ADÃO CARVALHO

 .

O Tribunal Penal Internacional

 e a invasão da Ucrânia

Independentemente das investigações que possam ser iniciadas quanto a eventuais crimes de guerra ou contra a humanidade, a questão que se coloca é porque não é aberta uma investigação quanto ao crime de agressão, aquele que na nossa perspetiva, pareceria mais evidente na situação concreta.

𝒪 𝒫𝓇𝑜𝒸𝓊𝓇𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇-𝒢𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓁 𝒹𝑜 𝒯𝓇𝒾𝒷𝓊𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝒫𝑒𝓃𝒶𝓁 ℐ𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝓁 (𝒯𝒫ℐ), 𝒦𝒶𝓇𝒾𝓂 𝒜.𝒜. 𝒦𝒽𝒶𝓃 𝒬𝒞, 𝒶𝓃𝓊𝓃𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓊 𝒶 𝟸𝟾 𝒹𝑒 𝒻𝑒𝓋𝑒𝓇𝑒𝒾𝓇𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒾𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝓈𝑜𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝒶𝑜 𝒿𝓊𝒾́𝓏𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒾𝓃𝓈𝓉𝓇𝓊𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝓉𝓇𝒾𝒷𝓊𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝒶𝓊𝓉𝑜𝓇𝒾𝓏𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶𝒷𝓇𝒾𝓇 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒾𝑔𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 𝒶 𝓈𝒾𝓉𝓊𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓃𝒶 𝒰𝒸𝓇𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒶, 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒷𝒶𝓈𝑒 𝑒𝓂 𝒾𝓃𝒻𝑜𝓇𝓂𝒶𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝓇𝑒𝒸𝑒𝒷𝒾𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝟹𝟿 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒷𝒶𝓈𝑒 𝓃𝒶𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒾𝓇 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒷𝒶𝓈𝑒 𝓇𝒶𝓏𝑜𝒶́𝓋𝑒𝓁 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶𝒸𝓇𝑒𝒹𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓊𝓂𝒾́𝓋𝑒𝒾𝓈 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝑒 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝒽𝓊𝓂𝒶𝓃𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝓉𝑒̂𝓂 𝓈𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓃𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓁𝑒 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈.

𝒪 𝒯𝒫ℐ 𝒻𝑜𝒾 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓊𝓂 𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓂𝓊𝓁𝓉𝒾𝓁𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓁 (𝑜 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓉𝓊𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑒 ℛ𝑜𝓂𝒶) 𝑒 𝒾𝓃𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓁𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝑒𝓂 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟸 𝑒𝓂 ℋ𝒶𝒾𝒶, 𝒫𝒶𝒾́𝓈𝑒𝓈 ℬ𝒶𝒾𝓍𝑜𝓈, 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓉𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒿𝓊𝓁𝑔𝒶𝓇 𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶𝒻𝑒𝓉𝒶𝓂 𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝓃𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓊 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒿𝓊𝓃𝓉𝑜, 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝓃𝑜𝒸𝒾́𝒹𝒾𝑜, 𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶, 𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝒽𝓊𝓂𝒶𝓃𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝑒 𝑜 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶̃𝑜.

𝒮𝓊𝓇𝑔𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝓃𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝓅𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓇, 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝓋𝒾𝒶 𝒿𝓊𝒹𝒾𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁, 𝑜 𝒹𝒾𝓇𝑒𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝓋𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒶 𝒿𝓊𝓁𝑔𝒶𝓇 𝑒 𝓅𝓊𝓃𝒾𝓇 𝒾𝓃𝒹𝒾𝓋𝒾́𝒹𝓊𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝒾𝓈.

𝒫𝑒𝓈𝑒 𝑒𝓂𝒷𝑜𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝒾𝓈𝓉𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑜𝓈 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈, 𝒻𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒶𝒹𝒶 𝓃𝒶 𝒾𝒹𝑒𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒾𝒶, 𝑒𝓂 𝒶𝒸𝑒𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝓈𝑒𝑔𝓊𝒾𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒿𝓊𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒹𝒾𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓊𝓈 𝓃𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝒾𝓈, 𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝑒́ 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶 𝓃𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝓅𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒿𝓊𝒹𝒾𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝓁𝑒𝒾𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒶𝒸𝒶𝒷𝑜𝓊 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝑔𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓋𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝑒𝓇𝑜𝒹𝒾𝓇 𝒶 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒾𝒶 𝒿𝓊𝒹𝒾𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝒹𝑜𝓈 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈, 𝒶𝒷𝓇𝒾𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓂 𝒸𝒶𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒽𝑜 𝒶̀ 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓉𝓇𝒾𝒷𝓊𝓃𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒶𝒾𝓈.

