.
Virão aí os Superministérios
de António Costa?
António Costa entrou para a História por chefiar o maior Governo de Portugal do pós-25 de abril, veremos se fará novamente História ao chefiar um dos Governos mais curtos.
𝓣𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓽𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓐𝓷𝓽𝓸́𝓷𝓲𝓸 𝓒𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓲𝓻𝓪́ 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓸 𝓟𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓡𝓮𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓾𝓶 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓾𝓶 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼, 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶 𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓢𝓾𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼.
𝓐 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓪. 𝓟𝓮𝓭𝓻𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓒𝓸𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸, 𝓮𝓶 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟏, 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓾 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓵 “𝓾𝓶 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓱𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓷𝓸” 𝓮 𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓾!
𝓕𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝟏𝟏 𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓻, 𝓭𝓮 𝓙𝓸𝓼𝓮́ 𝓢𝓸́𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝟏𝟔. 𝓟𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓬𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼, 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓾 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓸𝓾 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸. 𝓝𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓷𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓼𝓪, 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓸́𝓼-𝟐𝟓 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓵 𝓭𝓮 𝟕𝟒, 𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓾𝓬𝓸𝓼 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼.
𝓟𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓒𝓸𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓪̀𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓻𝓬𝓾𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸, 𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓜𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓵 𝓡𝓮𝓵𝓿𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓲́𝓭𝓪 𝓲𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓭𝓮 𝓟𝓪𝓾𝓵𝓸 𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓼, 𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓷𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓽𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓸𝓾 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝟏𝟒 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼. 𝓜𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶, 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓫𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓒𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓬𝓸 𝓢𝓲𝓵𝓿𝓪 (𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟓-𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟕) 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓶 𝟏𝟑 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼.
𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸, 𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓸 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸 (𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓪 𝓯𝓪𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓿𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓢𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸), 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪𝓼, 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸, 𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓮́𝓵𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼. 𝓕𝓸𝓲 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓟𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓒𝓸𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓽𝓸𝓾 𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸, 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓽𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓸 𝓪𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼, 𝓷𝓪 𝓫𝓾𝓼𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪.
𝓓𝓪𝓻 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓸 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼, 𝓯𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓮́ 𝓭𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓶𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪̀ 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪 𝓫𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓪 𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓹𝓾𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓐𝓷𝓭𝓻𝓮́ 𝓥𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝔃 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓼 “𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓼” – 𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓵 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼.
𝓐 𝓿𝓲𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓵𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓸𝓾 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓲𝓶 𝓭𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮 𝓮𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓮𝓵𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼.
𝓢𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓪𝓸 𝓫𝓸𝓶 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸, 𝓾𝓶 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓮́ 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓼, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓾𝓵𝓰𝓪𝓻𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓯𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼. 𝓐 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓸́𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓾 𝓮𝔁𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓸, 𝓸 𝓾́𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓐𝓷𝓽𝓸́𝓷𝓲𝓸 𝓒𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓢𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝟕𝟎 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼, 𝓬𝓪𝓲𝓾-𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓷𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓮 𝓷𝓪 𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼.
𝓞 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓪́𝓻𝓮𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓵𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓸𝓾 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓢𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸. 𝓞 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓲𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶, 𝓮́ 𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪.
𝓐 𝓮𝓼𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪, 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓬𝓪 𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓾𝓶 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸, 𝓮 𝓪 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓪, 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓓𝓾𝓻𝓪̃𝓸 𝓑𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓸𝓼𝓸 𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓪 𝓛𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓼 (𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟐-𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟓) 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓬𝓪 𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓸𝓹𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓷𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓪́𝓻𝓮𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮 𝓷𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓾𝓬𝓸 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪.
𝓡𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼, 𝓪 𝓽𝓲́𝓽𝓾𝓵𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓸, 𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓟𝓮𝓭𝓻𝓸 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓪 𝓛𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓷𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓢𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪, 𝓭𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓒𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓬𝓸 𝓢𝓲𝓵𝓿𝓪 (𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟎-𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟓), 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓼, 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓲́𝓼 – 𝓸 𝓒𝓒𝓑.
𝓐𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓱𝓸𝓳𝓮, 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓸́𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓟𝓮𝓭𝓻𝓸 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓪 𝓛𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓢𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓷𝓸́𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪.
* Politóloga
IN "iN" - 11/02/22 .
𝓣𝓮𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓽𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓐𝓷𝓽𝓸́𝓷𝓲𝓸 𝓒𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓲𝓻𝓪́ 𝓪𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓸 𝓟𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓡𝓮𝓹𝓾́𝓫𝓵𝓲𝓬𝓪 𝓾𝓶 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓾𝓶 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼, 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶 𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓢𝓾𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼.
𝓐 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓷𝓸𝓿𝓪. 𝓟𝓮𝓭𝓻𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓒𝓸𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸, 𝓮𝓶 𝟐𝟎𝟏𝟏, 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓾 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓹𝓪𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓵 “𝓾𝓶 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓱𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓷𝓸” 𝓮 𝓬𝓾𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓾!
