ANTÓNIO CLUNY

 .

As relações sociais, profissionais

familiares e pessoais

depois da pandemia e

do incremento do teletrabalho

O teletrabalho não deve ser levianamente diabolizado, pois, em muitas circunstâncias, ele pode contribuir para uma vida mais satisfatória nas cidades, nos empregos, nas famílias e no próprio plano pessoal … mas!

𝓐 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓪 𝓯𝓮𝔃 𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓷𝓬̧𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓮 𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮, 𝓼𝓾𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓶𝓾𝓭𝓸𝓾 𝓸𝓾 𝓲𝓷𝓯𝓵𝓾𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓾 𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪, 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵, 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓻 𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓪𝓻.

𝓔, 𝓷𝓪 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓪, 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓾𝓭𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸, 𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪.

𝓞 𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻, 𝓷𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸, 𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓼, 𝓮𝓶 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓻𝓬𝓾𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼, 𝓮𝓵𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲𝓻, 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓸, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓼𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓯𝓪𝓽𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼, 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓸𝓼, 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝓲́𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓷𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓵.

𝓔𝓵𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓮 𝓰𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓻 𝓶𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓻 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓸 𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓫𝓪́𝓼𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓶, 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸, 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓳𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻, 𝓷𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵.

𝓒𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸, 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼, 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶, 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸, 𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓪, 𝓮𝓵𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓮𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓫𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓾 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓻, 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶, 𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓼: 𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼𝓪 𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓾𝔁𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓮𝓼 𝓫𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓯𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓼.

𝓝𝓸 𝓹𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲𝓾, 𝓮𝓶 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓲𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼.

𝓜𝓾𝓭𝓸𝓾-𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓼 𝓸𝓼 𝓱𝓪́𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓾-𝓵𝓱𝓮𝓼 𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓪, 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 𝓷𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓪̀ 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮 𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓵𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓵.

𝓕𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓾, 𝓪𝓵𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼.

𝓣𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓽𝓮́ 𝓷𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓼𝓪𝓲́𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓼, 𝓶𝓪𝓼, 𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶-𝓼𝓮, 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓹𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓸, 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓶𝓸𝓭𝓸, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓾𝓷𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓸𝓫𝓳𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪.

𝓔𝓶 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓾 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓹𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓪 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓾𝓶𝓲𝓻, 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓼𝓲 𝓹𝓻𝓸́𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓼, 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓪𝓵𝓿𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓮́𝓿𝓲𝓪 𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓳𝓾𝓷𝓽𝓸, 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮 𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓬𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓫𝓳𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓶𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼.

𝓔́ 𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓾 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓸́𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓸, 𝓸𝓾 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓾 𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻, 𝓷𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓯𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓸́𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓫𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼.

𝓞 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓾𝓬𝓮𝓭𝓮𝓾 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓪 𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓰𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪, 𝓪𝓭𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓸𝓾 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪, 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓲𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓸𝓾.

𝓗𝓸𝓳𝓮, 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓸𝓼 𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓸𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓮𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓵𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪-𝓼𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓵 𝓮, 𝓮𝓶 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓪 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓪 𝓶𝓮́𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓷𝓪́𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓮, 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓸́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼, 𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓪𝓽𝓮́, 𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓪𝓫𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓸 𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓲́𝓿𝓮𝓵.

𝓐𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓱𝓪́𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓰𝓲𝓻 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓶, 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪, 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓾𝓽𝓲𝓪𝓶, 𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮-𝓪-𝓯𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓯𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓺𝓾𝓮𝔃𝓪, 𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓶 𝓷𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸.

𝓣𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓪 𝓯𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝔃𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓾𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓮𝓻 𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓬̧𝓪, 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓲𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓼𝓪 𝓮, 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪, 𝓪𝓼 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓾́𝓽𝓾𝓸𝓼.

𝓠𝓾𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪-𝓼𝓮, 𝓸𝓾 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓪 𝓹𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓪, 𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓲𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓮́𝓭𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓾𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝓿𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮 𝓪 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓶 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓷𝓪𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓵.

𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓱𝓪́𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓪 𝓼𝓾𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓵 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸, 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓲𝓷𝓪.

𝓟𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓮𝓶, 𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓾𝓶𝓪, 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓻, 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓪 𝓸𝓻𝓰𝓪𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓵𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓰𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓾𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮́𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓭𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓪𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓹𝓪𝓼 – 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵 – 𝓪𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸.

𝓝𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓼𝓸, 𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓼, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓵𝓲𝓿𝓻𝓮 𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵.