ℱ𝑜𝒾, 𝓅𝑜𝓇𝑒́𝓂, 𝒶 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝓂𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝒶𝓂𝓅𝓁𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓈𝑜 𝑒́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜 𝒻𝒶𝓋𝑜𝓇𝒶́𝓋𝑒𝓁 𝒶̀ 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓃𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝓅𝑒𝓉𝓇𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝒷𝓁𝑜𝒸𝑜 𝓃𝒶𝓏𝒾 𝓃𝒶 ℐℐ 𝒢𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 ℳ𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝑒𝓋𝑒 𝓃𝒶 𝒷𝒶𝓈𝑒 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝑔𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑜𝓈 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈, 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶̃𝑜, 𝓃𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝓂𝒶𝓉𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝒶.

𝒜 𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓋𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑜 𝒯𝓇𝒾𝒷𝓊𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝒹𝑒 𝒩𝓊𝓇𝑒𝓂𝒷𝑒𝓇𝑔𝒶 (𝓉𝓇𝒾𝒷𝓊𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝒶𝒹 𝒽𝑜𝒸) 𝓉𝑒𝓋𝑒 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝑒𝓃𝑜𝓇𝓂𝑒 𝓇𝑒𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒸𝓊𝓈𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓃𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓋𝑜𝓁𝓋𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝑒 𝓃𝒶 𝒶𝒻𝒾𝓇𝓂𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝒾𝒹𝑒𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝓃𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝓉𝓇𝒾𝒷𝓊𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓃𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒, 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶𝓁𝑒́𝓂 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝓃𝑜𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒫𝓇𝒾𝓃𝒸𝒾́𝓅𝒾𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒩𝓊𝓇𝑒𝓂𝒷𝑒𝓇𝑔𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝒶𝑔𝓇𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓃𝒶 𝒞𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑒 𝒯𝓇𝒾𝒷𝓊𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒽𝑒𝒸𝒾𝒹𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒾𝓁𝒶𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝒻𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝒿𝓊𝓈𝓉𝒾𝒸̧𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝓁.

ℐ𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒾𝑔𝒶𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓅𝑜𝓈𝓈𝒶𝓂 𝓈𝑒𝓇 𝒾𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒾𝒶𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝒶 𝑒𝓋𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓊𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝑜𝓊 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝒽𝓊𝓂𝒶𝓃𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒, 𝓉𝒶𝓁 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝒶𝓃𝓊𝓃𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓊 𝑜 𝒫𝓇𝑜𝒸𝓊𝓇𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇-𝒢𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓁, 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒹𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒶𝓃𝑜𝓈, 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒾𝒻𝒾𝒸𝓊𝓁𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒𝓈 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓊𝓁𝓉𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓂𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓅𝑜𝓃𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒾𝓁𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒾𝓃𝒹𝒾𝓋𝒾𝒹𝓊𝒶𝓁, 𝒹𝒶 𝒹𝒾𝒻𝒾𝒸𝓊𝓁𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝑜𝒷𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓋𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝓇𝑒𝒹𝒾́𝓋𝑒𝒾𝓈 𝑒𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓍𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝑒 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝒾𝒻𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒹𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓈𝓊𝒷𝓈𝒾𝓈𝓉𝑒𝓂 𝓃𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝑜́𝓅𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓈 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈-𝒫𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝒶̀ 𝓈𝓊𝒷𝓈𝓊𝓃𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒹𝓊𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓋𝒾𝓈𝓉𝑜𝓈, 𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶̃𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓈𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓁𝑜𝒸𝒶 𝑒́ 𝓅𝑜𝓇𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝒶𝒷𝑒𝓇𝓉𝒶 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒾𝑔𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝒶𝑜 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶̃𝑜, 𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓁𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓃𝒶 𝓃𝑜𝓈𝓈𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝓈𝓅𝑒𝓉𝒾𝓋𝒶, 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝑒𝓋𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝓃𝒶 𝓈𝒾𝓉𝓊𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒸𝓇𝑒𝓉𝒶.

