MARIANA RIQUITO

.

 Os mitos da transição verde

A narrativa hegemónica em torno das alterações climáticas chegou, assim, a um ponto de contradição impossível de ignorar: através de estratégias de manipulação discursiva e de coação material, vai fomentando a ilusão de que não há alternativa à mineração dita verde e às energias ditas limpas. Ou descarbonizamos, ou destruímos a natureza.

𝐸𝑚 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟿, 𝑎 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙 — 𝑜 𝑃𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝐸𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑢, 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑒 “𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑛𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑠”, 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒 “𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎”. 𝑈𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑑𝑒, 𝑜𝑠 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑎̃𝑜 𝐸𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑎 (𝑈𝐸) 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑚-𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑟 𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝟻𝟻% 𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑢𝑓𝑎 (𝐺𝐸𝐸) 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝟸𝟶𝟹𝟶, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑏𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝟸𝟶𝟻𝟶, 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑒́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑏𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒. 𝑀𝑎𝑠, 𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 “𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒” 𝑒 “𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎”, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟.

𝑂 𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑓𝑜́𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑖𝑠, 𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑈𝐸, 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑔𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑟𝑎-𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑐𝑛𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑠, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠-𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜 𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑜 𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑠-𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑠. 𝐿𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 “𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑙”, 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 “𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜” 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑢𝑎 𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣(𝑖𝑠𝑡)𝑎𝑠. 𝐸𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑏𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚-𝑠𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠, 𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑐𝑒́𝑢 𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎́𝑔𝑢𝑎, 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑎, 𝑑𝑖𝑧𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑠, 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜𝑠. 𝐸́ 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜, 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐵𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑜, 𝑑𝑎 𝐴𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑙𝑎, 𝑑’𝐴𝑟𝑔𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 (𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖, 𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎) 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 “𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠” 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝐴 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑎 𝑝𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚, 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑎́𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑠. 𝐴𝑙𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝐶𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝐵𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝐺𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑗𝑒 𝑁𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑗𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑠 “𝑧𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑓𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒”: 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑒𝑠𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 “𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜”.

𝑂 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑗𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜. 𝑀𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 “𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒” — 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑠 — 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑏𝑖𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒? 𝐴 𝑢́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑣𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑟, 𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠.

𝐴𝑙𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜, 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑒́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑟𝑎́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠-𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜, 𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑎́𝑠, 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑈𝐸 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒̂. 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑒́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒́𝑚, 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑟, 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑒́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜?

𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑓𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐺𝐸𝐸, 𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑚: 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎, 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠, 𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑣𝑎𝑧𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠. 𝐴𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠, 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠. 𝐹𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑜, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎 𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑖́𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑜 𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 — 𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑎𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑜́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑜 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎.

𝐴 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑒𝑚𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑢, 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑟: 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒́𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑓𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑖𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 ℎ𝑎́ 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑠. 𝑂𝑢 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑏𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖́𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑧𝑎. 𝐴 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙ℎ𝑎 𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑚. 𝐸́ 𝑢𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎: 𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑧𝑎, 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑒, 𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑐𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑎. 𝐼𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑜, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒́𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠, 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜𝑠, 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠, 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑜, 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑚 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙; 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑟𝑎-𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑚 𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑠; 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎, 𝑎𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑒́𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎, 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒 𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑎.

* Investigadora Júnior no Centro de Estudos Sociais da Universidade de Coimbra (CES-UC). Ecofeminista anticapitalista. Acredita que outros mundos, mais justos, são possíveis.

IN "PÚBLICO" - 03/12/21 

 .