JOSÉ BOURDAIN

 .

Jornalistas, comentadores

 e populistas

Ora quem na sociedade portuguesa se encaixa mais neste perfil? Diria que o Presidente da República surge em 1º lugar, seguido do actual Primeiro-Ministro e da líder do BE, que dizem tudo e o seu contrário para agradar aos eleitores. Não vejo André Ventura fazer isto, como também não o vejo despir-se e ir a banhos para a comunicação social filmar e divulgar, ou tirar fotografias a toda a hora com tudo e todos, ou António Costa com a questão da Galp e da refinaria de Matosinhos ou como a líder do BE com as IPSS. 

𝒟𝑒𝓈𝒹𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝒸𝑒𝒾 𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶𝓇-𝓂𝑒 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶, 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝑜𝓊 𝓂𝑒𝓃𝑜𝓈 𝒽𝒶́ 𝟸𝟶 𝒶𝓃𝑜𝓈, 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒽𝑜 𝓋𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒻𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝑒𝓂 𝑔𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓁 𝒻𝒶𝓋𝑜𝓇𝑒𝒸𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶, 𝑒𝓂 𝑒𝓈𝓅𝑒𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝑜 𝒫𝒮 𝑒 𝑜 ℬℰ. 𝒜𝓅𝑜́𝓈 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓉𝑒𝓈𝑒 𝒹𝑒 ℳ𝑒𝓈𝓉𝓇𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 𝓋𝑜𝓉𝑜 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓉𝑒́𝑔𝒾𝒸𝑜 (𝒸𝓊𝒿𝑜 𝓉𝓇𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓁𝒽𝑜 𝒻𝑜𝒾 𝓅𝒾𝑜𝓃𝑒𝒾𝓇𝑜 𝒶 𝓃𝒾́𝓋𝑒𝓁 𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓁) 𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 “𝑒𝓁𝑒𝒾𝓉𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝒻𝒶𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓈𝓂𝒶” (𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓉𝑒𝓋𝑒 𝑒𝓃𝑜𝓇𝓂𝑒 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝒶𝒸𝓉𝑜 𝓃𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝓅𝑜𝓇𝓉𝓊𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓈𝒶 𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓃𝑔𝑒𝒾𝓇𝒶), 𝒻𝓊𝒾 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓋𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝒹𝒾𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓈𝑜𝓈 𝑜́𝓇𝑔𝒶̃𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁, 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓁𝑒𝓋𝒾𝓈𝑜̃𝑒𝓈, 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒻𝒶𝓁𝒶𝓇 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 𝑜 𝓂𝑒𝓊 𝓉𝓇𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓁𝒽𝑜. ℛ𝒶𝓅𝒾𝒹𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝒸𝑒𝒾 𝒶 𝓈𝑒𝓇 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓋𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜 𝓅𝓊𝓇𝑜 𝑒 𝒹𝓊𝓇𝑜.

𝒮𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒾 𝒶𝓁𝑔𝓊𝓂 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓁𝓊𝓂𝒷𝓇𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝓃𝒶 𝒶𝓁𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶, 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓉𝒾 𝑒𝓇𝓇𝑜𝓈, 𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓇𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝒸𝓊𝓇𝑒𝒾 𝓈𝑒𝓇 𝓈𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝑒 𝒾𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝓃𝒶 𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒽𝒶 𝑜𝓅𝒾𝓃𝒾𝒶̃𝑜. ℱ𝒾𝓏 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝑜𝓈 “𝟷%” 𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓋𝒶𝓂 𝒥𝑜𝓈𝑒́ 𝒮𝑜́𝒸𝓇𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝒶𝓁𝑒𝓇𝓉𝒶𝓋𝒶𝓂 𝒹𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒𝓇𝒶 𝓊𝓂 𝓅𝑒́𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓂𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒, 𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝒹𝑜𝓇 𝒹𝑒 𝒻𝒶𝓁𝓈𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒𝓈, 𝓃𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒻𝒶𝓈𝑒 𝑒𝓂 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒𝓁𝑒 𝑒𝓇𝒶 “𝑜 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝑜𝓇” 𝑒 𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜 𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒́ 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇 𝑒 𝒿𝑜𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶. ℐ𝓃𝒻𝑒𝓁𝒾𝓏𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒, 𝓋𝒾𝓋𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓈 𝒽𝑜𝒿𝑒 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓈𝒾𝓉𝓊𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓂𝑒𝓁𝒽𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒜𝓃𝓉𝑜́𝓃𝒾𝑜 𝒞𝑜𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝟹 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶 𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝓉𝓇𝑒𝓂𝒶-𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶𝓅𝑜𝒾𝒶𝓂 𝑜 𝒢𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝑜.