𝒩𝒶̃𝑜 𝑜𝒷𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒿𝒶́ 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓋𝒾𝓈𝓉𝑜 𝓃𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 ℛ𝑜𝓂𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝒸𝒶𝒷𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓉𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑜 𝒯𝒫ℐ, 𝓈𝑜́ 𝑒𝓂 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟶, 𝓃𝒶 𝒞𝑜𝓃𝒻𝑒𝓇𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑒 ℛ𝑒𝓋𝒾𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒𝓂 𝒦𝒶𝓂𝓅𝒶𝓁𝒶, 𝓅𝒶𝓈𝓈𝑜𝓊 𝒶 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝒾𝓃𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝑜 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 – 𝑜 𝓅𝓁𝒶𝓃𝑒𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜, 𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜, 𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝒸𝒶𝒹𝑒𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝑜𝓊 𝒶 𝑒𝓍𝑒𝒸𝓊𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑜𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓈𝑒 𝑒𝓃𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑒 𝑒𝓂 𝓅𝑜𝓈𝒾𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑜𝓁𝒶𝓇 𝑜𝓊 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒹𝓊𝓏𝒾𝓇 𝒹𝑒 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝓂𝒶 𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓉𝒾𝓋𝒶 𝒶 𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝑜𝓊 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝒶𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒, 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓊 𝒸𝒶𝓇𝒶́𝓉𝑒𝓇, 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝒶 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓋𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝑒 𝒹𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓈𝒶̃𝑜, 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝓉𝒾𝓉𝓊𝒾 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓋𝒾𝑜𝓁𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓂𝒶𝓃𝒾𝒻𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝒞𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒩𝒶𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝒰𝓃𝒾𝒹𝒶𝓈.

𝒞𝒶𝒷𝑒𝓂 𝓃𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒸𝑒𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶̃𝑜, 𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒾𝓉𝑜́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝑜𝓊 𝑜 𝒶𝓉𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝑜 𝓂𝑒𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜, 𝑜𝓊 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓁𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇 𝑜𝒸𝓊𝓅𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇, 𝒶𝒾𝓃𝒹𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓉𝑒𝓂𝓅𝑜𝓇𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝒶, 𝒹𝑒𝒸𝑜𝓇𝓇𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝑜𝓊 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑒 𝒶𝓉𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒, 𝑜𝓊 𝒶 𝒶𝓃𝑒𝓍𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝓊𝓈𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶 𝒹𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒾𝓉𝑜́𝓇𝒾𝑜, 𝓃𝑜 𝓉𝑜𝒹𝑜 𝑜𝓊 𝑒𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒, 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜; 𝑜 𝒷𝑜𝓂𝒷𝒶𝓇𝒹𝑒𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒾𝓉𝑜́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜, 𝑜𝓊 𝑜 𝓊𝓈𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝒾𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇 𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓊𝓂 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒾𝓉𝑜́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜; 𝑜 𝒷𝓁𝑜𝓆𝓊𝑒𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝑜𝓊 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜; 𝑜 𝒶𝓉𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝒶𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶𝓈 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓉𝓇𝑒𝓈, 𝓃𝒶𝓋𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝑜𝓊 𝒶𝑒́𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓈, 𝑜𝓊 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝓂𝒶𝓇𝒾𝓃𝒽𝒶 𝓂𝑒𝓇𝒸𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝑒 𝒶 𝒶𝓋𝒾𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒸𝒾𝓋𝒾𝓁 𝒹𝑒 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜.

𝒩𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓇𝒶́ 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝑒 𝑜 𝒸𝒶𝓈𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒰𝒸𝓇𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶 ℛ𝓊́𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒶, 𝓅𝓁𝒶𝓃𝑒𝒶𝒹𝑜, 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶𝒹𝑜, 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝒸𝒶𝒹𝑒𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝑒𝒸𝓊𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝒫𝓇𝑒𝓈𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒱𝓁𝒶𝒹𝒾𝓂𝒾𝓇 𝒫𝓊𝓉𝒾𝓃?

𝒪 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝒷𝓁𝑒𝓂𝒶 𝑒́ 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶 𝒶𝒷𝑒𝓇𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝒾𝓃𝓆𝓊𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝒸𝓊𝓇𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇 𝒹𝑜 𝒯𝒫ℐ 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶́ 𝒹𝑒𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝓋𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒻𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒 𝒸𝑒𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒻𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝑜 𝒞𝑜𝓃𝓈𝑒𝓁𝒽𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒮𝑒𝑔𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒩𝒶𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝒰𝓃𝒾𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝑒𝓍𝒾𝓈𝓉𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝒶𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓋𝒾𝓈𝒶𝒹𝑜.

