MÁRIO ALMEIDA

 .

Finalmente percebemos porque

saiu Pedro Nuno Santos?

Pedro Nuno Santos não quereria estar no Governo, para mais com a tutela da TAP, quando António Costa decidir renegar a sua posição, e a do Partido Socialista, e dar o dito por não dito sobre a TAP.

𝖲𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 “𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈𝗌”, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗋 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺́𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖮𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺-𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗆𝖺-𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺, 𝖺 𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈.

𝖤𝖿𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗂́𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗎𝗓 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝖿𝗅𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖢𝗁𝖾𝖿𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖾𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗉𝖺. 𝖯𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗆, 𝖺 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗎𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺𝗆 “𝖼𝖺𝗂𝗋”. 𝖮 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆-𝗌𝖾 “𝖾𝗌𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝖽𝗈” 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺.

𝖳𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 “𝗋𝖺́𝖻𝗎𝗅𝖺” 𝖽𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗎 𝖺̀ 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖳𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗈, 𝖠𝗅𝖾𝗑𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗋𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗂𝗌. 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖨𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝖧𝗎𝗀𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖬𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌, 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈, 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈, 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯 𝖽𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝗎𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗏𝗋𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈.

𝖢𝖺𝗎𝗌𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈, 𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖨𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖧𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈, 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆, 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖤 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾̂ 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺? “𝖤𝗇𝖿𝖺𝗇𝗍 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗅𝖾” 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖲𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝖯𝖾𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺. 𝖩𝖺́ 𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈, 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗎 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗂́𝖽𝖺, 𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗎 𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈. 𝖳𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗁𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝖺𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖫𝗂𝗌𝖻𝗈𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝗎𝖻𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖿𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖽𝖾́𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌. 𝖥𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈, 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝖮𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗈𝗀𝗈𝗎 𝗁𝗎𝗆𝗂𝗅𝖽𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝖼𝗁𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗇𝗂𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺. 𝖮𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗎𝗓𝗂𝖺-𝗌𝖾, 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗏𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗉𝗂𝗌𝗈́𝖽𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖻 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗍𝗎𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖺.

𝖤𝗇𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾̂ 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖯𝖾𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 “𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈” 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗂𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈?

𝖤𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝟤𝟫 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗎𝗀𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗎́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝖺̀ 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖺-𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺, 𝟣𝟣 𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆, 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺𝗀𝗎𝖺𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖥𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌, 𝖥𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖬𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗇𝖺, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖿𝗅𝖺𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝗎 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗅𝖾𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖠𝗅𝖾𝗑𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗋𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖳𝖾𝗌𝗈𝗎𝗋𝗈!

𝖮𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟣 𝖽𝖾 𝗃𝖺𝗇𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗎 𝖺 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯, 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 “𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗍𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅, 𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯”. 𝖫𝖾𝗎 𝖻𝖾𝗆? 𝖠𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖳𝖮𝖳𝖠𝖫 𝗈𝗎 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯. 𝖮 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗈 𝗁𝖺́𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗅𝖺𝗉𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗀𝖾́𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗈, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈! 𝖢𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗈𝗎 𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗎𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗋𝗂𝗎 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺, 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖲𝖣, 𝖫𝗎𝗂́𝗌 𝖬𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗋𝗈, 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗎. 𝖳𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝗈𝗎 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗅𝖾𝗑𝖺̃𝗈.

𝖳𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖺𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯, 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗓𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾̂𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋, 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈, 𝟧𝟣% 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝖾́𝗋𝖾𝖺! 𝖠𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗇𝗎́𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾́𝗏𝗂𝗈, 𝖺𝖽𝗆𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖾𝗇𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗅! 𝖠 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖯𝖾𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌. 𝖤 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗈 𝖾𝗑-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖠𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯. 𝖯𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗀𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌. 𝖬𝖺𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗏𝗂𝖼𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝖯𝖾𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗍𝗎𝗍𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗂𝗋 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖾 𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖲𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯.

𝖯𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖨𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖧𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈? 𝖲𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖯𝖾𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌!…

𝖳𝖠𝖯: 𝖠𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺…𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈!

𝖢𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗂́𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖯𝖾𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗏𝖺̃𝗈-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗉𝗂𝗌𝗈́𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 “𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗅𝖺” 𝖳𝖠𝖯. 𝖲𝖺𝖻𝖾-𝗌𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺, 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖿𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗂́𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗑𝗈 𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌𝗈 𝖯𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖱𝖾𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝗇𝖾𝗀𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖡𝗋𝗎𝗑𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌.

𝖠 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗈́𝗌𝗂𝗍𝗈, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾́ 𝖺 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺, 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝖯𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖱𝖾𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖤𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖨𝗇𝗊𝗎𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗋 𝗅𝗎𝗓 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖯𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈! 𝖩𝖺́ 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺, 𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗃𝖾𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗉𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾 𝟥,𝟤 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌. 𝖮𝗋𝖺 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖠𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝟥,𝟦 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌. 𝖥𝗈𝗂 𝗎𝗆 𝗅𝖺𝗉𝗌𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝖻𝖺𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋, 𝗈𝗎 𝗃𝖺́ “𝗏𝗈𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆” 𝗈𝗎 𝗏𝖺̃𝗈 “𝗏𝗈𝖺𝗋” 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝟤𝟢𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌?

𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖾𝗋𝖺, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾́𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖯𝖾𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌? 𝖲𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗑-𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖺𝖽𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖲𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝗈, 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟢𝟣. 𝖠𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗎 𝖺 𝖲𝖭 𝖡𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗅𝗌 𝖠𝗂𝗋𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗌, “𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺” 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖲𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖺, 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗌, 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗅𝗈𝗍𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗅. 𝖭𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖲𝖺𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖺, 𝖺 𝟩 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢𝟢𝟩, 𝖺

𝖲𝖭 𝖡𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗅𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖾-𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖵𝗂𝗋𝗀𝗂𝗇 𝖤𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌 𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝖡𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗅𝗌 𝖠𝗂𝗋𝗅𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗌.

𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯. 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾! 𝖳𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 “𝗅𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖺”, 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖯𝗅𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝖺𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋. 𝖱𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗂 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖡𝖤𝖲 𝖡𝗈𝗆 𝖾 𝗈 𝖡𝖤𝖲 𝖬𝖺𝗎. 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝗎 𝖯𝖾𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖺 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝖺𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈? 𝖲𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗌: 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗇𝖺 “𝗀𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗀𝗈𝗇𝖼̧𝖺”, 𝖾 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝖺 𝖠𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂𝗋 𝗈 𝖿𝗋𝖺𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺. 𝖯𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝟥,𝟤 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗋, 𝖾́ 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗉𝗎𝗋𝖾𝗓𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺, 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗀𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 (𝗃𝖺́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗂𝗅𝗈𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗌𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 “𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌” 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝖺𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗋 “𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌” 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺)!

𝖲𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗏𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖳𝖠𝖯 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖺𝖾́𝗋𝖾𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖾 𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 “𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗉𝖺𝗀𝗇𝗈𝗇𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝗈𝗎𝗍𝖾” (𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖻𝗅𝗈𝗊𝗎𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌) 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗈𝗋𝖻𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌. 𝖧𝗈𝗇𝗋𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝖯𝖾𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖭𝗎𝗇𝗈 𝖲𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝗌𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖲𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝗅𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝗏𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅.

* Politólogo

IN "iN"-17/01/23 .