ℰ𝓁𝑒𝓈 𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒷𝑜𝓃𝓈 𝑒 𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜 𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓉𝑜 𝑒́ 𝓂𝒶𝓊 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 “𝟿𝟿%” 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒿𝑜𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈, 𝑜𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝓉𝑒̂𝓂 𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓋𝑒𝓇 𝑒 𝒶 𝑜𝒷𝓇𝒾𝑔𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓈𝑒𝓇 𝓈𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓈, 𝒾𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝒻𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝓂𝒶𝓈, 𝓁𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓋𝑒𝓁𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒, 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑜 𝓈𝒶̃𝑜. ℰ 𝓅𝑜𝓇𝓆𝓊𝑒̂? 𝒪𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓊𝓈 𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓇𝑒𝑔𝑜𝓈 𝑒 𝒶𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒸̧𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓂 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓈𝑜? ℰ́ 𝓅𝑜𝓇𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒́ 𝒻𝒶́𝒸𝒾𝓁 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝑜 𝓂𝑒𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝓁𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝒶𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓁𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒́ 𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓅𝒶𝑔𝒶𝓃𝒹𝒶 𝒹𝑜𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒? 𝒟𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓂 𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓊𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒹𝑜𝓈? 𝒬𝓊𝒶𝓁 𝒶 𝓇𝒶𝓏𝒶̃𝑜? ℰ𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒, 𝒻𝑜𝒾 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝓇𝒶𝓏𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓂𝑒 𝓁𝑒𝓋𝑜𝓊 𝒶 𝒶𝒻𝒶𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜. 𝒫𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝓈𝓉𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝒶𝓈 𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒽𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝒻𝒾𝓇𝓂𝒶𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈, 𝓋𝒶𝓂𝑜𝓈 𝒶𝑜𝓈 𝒻𝒶𝒸𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝒾𝓈 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓇𝑒 𝓂𝑒𝓁𝒽𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓂𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓈 𝑜𝓅𝒾𝓃𝒾𝑜̃𝑒𝓈:

𝒜 𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶 𝓈𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓇𝑒 𝓉𝑒𝓋𝑒 𝓃𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝓊𝓂 𝒻𝒶𝓈𝒸𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝒾𝒸̧𝑜. 𝒥𝒶́ 𝒻𝑜𝒾 𝑜 𝒞𝒟𝒮-𝒫𝒫, 𝒶𝑔𝑜𝓇𝒶 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝒞𝒽𝑒𝑔𝒶 𝑒 𝒜𝓃𝒹𝓇𝑒́ 𝒱𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶, 𝒶𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒫𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶. ℰ𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑒 𝒹𝒾𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓈𝒶𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝒾𝓃𝒾𝓇, 𝓅𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝑒́ 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝑒𝓍𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓁𝑜 “𝓊𝓂 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓂𝑜 𝓊𝓉𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓏𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝒶 𝒞𝒾𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝒫𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝑒𝓍𝓅𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓇 𝓅𝓇𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒶 𝑔𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝒜𝓂𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶 ℒ𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓃𝒶 𝒹𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒷𝑜𝒶 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝑜 𝓈𝑒́𝒸𝓊𝓁𝑜 𝒳𝒳”. ℐ𝓈𝓉𝑜 𝑒́, 𝓊𝓂 “𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒸𝑒𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒸𝒶𝓇𝒶𝒸𝓉𝑒𝓇𝒾𝓏𝒶 𝑜 𝓂𝑜𝒹𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝓊𝓂 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜 𝓊𝓈𝒶 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓉𝑒́𝑔𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝓇𝑒𝒸𝓊𝓇𝓈𝑜𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓉𝑒̂𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝑜𝒷𝒿𝑒𝒸𝓉𝒾𝓋𝑜 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝒶𝒹𝒶𝓇 𝑒 𝑜𝒷𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝑜 𝒶𝓅𝑜𝒾𝑜 𝑒 𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒻𝒾𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝓅𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓁𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒶𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒́𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝒸𝓊𝓇𝓈𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒́ 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝒶𝒹𝒶́𝓋𝑒𝓁 𝒶 𝓉𝑜𝒹𝑜𝓈, 𝓃𝑜 𝒻𝓊𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓂 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝒶𝑔𝓇𝒶𝒹𝒶𝓇 𝒶 𝓃𝒾𝓃𝑔𝓊𝑒́𝓂”.