𝒯𝒶𝓁 𝓋𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒻𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒 𝒸𝑒𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒻𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒𝓍𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒾𝓇𝒶́ 𝓃𝑜 𝒸𝒶𝓈𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒸𝓇𝑒𝓉𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓇𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶 ℛ𝓊́𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒶 𝑒 𝒶 𝒞𝒽𝒾𝓃𝒶 𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜𝒾𝓈 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝒾𝓃𝒸𝑜 𝓂𝑒𝓂𝒷𝓇𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓃𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝑒 𝓉𝒶𝓁 𝒹𝑒𝒸𝒾𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝓊𝓅𝑜𝓇𝒶́ 𝓈𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓇𝑒 𝑜 𝓋𝑜𝓉𝑜 𝒻𝒶𝓋𝑜𝓇𝒶́𝓋𝑒𝓁 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓂𝑒𝓈𝓂𝑜𝓈.

𝒮𝑒𝓂 𝓉𝒶𝓁 𝓋𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒻𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝒞𝑜𝓃𝓈𝑒𝓁𝒽𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒮𝑒𝑔𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶 𝑜 𝒾𝓃𝓆𝓊𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝒶𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒶́ 𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝒾𝓃𝒾́𝒸𝒾𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝒾𝓈 𝓂𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝒶𝓅𝑜́𝓈 𝓃𝑜𝓉𝒾𝒻𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓉𝒶𝓁 𝒹𝑒𝒸𝒾𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓇𝒶́ 𝓈𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓇𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝓊𝓉𝑜𝓇𝒾𝓏𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒿𝓊𝒾𝓏 𝒹𝑒 𝒾𝓃𝓈𝓉𝓇𝓊𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝒽𝒶𝒿𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝒸𝒾𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒞𝑜𝓃𝓈𝑒𝓁𝒽𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒮𝑒𝑔𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶, 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒶́ 𝓈𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓇𝑒 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝒹𝒾𝓇 𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓊 𝒾𝓃𝒾́𝒸𝒾𝑜 𝑜𝓊 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓈𝓈𝑒𝒸𝓊𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾́𝑜𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑜𝓏𝑒 𝓂𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝓇𝑒𝓃𝑜𝓋𝒶́𝓋𝑒𝒾𝓈.

𝒩𝑜 𝓅𝓁𝒶𝓃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒿𝓊𝓈𝓉𝒾𝒸̧𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒶𝓁, 𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒾𝒻𝒾𝒸𝓊𝓁𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒯𝒫ℐ 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝒶𝒹𝓋𝑒̂𝓂 𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝑒𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓃𝑜𝓈 𝑒 𝓂𝑒́𝒹𝒾𝑜𝓈 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈, 𝒸𝓊𝒿𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝒸𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝒹𝒶𝓅𝓉𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒶 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝑒𝓇𝑜𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝑔𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓋𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒾𝒶, 𝓈𝑒 𝑒𝓃𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝑒𝓂 𝒸𝓊𝓇𝓈𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒷𝒶𝓈𝑒 𝑒𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓈𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓃𝑜𝓈 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝑜𝓊 𝓂𝑒𝓃𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝒸𝒾́𝒻𝒾𝒸𝑜𝓈, 𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝓈𝒾𝓂 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓈 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈, 𝑒𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒸𝓊𝓁𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓉𝑒̂𝓂 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓃𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝓃𝑜 𝒞𝑜𝓃𝓈𝑒𝓁𝒽𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒮𝑒𝑔𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶, 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝒸𝒶𝓈𝑜 𝒹𝒶 ℛ𝓊́𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒶.

𝒪𝓈 𝒶𝓉𝓊𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒶𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝑒𝒸𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓇𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶𝓋𝒶𝓁𝒾𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝒶 𝒸𝓇𝑒𝒹𝒾𝒷𝒾𝓁𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒶𝓁𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓋𝒶 𝒿𝓊𝒹𝒾𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝓅𝒶𝓏 𝑒 𝓈𝑒𝑔𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶 𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝑒 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝑜 𝑜𝒷𝒿𝑒𝓉𝒾𝓋𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝓁𝓊𝓉𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒.

* Presidente do SMMP - Sindicato dos Magistrados do Ministério Público 

 IN "VISÃO" - 07/03//22 .