JOANA MORTÁGUA

  .

Contra a inclusão de

um juíz retrógrado

no Tribunal Constitucional

O manifesto afirma o que todas pensamos: não podemos aceitar para juiz do Tribunal Constitucional “que nos faz sentir a mesma vergonha que paira sobre o Supremo Tribunal dos EUA”.

𝐻𝑎́ 𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑎𝑠, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎.

𝐿𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑢 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑠 “𝑡𝑒́𝑐𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠” 𝑎𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑆𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎. 𝐴 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑜 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑧 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎, 𝑐𝑎𝑖𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑖𝑟. 𝐴𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑎. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑟.

𝑆𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 ℎ𝑎́ 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑠, 𝑜𝑠 𝑗𝑢𝑖́𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚-𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑜𝑝𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐴𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑢 𝑒𝑚 𝟷𝟿𝟾𝟺 𝑞𝑢𝑒 “𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑚, 𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 ‘𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠’ - 𝑛𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎𝑧𝑖𝑠”. 𝐴𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝟷𝟿𝟾𝟺 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟, 𝑒́ 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝐿𝑒𝑖 𝑛.º 𝟼/𝟾𝟺, 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟷 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑢 “𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑧”, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑢𝑚 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑎 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙.

𝐴 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑖𝑢 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑢𝑚 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑜. 𝐴𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 “𝑀𝑒𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑝𝑜, 𝑚𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜!”, 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑖́𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑠, 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠. 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑎 𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑀𝑢𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝐽𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑐̧𝑜𝑢 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑎-𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑜 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑢𝑚 𝑗𝑢𝑖𝑧 𝑞𝑢𝑒 "𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑧, 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑜𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑠 ‘𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠’ 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑔𝑟𝑎́𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 (...)”.

𝑂 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑗𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠: “𝑆𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑎-𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎, 𝑎̀𝑠 𝟷𝟾ℎ𝟹𝟶 𝑗𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎-𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑛𝑜́𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝐿𝑖𝑠𝑏𝑜𝑎 (𝑛𝑜 𝐶ℎ𝑎𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑧 𝑑𝑎 𝑅𝑢𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑂 𝑆𝑒́𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑜) 𝑒 𝑛𝑜 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑜 (𝐶𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎, 𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙) 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐴𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑖𝑧 𝑑𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙”.

𝑂 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠: 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑖𝑧 𝑑𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 “𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑎𝑧 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑜 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴”. 𝐴𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑗𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠, “𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑖𝑙 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑗𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎" 𝑑𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙.

𝑄𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑧𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑆𝑖𝑚 𝑛𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑢 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎. 𝑆𝑎𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑟𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑏𝑜́𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑜: “𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑜, 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑖́𝑡𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙. 𝑁𝑒𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑠!”

𝑂 𝑆𝑢𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝐸𝑈𝐴 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑜́𝑟𝑑𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝟷𝟿𝟽𝟹 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑢 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑧 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙. 𝐸𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑜 𝐴𝑡𝑙𝑎̂𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑐𝑎́ 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑟.

* Deputada à AR pelo Bloco de Esquerda

IN "iN" - 19/05/22 .