FERNANDA CÂNCIO

 .

O terrorismo de plantar 

erva no quintal

Portugal surge, num novo ranking sobre eficácia sanitária e humanismo na política da droga, num honroso 3º lugar. Mas só porque a maioria dos outros países está muito pior; temos ainda uma lei da droga que equivale vender erva, cocaína ou ecstasy aos piores crimes do Código Penal.

𝑂𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 (...) 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜."

𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑧 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑎̂𝑚𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑎 "𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑎", 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝟷𝟿𝟿𝟹 - 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑑𝑒́𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠. 𝐸́ 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜 (𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜/𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜, 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 "𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑠") 𝑒́, 𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑚𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝐶𝑜́𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑃𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑠𝑒, 𝑛𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 "𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠", 𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 - 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑜 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝐼́𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝐺𝑙𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑎 𝑃𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝐷𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎-𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑧, 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 "𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑚𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎": 𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒, 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑓𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜. 

𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜, 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑔𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑜, 𝑑𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑣𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑏𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑎, 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑎: 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖, 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑝𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜 (𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑟, 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎-𝑠𝑒, 𝑒́ 𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜) 𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠. 

 𝑄𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑚𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑢 𝑎̀𝑠 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠. 𝐴𝑙𝑖𝑎́𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑚𝑒́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑖́𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑚𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑢𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑎 𝑣𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑟. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑙𝘩𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑢𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑐𝘩𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑖 𝘩𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑏𝑖𝑠: 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑧. 

 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑑𝑖𝑧 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑏𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑡𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒́𝑛𝑠, 𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 (𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑧𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠), 𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 (𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑜𝑙𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑜), 𝑐𝑢𝑗𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠. 𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠: 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟? 

 𝑆𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 "𝑎𝑏𝑢𝑠𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎", 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝘩𝑎́ 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜: 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 "𝑎𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑜"; 𝑠𝑒 𝘩𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜́𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑐𝑜𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑝𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑜𝑏𝑗𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑧 - 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑏𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝟷𝟸 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜. 

 𝐸 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑠𝑒, 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑙𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟 "𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜" - 𝑒 𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠, 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 "𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖́𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑢́𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠" 𝑜𝑢 "𝑜 𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑏𝑡𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑜𝑏𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑣𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎", 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎, 𝑎̀ 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑚𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑒 𝑚𝑎́𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑜 (𝑜𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎, 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝟷𝟻). 

𝐸́ 𝑐𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝟷𝟻/𝟿𝟹 (𝑎 "𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑎") 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 "𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑟 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒" - 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 "𝑎 𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑖́𝑑𝑎, 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠", 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑜. 

𝑀𝑎𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑒-𝑠𝑒: 𝑢𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑚𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑣𝑎𝑠𝑜. 𝐼𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑒𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑠𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑙, 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑎́ 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑒 "𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑟", 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑜. 𝐵𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑒́𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑢 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑒 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑏𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎. 𝐴𝑙𝑖𝑎́𝑠, 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑐̧𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑢 𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑒́, 𝑎̀ 𝑙𝑢𝑧 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖, 𝑢𝑚 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑢𝑟𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑜. 

𝑆𝑎𝑏𝑒-𝑠𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑗𝑎𝑧 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠: 𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 (𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑢 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜) 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 "𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑠" 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒. 𝑂 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑜, 𝑛𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝘩𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜: 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑎 𝘩𝑖𝑝𝑜́𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑒. 

𝑆𝑢𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑡𝑖𝑝𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 "𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑜𝑠𝑎" 𝑜𝑢 "𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜" (𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 "𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐𝑒̂𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑎́𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑚𝑒́𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑜 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑖́𝑠𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚") 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑏𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑎𝑠, 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑎 𝑜𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠. 𝐴𝑙𝑖𝑎́𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑜 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒, 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑔𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎 "𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜", 𝑑𝑒, "𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒", 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑟 "𝑎̀ 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑎𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑎̀ 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑎̀ 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑎̀ 𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑎𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑎𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒, 𝑎̀ 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑎̀ 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑢 𝑎̀ 𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑎̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑜𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠𝑎𝑠" 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑠: 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑐𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠.

 

𝐴𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑖́ 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑢𝑟𝑎̂𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑜𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑒, 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑟, 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖𝑟, 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑢 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑙𝘩𝑎𝑟, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑑𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑟, "𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑠". 𝑄𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑚 𝟹𝟶 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑎 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑟, 𝑛𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑓𝑎𝑧-𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑙𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎-𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑖́𝑑𝑜 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑖́𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑜 𝘩𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑠.

* Jornalista

IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS" - 09/11/21

.