𝒪𝓇𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓂 𝓃𝒶 𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝑒𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝑜𝓇𝓉𝓊𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓈𝒶 𝓈𝑒 𝑒𝓃𝒸𝒶𝒾𝓍𝒶 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝓃𝑒𝓈𝓉𝑒 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒻𝒾𝓁? 𝒟𝒾𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑜 𝒫𝓇𝑒𝓈𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝒶 ℛ𝑒𝓅𝓊́𝒷𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝓇𝑔𝑒 𝑒𝓂 𝟷º 𝓁𝓊𝑔𝒶𝓇, 𝓈𝑒𝑔𝓊𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒶𝒸𝓉𝓊𝒶𝓁 𝒫𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝒾𝓇𝑜-ℳ𝒾𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓉𝓇𝑜 𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝓁𝒾́𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝒹𝑜 ℬℰ, 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒹𝒾𝓏𝑒𝓂 𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜 𝑒 𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓊 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝒶𝒹𝒶𝓇 𝒶𝑜𝓈 𝑒𝓁𝑒𝒾𝓉𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈. 𝒩𝒶̃𝑜 𝓋𝑒𝒿𝑜 𝒜𝓃𝒹𝓇𝑒́ 𝒱𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶 𝒻𝒶𝓏𝑒𝓇 𝒾𝓈𝓉𝑜, 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝓉𝒶𝓂𝒷𝑒́𝓂 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑜 𝓋𝑒𝒿𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓅𝒾𝓇-𝓈𝑒 𝑒 𝒾𝓇 𝒶 𝒷𝒶𝓃𝒽𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝒻𝒾𝓁𝓂𝒶𝓇 𝑒 𝒹𝒾𝓋𝓊𝓁𝑔𝒶𝓇, 𝑜𝓊 𝓉𝒾𝓇𝒶𝓇 𝒻𝑜𝓉𝑜𝑔𝓇𝒶𝒻𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝒶 𝓉𝑜𝒹𝒶 𝒶 𝒽𝑜𝓇𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜 𝑒 𝓉𝑜𝒹𝑜𝓈, 𝑜𝓊 𝒜𝓃𝓉𝑜́𝓃𝒾𝑜 𝒞𝑜𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒢𝒶𝓁𝓅 𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝒻𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑒 ℳ𝒶𝓉𝑜𝓈𝒾𝓃𝒽𝑜𝓈 𝑜𝓊 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝒶 𝓁𝒾́𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝒹𝑜 ℬℰ 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶𝓈 ℐ𝒫𝒮𝒮 (𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓉𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝒶𝒷𝑜𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶 𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇 𝑒𝓍𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓇) 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒶𝑜 𝓂𝑒𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓂𝓅𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝓁𝒽𝑒 𝒹𝒶́ 𝒿𝑒𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝒶𝓉𝒶𝒸𝒶𝓇 𝑜 𝒢𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝑜. ℰ𝓃𝓉𝒶̃𝑜, 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝑔𝓊𝓃𝓉𝑜, 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓇𝒶𝓏𝒶̃𝑜 𝒽𝒶́ 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑜𝓃𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒿𝑜𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈?