𝓕𝓸𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝓬𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝟏𝟏 𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼, 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓻, 𝓭𝓮 𝓙𝓸𝓼𝓮́ 𝓢𝓸́𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓱𝓪 𝟏𝟔. 𝓟𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓼 𝓪𝓬𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼, 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓲𝓾 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓸𝓾 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸. 𝓝𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓪 𝓷𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓬𝓻𝓪𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓼𝓪, 𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓸́𝓼-𝟐𝟓 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓫𝓻𝓲𝓵 𝓭𝓮 𝟕𝟒, 𝓽𝓲𝓷𝓱𝓪𝓶 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓮𝓪𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓾𝓬𝓸𝓼 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼.
𝓟𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓒𝓸𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓪̀𝓼 𝓬𝓲𝓻𝓬𝓾𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼, 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸, 𝓭𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸 𝓜𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓮𝓵 𝓡𝓮𝓵𝓿𝓪𝓼 𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓼𝓪𝓲́𝓭𝓪 𝓲𝓻𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓸𝓰𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓭𝓮 𝓟𝓪𝓾𝓵𝓸 𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓼, 𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓲𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓻 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓷𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓻𝓮𝓿𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓽𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓰𝓸𝓻𝓭𝓪𝓻 𝓸 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓸𝓾 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝟏𝟒 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼. 𝓜𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶, 𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓪𝓼 𝓫𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓸 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓒𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓬𝓸 𝓢𝓲𝓵𝓿𝓪 (𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟓-𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟕) 𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓯𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓶 𝟏𝟑 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼.
𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓼𝓸 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓾𝓶 𝓹𝓸𝓼𝓼𝓪 𝓪𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸, 𝓵𝓸𝓰𝓸 𝓷𝓾𝓶 𝓼𝓸́ 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸 (𝓪𝓹𝓮𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓻 𝓪 𝓯𝓪𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓰𝓪𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓿𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓢𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸), 𝓹𝓮𝓵𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓮𝔁𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓪𝓼, 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓬𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓻 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸, 𝓽𝓸𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓿𝓮𝔃𝓮𝓼 𝓪𝓼 𝓭𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓼𝓸̃𝓮𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓮́𝓵𝓮𝓻𝓮𝓼. 𝓕𝓸𝓲 𝓼𝓸𝓫𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓸 𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓟𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓸𝓼 𝓒𝓸𝓮𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓽𝓸𝓾 𝓷𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓾 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸, 𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓲𝓷𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓽𝓪́𝓿𝓮𝓵 𝓸 𝓪𝓾𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼, 𝓷𝓪 𝓫𝓾𝓼𝓬𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪.
𝓓𝓪𝓻 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓪𝓸 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼, 𝓯𝓪𝔃𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓸 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓬𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓪 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪, 𝓮́ 𝓭𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓶𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪̀ 𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓪𝓰𝓸𝓰𝓲𝓪 𝓫𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓪 𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓹𝓾𝓵𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓐𝓷𝓭𝓻𝓮́ 𝓥𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓯𝓪𝔃 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓮𝓶𝓪 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓪𝓼 “𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓼” – 𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓻𝓪𝓷𝓭𝓸 𝓼𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓻𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓟𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓰𝓪𝓵 𝓽𝓮𝓶 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓰𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼.
𝓐 𝓿𝓲𝓻𝓽𝓾𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓵𝓾𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓸 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓸𝓾 𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓲𝓶 𝓭𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓮 𝓮𝓯𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓮̂𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓻 𝓮𝓵𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓭𝓪𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓹𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓶 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓼𝓮𝓾𝓼 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼.
𝓢𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓻𝓮𝓭𝓾𝔃𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓮𝓬𝓲𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓪𝓸 𝓫𝓸𝓶 𝓯𝓾𝓷𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸, 𝓾𝓶 𝓷𝓾́𝓶𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓿𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮́𝓶 𝓮́ 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓭𝓮𝓿𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓹𝓸𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓸, 𝓹𝓸𝓲𝓼, 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓿𝓾𝓵𝓰𝓪𝓻𝓲𝔃𝓪𝓻 𝓪 𝓯𝓲𝓰𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓭𝓸 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓮 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓹𝓮𝓽𝓲𝓿𝓸𝓼 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼. 𝓐 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓮 𝓹𝓻𝓸𝓹𝓸́𝓼𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪𝓻 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓾 𝓮𝔁𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓸, 𝓸 𝓾́𝓵𝓽𝓲𝓶𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓐𝓷𝓽𝓸́𝓷𝓲𝓸 𝓒𝓸𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓮 𝓢𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓻𝓪𝓶 𝟕𝟎 𝓶𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓸𝓼, 𝓬𝓪𝓲𝓾-𝓼𝓮 𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓷𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓪𝓰𝓮𝓻𝓸 𝓮 𝓷𝓪 𝓫𝓪𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓲𝓭𝓪𝓭𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓪𝓵𝓰𝓾𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓼.
