JOSÉ SOEIRO

 .

Santos Silva,

o pai tirano?

A ideia de que uma pessoa de 16 anos deve ser tratada como cidadã pelo fisco, pelo patrão e pelas forças armadas, mas que não o seja aos olhos da democracia é, essa sim, de um insuportável paternalismo.

𝐴𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑆𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑆𝑖𝑙𝑣𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑢-𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟼 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 “𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑣𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 (𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑘 𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙)”. 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 “𝑎𝑖 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑚, 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑜𝑠, 𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑖𝑟 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟”. 𝐴𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑆𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑆𝑖𝑙𝑣𝑎, 𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝟷𝟼 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑠 "𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑧𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑜𝑠" 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 “𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑜𝑠” 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑗𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑠. 𝑆𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑜𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟼 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑆𝑖𝑙𝑣𝑎, 𝑛𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝘩𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑧 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜. 𝐸 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑔𝑎𝑛𝘩𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠.

𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑖́𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠

𝑆𝑒 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝟷𝟼 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑟 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝘩𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑧 𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝘩𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑎𝑧 𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠?

𝑆𝑒 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝟷𝟼 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜? 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑖𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑆𝑖𝑙𝑣𝑎. 𝐴𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑗𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑜 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑜. 𝑆𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑎̃𝑜𝑠. 𝐺𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎 𝑇𝘩𝑢𝑛𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑔 𝑒 𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑎, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜, 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑎𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑜𝑠. 𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑢 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑗𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑚 – 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎́𝑠, 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑗𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 – 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑜̂𝑟 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑝𝑠𝑜 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜. 𝐴𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑎𝑚 𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑚 𝑜 𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑘 𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝐿𝑖𝑠𝑏𝑜𝑎.

𝑄𝑢𝑒, 𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎, 𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑗𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑠, 𝑒́ 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑙. 𝑁𝑜́𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒. 𝑂 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝘩𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑗𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑗𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒.

𝐴 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜̃𝑒-𝑠𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜, 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎́𝑠. 𝑂𝑠 𝑗𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑚. 𝐷𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑎 𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑠, 𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑓𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 (𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠, 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑆𝑖𝑙𝑣𝑎 𝑓𝑒𝑧 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒). 𝐷𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠. 𝐷𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠.

𝑈𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎

𝐴 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝟷𝟼 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙. 𝑁𝑎 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎, 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝐴́𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑎, 𝑒𝑚 𝑀𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎, 𝑛𝑎 𝐼𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎, 𝑛𝑎 𝐸𝑠𝑐𝑜́𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑛𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑖́𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐺𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝐵𝑒́𝑙𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎. 𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎, 𝑎 𝐴𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑎, 𝑜 𝐸𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟, 𝐶𝑢𝑏𝑎, 𝑁𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑎́𝑔𝑢𝑎 𝑒 𝑜 𝐵𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑖𝑙 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑚. 𝐸𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝟷𝟼 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑡𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠. 𝐺𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑢, 𝑡𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜. 𝐹𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝘩𝑜. 𝐴𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑎?

𝐴 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟼 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑎̃ 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜, 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑙𝘩𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑒́, 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜. 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑖 𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑜.

* Dirigente do Bloco de Esquerda, sociólogo.

IN "EXPRESSO.PT" - 07/12/22 .