ℬℰ 𝑒 𝒫𝒞𝒫 𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝓉𝓇𝑒𝓂𝒶-𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶 𝑒 𝑜 𝒞𝒽𝑒𝑔𝒶 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝓉𝓇𝑒𝓂𝒶-𝒹𝒾𝓇𝑒𝒾𝓉𝒶 (𝓋𝒶𝓁𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒾𝑔𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝒸𝒾𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜𝓈). ℰ𝓃𝓉𝒶̃𝑜, 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓇𝒶𝓏𝒶̃𝑜 𝒿𝑜𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝒶𝒷𝑜𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓂 𝑜 𝒞𝒽𝑒𝑔𝒶, 𝒹𝒾𝓏𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒́ 𝓊𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝑜𝒸𝓇𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜 𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝓉𝓇𝑒𝓂𝒶-𝒹𝒾𝓇𝑒𝒾𝓉𝒶, 𝑒 𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓉𝒶𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝑜𝒸𝓇𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜𝓈 𝑒 𝓁𝑒𝑔𝒾𝓉𝒾𝓂𝒶𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜𝓈 “𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝑜𝒸𝓇𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜𝓈” 𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝓉𝓇𝑒𝓂𝒶-𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝑜 ℬℰ 𝑒 𝑜 𝒫𝒞𝒫? 𝒫𝑜𝓇 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓇𝒶𝓏𝒶̃𝑜 𝒶 𝒶𝓊𝓉𝑜𝓇𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒́𝓂 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝓂𝒶𝓃𝒾𝓅𝓊𝓁𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒 𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒾𝓇𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓈? 𝒬𝓊𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝒶𝑜 𝒻𝒶𝒸𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒞𝒽𝑒𝑔𝒶 𝓈𝑒𝓇 𝓊𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝑜𝒸𝓇𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜, 𝑜 𝒯𝓇𝒾𝒷𝓊𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝒞𝑜𝓃𝓈𝓉𝒾𝓉𝓊𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝒿𝒶́ 𝓈𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓃𝓊𝓃𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓊 𝑒 𝓈𝑒 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓂 𝒻𝑜𝓈𝓈𝑒 𝑜 𝒞𝒽𝑒𝑔𝒶 𝒿𝒶́ 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒𝓍𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒾𝒶.

𝒜𝓁𝑔𝓊𝑒́𝓂 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝒶𝒸𝒶𝓈𝑜 𝒿𝒶́ 𝑜𝓊𝓋𝒾𝓊 𝒜𝓃𝒹𝓇𝑒́ 𝒱𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶 𝑒𝓁𝑜𝑔𝒾𝒶𝓇 𝑜𝓊 𝓁𝑒𝑔𝒾𝓉𝒾𝓂𝒶𝓇 𝑔𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝑜𝓃𝒹𝑒 𝓋𝒾𝑔𝑜𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝒹𝒾𝓉𝒶𝒹𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓈, 𝑜𝓃𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑜𝒶𝓈 𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝓂𝑜𝓇𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓇𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓂 𝑜𝓈 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓊𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝓉𝒶𝓁 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 ℬℰ 𝑒 𝒫𝒞𝒫 𝒶𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝒶 𝒞𝑜𝓇𝑒𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑜 𝒩𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑒? 𝒪𝓊 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝑔𝓇𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓂 𝓃𝒶𝓈 𝓇𝓊𝒶𝓈 𝓋𝑜𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝓂𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝒶𝑜 𝒫𝓇𝑒𝓈𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈 𝒾𝓇𝓂𝒶̃𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝑜 ℬ𝓇𝒶𝓈𝒾𝓁? 𝒪𝓊 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓂 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝑜𝒸𝓇𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈/𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝒶 𝒱𝑒𝓃𝑒𝓏𝓊𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝑒 𝒞𝓊𝒷𝒶? 𝒪𝓊 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒽𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑜𝒶𝓈? 𝒪𝓃𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶́ 𝒶 𝒾𝓈𝑒𝓃𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒 𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝑒𝓇𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓉𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒿𝑜𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈?