𝓞 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓭𝓮𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓭𝓪 𝓪́𝓻𝓮𝓪 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪́ 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓵𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓪𝓸 𝓯𝓪𝓬𝓽𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓸𝓾 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓢𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸. 𝓞 𝓬𝓪𝓼𝓸 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓸𝓲𝓼𝓪𝓼 𝓼𝓪̃𝓸 𝓪𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓶, 𝓮́ 𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪.
𝓐 𝓮𝓼𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻𝓭𝓪, 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓬𝓪 𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓸 𝓾𝓶 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓸, 𝓮 𝓪 𝓭𝓲𝓻𝓮𝓲𝓽𝓪, 𝓬𝓸𝓶 𝓪 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓓𝓾𝓻𝓪̃𝓸 𝓑𝓪𝓻𝓻𝓸𝓼𝓸 𝓮 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓪 𝓛𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓼 (𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟐-𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟓) 𝓬𝓸𝓵𝓸𝓬𝓪 𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓭𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪 𝓷𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪𝓻𝓲𝓪 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸. 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪 𝓸𝓹𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮́ 𝓷𝓮𝓷𝓱𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓶𝓮́𝓻𝓲𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓪́𝓻𝓮𝓪 𝓮𝓶 𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓮 𝓷𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓪̃𝓸 𝓹𝓸𝓾𝓬𝓸 𝓾𝓶𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓷𝓬̧𝓪 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪𝓺𝓾𝓲𝓵𝓸 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓭𝓮 𝓼𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓮𝓷𝓿𝓸𝓵𝓿𝓲𝓭𝓸 𝓮𝓶 𝓽𝓮𝓻𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓹𝓸𝓵𝓲́𝓽𝓲𝓬𝓪𝓼 𝓮𝓶 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓪𝓻𝓪 𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪.
𝓡𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓮𝓶𝓸𝓼, 𝓪 𝓽𝓲́𝓽𝓾𝓵𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓮𝔁𝓮𝓶𝓹𝓵𝓸, 𝓸 𝓮𝔁𝓬𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮 𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓫𝓪𝓵𝓱𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓟𝓮𝓭𝓻𝓸 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓪 𝓛𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓷𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓸 𝓢𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪, 𝓭𝓸 𝓖𝓸𝓿𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓒𝓪𝓿𝓪𝓬𝓸 𝓢𝓲𝓵𝓿𝓪 (𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟎-𝟏𝟗𝟗𝟓), 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓻𝓮 𝓸𝓾𝓽𝓻𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓪𝓾𝓼𝓪𝓼, 𝓭𝓮𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓬𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓪 𝓬𝓸𝓷𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓾𝓬̧𝓪̃𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓶𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓲𝓶𝓹𝓸𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓮𝓼 𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓯𝓲́𝓬𝓲𝓸𝓼 𝓬𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓼 𝓭𝓸 𝓟𝓪𝓲́𝓼 – 𝓸 𝓒𝓒𝓑.
𝓐𝓲𝓷𝓭𝓪 𝓱𝓸𝓳𝓮, 𝓽𝓸𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓷𝓸́𝓼 𝓷𝓸𝓼 𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓪𝓶𝓸𝓼 𝓺𝓾𝓮 𝓟𝓮𝓭𝓻𝓸 𝓢𝓪𝓷𝓽𝓪𝓷𝓪 𝓛𝓸𝓹𝓮𝓼 𝓯𝓸𝓲 𝓢𝓮𝓬𝓻𝓮𝓽𝓪́𝓻𝓲𝓸 𝓭𝓮 𝓔𝓼𝓽𝓪𝓭𝓸 𝓭𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪, 𝓶𝓪𝓼 𝓬𝓮𝓻𝓽𝓪𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓽𝓮, 𝓶𝓾𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓮 𝓷𝓸́𝓼 𝓷𝓪̃𝓸 𝓼𝓮 𝓵𝓮𝓶𝓫𝓻𝓪 𝓼𝓮𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓭𝓸 𝓷𝓸𝓶𝓮 𝓭𝓮 𝓺𝓾𝓪𝓵𝓺𝓾𝓮𝓻 𝓾𝓶 𝓭𝓸𝓼 𝓜𝓲𝓷𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓻𝓸𝓼 𝓭𝓪 𝓒𝓾𝓵𝓽𝓾𝓻𝓪.
* Politóloga
IN "iN" - 11/02/22 .
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário