒐𝒔 𝒄𝒂𝒕𝒐́𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒐𝒔 𝒆́, 𝒏𝒂𝒕𝒖𝒓𝒂𝒍𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆, 𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒅𝒎𝒊𝒔𝒔𝒊́𝒗𝒆𝒍. 𝑨𝒕𝒆́ 𝒐 𝑷𝒂𝒑𝒂 𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒓𝒊𝒂 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒂.

𝑬𝒎 𝒔𝒖𝒎𝒂: 𝒏𝒂𝒅𝒂 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒂 𝒂𝒔 𝑱𝒐𝒓𝒏𝒂𝒅𝒂𝒔 𝒅𝒂 𝑱𝒖𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒆 𝒄𝒂𝒕𝒐́𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒂, 𝒕𝒖𝒅𝒐 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒂 𝒐 𝒔𝒆𝒖 𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒊𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒐 𝒑𝒆𝒍𝒐 𝑬𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒅𝒐 𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒓𝒂 𝒂𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒄̧𝒐̃𝒆𝒔 𝒅𝒆 𝒄𝒊𝒓𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒔 𝒆𝒎 𝒇𝒂𝒗𝒐𝒓 𝒅𝒂 𝒍𝒊𝒗𝒓𝒆 𝒄𝒊𝒓𝒄𝒖𝒍𝒂𝒄̧𝒂̃𝒐 𝒅𝒐𝒔 𝒄𝒂𝒕𝒐́𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒐𝒔.

* Economista, MBA. Autor de livros e artigos sobre Capital Social, Marketing, Fraude e Corrupção, Compliance e Corporate Governance. Consultor de gestão.

IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" 31/07/23 .