ℳ𝒶𝓂𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓊 ℬ𝒶 𝓉𝑒𝓂 𝓅𝑜𝓈𝒾𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝓅𝓊́𝒷𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒸𝒶𝒷𝑒𝓂 𝓃𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝒾𝓃𝒾𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝓇𝒶𝒸𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶. ℰ́ 𝒾𝓃𝒶𝒸𝓇𝑒𝒹𝒾𝓉𝒶́𝓋𝑒𝓁 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑜𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓂𝑜𝓋𝑒 𝑜 𝓇𝒶𝒸𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶́ 𝒶̀ 𝒻𝓇𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝓊𝓅𝑜𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒶𝓃𝓉𝒾-𝓇𝒶𝒸𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝑒 𝒶𝒾𝓃𝒹𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝒸𝑒𝒷𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓋𝒾𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝑜 𝒫𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝒾𝓇𝑜-ℳ𝒾𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓉𝓇𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒻𝒶𝓏𝑒𝓇 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝑔𝓇𝓊𝓅𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓉𝓇𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓁𝒽𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝑜 𝓇𝒶𝒸𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜. 𝒥𝒶́ 𝒜𝓃𝒹𝓇𝑒́ 𝒱𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓂𝑒 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝑒𝒸𝑒 𝓇𝒶𝒸𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶, 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝒿𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝓈𝒾𝓂𝓅𝓁𝑒𝓈 𝒻𝒶𝒸𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝒶𝓂𝒾𝑔𝑜𝓈 𝑒 𝒹𝒾𝓇𝒾𝑔𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒹𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶 𝓃𝑒𝑔𝓇𝒶 𝓃𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝒶 𝑒𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓅𝒶 (𝒶𝓁𝑔𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝓇𝒶𝒸𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒿𝒶𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒻𝒶𝓇𝒾𝒶). ℰ́ 𝒸𝑒𝓇𝓉𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓉𝑒𝓂 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝑒𝓈𝓅𝑒́𝒸𝒾𝑒 𝒹𝑒 “𝒻𝒾𝓍𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜” 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝒾𝑔𝒶𝓃𝒶 𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶𝒾́ 𝒶 𝓈𝑒𝓇 𝓇𝒶𝒸𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝓋𝒶𝒾 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝑒𝓃𝑜𝓇𝓂𝑒 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶. ℳ𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓋𝑒𝓏 𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜 𝑒́ 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓉𝑜𝓇𝒸𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝑜𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝑜́𝓇𝑔𝒶̃𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁.

𝒩𝒶𝓈 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑒𝓋𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈, 𝑜𝓈 𝒿𝑜𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝒻𝒶𝓏𝑒𝓂 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝑔𝓊𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝒸𝑜́𝓂𝑜𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝒶𝓅𝑜𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓂 𝒾𝓃𝒸𝑜𝓃𝑔𝓇𝓊𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝓃𝑜 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝒸𝓊𝓇𝓈𝑜 𝒶 𝒜𝓃𝒹𝓇𝑒́ 𝒱𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶 (𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜 𝒶 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝑒) 𝑒 𝒶 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜𝓈 𝓁𝒾́𝒹𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝒾𝓇𝑒𝒾𝓉𝒶. 𝒜𝓁𝒾𝒶́𝓈, 𝒽𝒶́ 𝟹 𝒹𝑒́𝒸𝒶𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓂 𝑒́: 𝒶𝑜𝓈 𝑔𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶 𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜 𝓈𝑒 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒹𝑜𝒶; 𝑜 𝑒𝓈𝒸𝓇𝓊𝓉𝒾́𝓃𝒾𝑜 𝒶𝑜𝓈 𝑔𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑜 𝒸𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑜-𝒹𝒾𝓇𝑒𝒾𝓉𝒶 𝑒́ 𝑒𝓃𝑜𝓇𝓂𝑒 𝒷𝑒𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝒶 𝒸𝓇𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒻𝒶́𝒸𝒾𝓁. 𝒩𝑜 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑜, 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝒸𝑒𝒹𝑒𝓂 𝒹𝑒 𝒾𝑔𝓊𝒶𝓁 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝓂𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝑜𝓈 𝓁𝒾́𝒹𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶. 𝒫𝑜𝓇𝓆𝓊𝑒̂?

𝒥𝑜𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒾𝒷𝓊𝑒𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝒸𝓊𝓈𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 “𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝓊𝓃𝓉𝑜𝓈” 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒻𝑜𝒾 𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒶̀ 𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝓅𝑒́𝓉𝓊𝒶, 𝑒𝓂 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝓂𝒶 𝑜𝓅𝑜𝓇𝓉𝓊𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝑜 𝒫𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝒾𝓇𝑜-ℳ𝒾𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓉𝓇𝑜 𝒶𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓋𝑒𝒾𝓉𝑜𝓊 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒻𝒶𝓏𝑒𝓇 𝓊𝓂 𝓋𝒾́𝒹𝑒𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓇𝒶𝓅𝒾𝒹𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒻𝑜𝒾 𝒸𝑜𝓁𝑜𝒸𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓇𝓇𝑒𝓇 𝓃𝑜𝓈 𝑜́𝓇𝑔𝒶̃𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁, 𝑜𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝓁𝒽𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝒶𝓈𝒾𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒, 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒾𝒷𝓊𝒾𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒹𝒶𝓇 𝓉𝑒𝓂𝓅𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒶 𝑒𝓍𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝒶𝑜 𝒫𝒮 𝓃𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒻𝒶𝓈𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑒́-𝒸𝒶𝓂𝓅𝒶𝓃𝒽𝒶 (𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓋𝒾𝒶 𝒶𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓇, 𝒻𝒶𝓋𝑜𝓇𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑜, 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓂, 𝑜 𝒫𝒮). ℳ𝒶𝓈, 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒 𝒶𝒾𝓃𝒹𝒶, 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝒫𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝒾𝓇𝑜-ℳ𝒾𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓉𝓇𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓇 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓋𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒹𝒶𝓇 𝟺 𝓅𝓈𝑒𝓊𝒹𝑜-𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑒𝓋𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝑒𝓂 𝓉𝒶𝓁𝓀 𝓈𝒽𝑜𝓌𝓈 𝒹𝒶 ℛ𝒯𝒫, 𝒮ℐ𝒞 𝑒 𝒯𝒱ℐ 𝓃𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒻𝒶𝓈𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑒́-𝒸𝒶𝓂𝓅𝒶𝓃𝒽𝒶 𝑒𝓁𝑒𝒾𝓉𝑜𝓇𝒶𝓁 𝒶 𝟹 𝓈𝑒𝓂𝒶𝓃𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝑒𝓁𝑒𝒾𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝓃𝒶𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓁𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓇𝑜 𝓊𝓂 𝑒𝓈𝒸𝒶𝓃𝒹𝒶𝓁𝑜𝓈𝑜 𝒻𝒶𝓋𝑜𝓇𝑒𝒸𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝒶𝑜 𝒸𝒶𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒹𝒶𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒫𝒮 𝑒 𝒶𝒸𝓉𝓊𝒶𝓁 𝒫𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝒾𝓇𝑜-ℳ𝒾𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓉𝓇𝑜 (𝒶𝓁𝑔𝑜 𝓋𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒𝒾𝓇𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒾𝓁𝓊𝓈𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓋𝑜 𝒹𝒶𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓁𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓈𝑒 𝓅𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒶 𝓃𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓁𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇 𝒹𝒾𝓉𝒶𝒹𝓊𝓇𝒶).

𝒪 ℬℰ 𝓉𝑒𝓂 𝒸𝒶𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒹𝒶𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓃𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓇𝑜𝓇𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 (𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝑒𝓍 ℱ𝒫𝟸𝟻 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓇𝑜𝓊𝒷𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝑒 𝓂𝒶𝓉𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝓅𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑜𝒶𝓈) 𝑒 𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶 ℛ𝓊𝒾 ℛ𝒾𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝓅𝑒́𝓉𝓊𝒶 (𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓈𝑒 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒸𝑒𝒷𝑒𝓊 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓃𝓈𝑜𝓇) 𝑒 𝒜𝓃𝒹𝓇𝑒́ 𝒱𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶 𝓅𝑜𝓇𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝓈𝑒𝓊 𝒹𝒾𝓇𝒾𝑔𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓈𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓉𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓁𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇, 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝒻𝒶𝓏𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝑜 𝓂𝑒𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝒶𝑔𝑜𝑔𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶.

ℋ𝒶́ 𝒾𝓃𝒸𝓁𝓊𝓈𝒾𝓋𝑒 𝒿𝑜𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝒶 𝒶𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝒾𝓇𝑒𝒸𝓉𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒶𝑜 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓋𝑜𝓉𝑜 𝓃𝑜 𝒞𝒽𝑒𝑔𝒶. 𝒱𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶 𝑒́ 𝒶𝒸𝓊𝓈𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝓊𝓂 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝒸𝓊𝓇𝓈𝑜 𝒻𝒶́𝒸𝒾𝓁 𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝒶𝑔𝑜𝑔𝑜; 𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝓁𝒾́𝒹𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓉𝑒̂𝓂? 𝒪 𝒫𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝒾𝓇𝑜-ℳ𝒾𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓉𝓇𝑜 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝒶𝑔𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝒻𝒶𝓁𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝓈𝑒𝓂𝒶𝓃𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓉𝓇𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓁𝒽𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝟺 𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓈? 𝒪𝓊 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝒶𝒻𝒾𝓇𝓂𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑜𝓊 𝒶 𝓅𝒶́𝑔𝒾𝓃𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝒶𝓊𝓈𝓉𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓂 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟻, 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓁𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝑒́ 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜𝓈 𝓃𝓊́𝓂𝑒𝓇𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑜 ℐ𝒩ℰ 𝑒 ℰ𝒰ℛ𝒪𝒮𝒯𝒜𝒯 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓃𝓈𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒹𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓊 𝑔𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝑜 𝑒𝓍𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒾𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝒶𝓈 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝒸𝒶𝓇𝑔𝒶𝓈 𝒻𝒾𝓈𝒸𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝓈𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓇𝑒 𝑒 𝑜 𝓂𝑒𝓃𝑜𝓇 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝓅𝓊́𝒷𝓁𝒾𝒸𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓈𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓇𝑒, 𝒾𝓃𝒸𝓁𝓊𝓈𝒾𝓋𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓁𝑒 𝑒𝒻𝑒𝒸𝓉𝓊𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓂𝓅𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒯𝓇𝑜𝒾𝓀𝒶? ℰ𝓊 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝒶𝓇 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝑒𝓍𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓁𝑜𝓈 𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝑜 𝑒𝓈𝓅𝒶𝒸̧𝑜 𝑒́ 𝒸𝓊𝓇𝓉𝑜.

𝒫𝑜𝓇 𝒻𝒾𝓂, 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓂𝑜𝓈 𝑒𝓂 𝓂𝑒̂𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓁𝑒𝒾𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝓁𝑒𝑔𝒾𝓈𝓁𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓋𝒶𝓈, 𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒽𝑜 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝒶𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝒷𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜𝓈. ℰ́ 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝓅𝓁𝑒𝓍𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓋𝑒𝒿𝑜 𝒶 𝓃𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝑒𝓈𝓂𝒶𝑔𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇𝒶 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝑜𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝒿𝑜𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈, 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾𝓉𝑜́𝓁𝑜𝑔𝑜𝓈 𝑒 𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜́𝓁𝑜𝑔𝑜𝓈 (𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓂 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝒶𝒷𝑒 𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑜𝒶𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓂 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶, 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓅𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑜 𝑒 𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜 𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒸𝒶𝓁𝒽𝒶) 𝒹𝒾𝓏𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓂 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒱𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒹𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝒷𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝒶𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒹𝒶𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝑒́ 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑔𝒶𝓃𝒽𝒶𝓂 (𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜 𝓈𝑒 𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶). 𝒜 𝓊𝓂 𝒿𝑜𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝑜𝓊 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇 𝒶𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓁𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓈𝑒 𝓅𝑒𝒹𝑒 𝑒́ 𝒾𝓈𝑒𝓃𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜, 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝒻𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝑒 𝓈𝑒𝓇𝒾𝑒𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒. ℰ 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝒾𝓈𝓈𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓋𝑒𝒿𝑜, 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝑜, 𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓋𝑒𝒿𝑜 𝑒́ 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝑒𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓂 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓅𝒾𝓇 𝒶 𝒸𝒶𝓂𝒾𝓈𝑜𝓁𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓇𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝑒, 𝒾𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝒶𝓁𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓈𝑒 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓈𝓉𝑒, 𝒱𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒹𝑒 𝓈𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓇𝑒.

𝒮𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝒷𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓈𝓈𝑒𝓂 𝓊𝓂 𝒿𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒻𝓊𝓉𝑒𝒷𝑜𝓁 𝒶𝓉𝑒́ 𝓈𝑒 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝒾𝓏𝑒𝓇 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝑒𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓅𝒶 𝒿𝑜𝑔𝑜𝓊 𝓂𝑒𝓁𝒽𝑜𝓇 𝑒 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒹𝑒𝓊, 𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝒸𝒶𝓈𝑜. 𝒩𝒶 𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒽𝒶 𝑜𝓅𝒾𝓃𝒾𝒶̃𝑜, 𝒱𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶 𝑔𝒶𝓃𝒽𝑜𝓊 𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝒷𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝓉𝑜𝒹𝑜𝓈 (𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝑒𝓍𝒸𝑒𝓅𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝒷𝒶𝓉𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂 ℛ𝓊𝒾 𝒯𝒶𝓋𝒶𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒹𝒾𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝓊 𝓊𝓂 𝑒𝓂𝓅𝒶𝓉𝑒) 𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝒾𝓍𝑜𝓊 𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓈𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝓃𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑜𝓈𝑜𝓈, 𝒶𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓅𝒶𝓁𝒽𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝑒 𝓈𝑒𝓂 𝒶𝓇𝑔𝓊𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓊𝓈 𝑜𝓅𝑜𝓈𝒾𝓉𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈 (𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜 𝒶 𝓁𝒾́𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝒹𝑜 ℬℰ). 𝒪𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝒷𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓂𝓊𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝑒𝓂 𝒾𝒹𝑒𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓅𝑜𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈 𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝒶𝓈𝒾𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒸𝓊𝓇𝓉𝑜𝓈.

𝒫𝑜𝓇 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜 𝓁𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝑒 𝑒𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓅𝑜𝓈𝒾𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜, 𝒽𝒶́ 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 𝒻𝓊𝓉𝑒𝒷𝑜𝓁 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑜𝒸𝓊𝓅𝒶𝓂 𝒽𝑜𝓇𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒾𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓅𝒶𝒸̧𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓁𝑒𝓋𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓋𝑜 𝑜𝓊, 𝓅𝒾𝑜𝓇, 𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝒷𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓈, 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒹𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝓂𝓊𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝑜́𝓅𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝒷𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓈, 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝓈𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓈𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑒𝓂 𝓅𝑜𝓊𝓅𝒶𝓇 𝒶 𝓂𝒶́ 𝑔𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑜 𝑒𝓈𝒸𝓇𝓊𝓉𝒾́𝓃𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶 𝑒 𝓉𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝑜𝓇𝒾𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝑜𝓈 𝑒𝓁𝑒𝒾𝓉𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝒶 𝓋𝑜𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝓃𝒶 𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶. 𝒜𝓉𝑒́ 𝑜𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓋𝒶𝓁𝑜𝓈, 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝒶𝓈𝒾𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒶𝓃𝓊́𝓃𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓈, 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓈𝑒 𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓂𝓅𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝒷𝒶𝓉𝑒, 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶́ 𝑒𝓂 𝒸𝒶𝓊𝓈𝒶 𝑜 𝒶𝒸𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝑜𝓇 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑜𝓇𝓉𝒶̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝓊𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈 – 𝒶 𝑒𝓁𝑒𝒾𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓊𝓈 𝓇𝑒𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝒫𝒶𝓇𝓁𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝑜 𝒢𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝑜.

 

Mas também nestes debates, os jornalistas têm culpa, porque fazem perguntas directas aos líderes dos partidos e estes fogem às questões discutindo muitas vezes assuntos sem relevância. Devia haver regras para isto, como por exemplo uma penalização do tempo para o líder que não respondesse a uma pergunta directa.

ℳ𝓊𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒽𝒶́ 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒹𝒾𝓏𝑒𝓇 𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝑜 𝑒𝓈𝓅𝒶𝒸̧𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓉𝑒 𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝑔𝑜 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝒾𝓃𝒻𝒾𝓃𝒾𝓉𝑜. ℱ𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒶𝓆𝓊𝒾 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝒻𝓁𝑒𝓍𝒶̃𝑜: 𝓂𝓊𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒿𝑜𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝓈𝑒 𝒶𝓊𝓉𝑜-𝒶𝓋𝒶𝓁𝒾𝒶𝓈𝓈𝑒𝓂 𝑒 𝒻𝒾𝓏𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑒𝓂 𝓊𝓂 𝑒𝓈𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝓈𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓂 𝓋𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒𝒾𝓇𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝒻𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝑒 𝒾𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜𝓈, 𝒶 𝒷𝑒𝓂 𝒹𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝓂𝑜𝒸𝓇𝒶𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝑒, 𝒿𝒶́ 𝒶𝑔𝑜𝓇𝒶, 𝒹𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝒸𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝑒 𝒹𝑜 𝒸𝒾𝓋𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜. 𝒰𝓂 𝓅𝑜𝓊𝒸𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝑒́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝓉𝒶𝓂𝒷𝑒́𝓂 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓁𝒽𝑒𝓈 𝒻𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝓂𝒶𝓁. 𝒞𝑜𝓃𝓋𝑒́𝓂 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓇 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶 𝒟𝑒𝓂𝑜𝒸𝓇𝒶𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶, 𝒶𝒸𝒾𝓂𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓉𝓊𝒹𝑜, 𝓁𝒾𝒷𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝑒 𝒾𝑔𝓊𝒶𝓁𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒.

* Politólogo

IN "SOL" - 11/01/21

* Ora, estimados visitadores temos aqui um lider da "Cooperativa de Empreendedorismo para o Desenvolvimento Económico e Social de Todo o País, CRL", auto titulado polítólogo, tendencioso diremos nós, que nas entrelinhas percebemos ser acólito do chefe do "arreda" o nome mais adequado para a organização do sr. ventura.

À direcção do SOL agradecemos a edição desta pústula opinativa..