𝓟𝓸𝓻 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓷𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮 𝓪̀ 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓵 𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓻, 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓾, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓫𝓮𝓶 𝓮 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓵, 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮.

𝓢𝓮, 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪́ 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓸𝔁𝓲𝓶𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓮𝓶 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓸𝓼, 𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓮𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓵𝓪𝓬̧𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼; 𝓷𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼, 𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓱𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓳𝓪́ 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪́ 𝓮𝔁𝓪𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓫𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼.

𝓝𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓪 𝓰𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓼𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸𝓼, 𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓪̀ 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓮 𝓼𝓾́𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓵𝓸𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓵𝓲𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪, 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪 𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓾𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓾, 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓫𝓾𝓲́𝓭𝓸, 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶, 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓸𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝓲́𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓼.

𝓟𝓸𝓻 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓾𝓪𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝓲́𝓵𝓲𝓪 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪́ 𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓪, 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓮 𝓪𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸, 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶, 𝓪𝓼 𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓸𝓶𝓮́𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼, 𝓮 𝓸 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪, 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓯𝓪𝓼𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪̃𝓸, 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸, 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓼𝓾𝓻𝓰𝓲𝓭𝓸.

𝓞 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓪𝓵 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓸𝓾 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝓿𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓮𝓾 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸, 𝓪𝓵𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓻𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓪, 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪́ 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓪𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓾𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓾𝓶 𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓪𝓬̧𝓸 – 𝓾𝓶 𝓽𝓮́𝓭𝓲𝓸 - 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓲𝓷𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸.

𝓝𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓸𝓾, 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓼, 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓵𝓲𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓾𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪̃𝓸 𝓽𝓸𝓵𝓱𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓯𝓪́𝓬𝓲𝓵 𝓪̀ 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓵 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪.

𝓣𝓪𝓵 𝓪𝓵𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓵 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪́ 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓯𝓻𝓪𝓾𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝔁𝓹𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓯𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸 𝓸𝓾 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮, 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓻, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓾 𝓶𝓸𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓱𝓪́𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓪̀ 𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓪.

𝓣𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓵, 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓱𝓪́𝓫𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓶𝓾𝓭𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸.

𝓓𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓵𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓲𝓾 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓰𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓮𝓵𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓳𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓾𝓷𝓼 𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸𝓼: 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓵𝓮 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓵𝓲𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓻 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓸𝓾.

𝓔𝓶 𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸𝓼, 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓾 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓪 𝓮 𝓪̀ 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪 𝓾𝓶 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓲𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵.

𝓟𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓼, 𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼, 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓲𝓿𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓵𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓵 𝓮𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓸𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓷𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓫𝓲𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓰𝓾𝓲𝓪𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝓻.

𝓝𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓪𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓪̀ 𝓷𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮, 𝓪𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓶-𝓼𝓮 𝓮 𝓱𝓲𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓪𝓶-𝓼𝓮, 𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓼, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓯𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓲𝓼, 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓻𝓮𝓼 𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓬𝓾𝓳𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮 𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓵𝓬𝓪𝓷𝓬̧𝓪́𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓸𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮.

𝓟𝓻𝓸𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓻, 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸, 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓪𝓻 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓫𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓳𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓵𝓪𝓫𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓻𝓪𝔃𝓸𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓲𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓲𝓻 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓶, 𝓷𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓶𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸, 𝓼𝓮𝓻, 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶, 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓸𝓬𝓾𝓹𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓪.

𝓤𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓸𝓬𝓾𝓹𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓻 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓵𝓲𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓪 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪, 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶, 𝓵𝓲𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓭𝓸𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓲𝓸 𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓼𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓪𝓬̧𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓻 𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓰𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓻, 𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓸𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓵, 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓯𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵, 𝓯𝓪𝓶𝓲𝓵𝓲𝓪𝓻 𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓪𝓵.

𝓝𝓸 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸, 𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓸𝓫𝓳𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓹𝓪𝓵 𝓮𝓷𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓻 𝓼𝓸𝓵𝓾𝓬̧𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓹𝓮𝓶 𝓸 𝓱𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓶 𝓮 𝓵𝓲𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓪 𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓪𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸𝓼 𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓮𝓶 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓶.

𝓝𝓾𝓶 𝓶𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓲𝔃𝓪 – 𝓮 𝓫𝓮𝓶 – 𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓬̧𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓵𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸, 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓿𝓮́𝓶 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓪 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼.

* Magistrado do Ministério Público

IN

05/07/22.