PEDRO MARQUES LOPES

 .

A liberdade e as oportunidades 

para o candidato a Lisboa da IL

Não tenho dúvidas de que o Bruno Horta Soares prefere a democracia à ditadura, como estou certo de que se soubesse do que fala não diria os disparates que disse. Será apenas ignorância.

“𝙻𝚒𝚜𝚋𝚘𝚊, 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚘𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚜. 𝙷𝚊́ 𝟽𝟶 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚜, 𝚍𝚘𝚒𝚜 𝚓𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚒𝚡𝚊𝚟𝚊𝚖 𝚊 𝙱𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚊 𝙰𝚕𝚝𝚊 𝚛𝚞𝚖𝚘 𝚊 𝙻𝚒𝚜𝚋𝚘𝚊 𝚊̀ 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚑𝚘𝚛. 𝙰𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚌̧𝚊𝚟𝚊 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚑𝚘 𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘, 𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚛 𝚎 𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘, 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚌̧𝚊 𝚎 𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚛 𝚚𝚞𝚎, 𝚝𝚊𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚑𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜, 𝚗𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚊, 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚗𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚊, 𝚊𝚌𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚖 𝚖𝚊𝚕. 𝙷𝚘𝚓𝚎 𝚟𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚕𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚟𝚎𝚣 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚟𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚏𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚊𝚒𝚜. #𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚊́𝙽𝚊𝙷𝚘𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚌̧𝚊 𝚊 𝙻𝚒𝚜𝚋𝚘𝚊!”

𝙾 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚘 𝚊̀ 𝙲𝚊𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝙻𝚒𝚜𝚋𝚘𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚞 𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚗𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚊 𝚙𝚊́𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔. 𝙵𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚖 𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚛 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚘 𝙱𝚛𝚞𝚗𝚘 𝙷𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊 𝚂𝚘𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚘́ 𝚊𝚌𝚑𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝙻𝚒𝚜𝚋𝚘𝚊, 𝚑𝚊́ 𝟽𝟶 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚜, 𝚍𝚊𝚟𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚘𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚖 𝚕𝚊́ 𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚟𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚜𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚎, 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚕𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎. 𝙴 𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚐𝚊 𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚎 “𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚟𝚎𝚣 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚟𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚏𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚊𝚒𝚜”.

𝙳𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚖 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚙𝚎́𝚒𝚜, 𝚎́ 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚊́𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚓𝚊 𝚞𝚖 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊𝚘 𝙿𝙰𝙽 𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚘𝚜 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚘𝚞 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚘́ 𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚖 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚎́𝚍𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚎 𝚋𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚘𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜.

𝙲𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚘 𝙱𝚛𝚞𝚗𝚘 𝙷𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊 𝚂𝚘𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚊𝚋𝚎, 𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚟𝚎𝚣 𝚜𝚎𝚓𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚑𝚘𝚛 𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚛-𝚕𝚑𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚖 𝙻𝚒𝚜𝚋𝚘𝚊 𝚎 𝚗𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚒́𝚜, 𝚗𝚊 𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚊, 𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎𝚣𝚊 𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚊, 𝚊 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚏𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚕 𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚟𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚍𝚊 𝙴𝚞𝚛𝚘𝚙𝚊, 𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚊𝚡𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚕𝚏𝚊𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚘 𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚊́𝚟𝚎𝚒𝚜, 𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚣𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚒́𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝙻𝚒𝚜𝚋𝚘𝚊 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚊 𝚞𝚖 𝚖𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚊, 𝚘 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚑𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚏𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚕 𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚞𝚖 𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚘, 𝚘 𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚊̀ 𝚄𝚗𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚖 𝚎𝚡𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚘𝚜 𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚜 𝚎 𝚗𝚎𝚖 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚎 𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚘 𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚊̀ 𝚜𝚊𝚞́𝚍𝚎. 𝙳𝚒𝚐𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚓𝚊 𝚞𝚖 𝚞́𝚗𝚒𝚌𝚘 𝚒́𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊𝚜 𝚘𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚜𝚎𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚛 𝚟𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚐𝚘𝚛𝚊.

𝙿𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚜, 𝚘 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚘 𝚊 𝙻𝚒𝚜𝚋𝚘𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊 𝙸𝙻 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚜 𝙿𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚐𝚊𝚕 𝚟𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚊 𝚜𝚘𝚋 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚞𝚛𝚊. 𝙾𝚞 𝚜𝚎𝚓𝚊, 𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚛 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚛 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒́𝚟𝚎𝚕, 𝚊 𝚕𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚟𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚘 𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚊. 𝙴 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚜𝚘́ 𝚊 𝚕𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚘𝚙𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚊̃𝚘, 𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚜𝚖𝚘 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚜 𝚕𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚜, 𝚊𝚝𝚎́ 𝚊𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚕𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝙸𝙻 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚎 𝚊𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚛 𝚜𝚞𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚛 𝚊̀𝚜 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜, 𝚊 𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚘́𝚖𝚒𝚌𝚊.

𝙽𝚊̃𝚘 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚑𝚘 𝚍𝚞́𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘 𝙱𝚛𝚞𝚗𝚘 𝙷𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊 𝚂𝚘𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎 𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚌𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚊̀ 𝚍𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚞𝚛𝚊, 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚞 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚞𝚋𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚊 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚎. 𝚂𝚎𝚛𝚊́ 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚒𝚐𝚗𝚘𝚛𝚊̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊.

𝙰 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎́ 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚊 𝚒𝚐𝚗𝚘𝚛𝚊̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚎́ 𝚏𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊𝚝𝚎́ 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚊 𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚘 𝚟𝚊́𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊. 𝙴 𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚎-𝚜𝚎, 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚊𝚋𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚞𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚕𝚎𝚐𝚒́𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚘 𝚏𝚊𝚣𝚎̂-𝚕𝚘 – 𝚊𝚝𝚎́ 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊 𝚊̀ 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚊𝚕 𝚌𝚊̂𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝙿𝚊𝚒́𝚜 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎́ 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚏𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚎 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚛 𝚞𝚖 -, 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚊𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚛 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎́𝚌𝚒𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚟𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚘 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚘 𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚛 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚘 𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚐𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚒𝚖𝚎. 𝚁𝚎𝚙𝚒𝚝𝚘, 𝚊𝚌𝚑𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎́ 𝚜𝚘́ 𝚒𝚐𝚗𝚘𝚛𝚊̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊.

𝙿𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚎𝚒𝚊-𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎́ 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚘 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚒́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊𝚜 𝚖𝚊́𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊́𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚘́ 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚖 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚞𝚌𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚊. 𝙴́ 𝚎𝚖 𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎. 𝙲𝚘𝚗𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚑𝚊 𝚎́ 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖 𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊𝚘 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚞𝚋𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎 𝚘 𝚖𝚒́𝚗𝚒𝚖𝚘 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚒́𝚗𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚊 𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘́𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚞 𝚙𝚊𝚒́𝚜.

* Jurista, articulista

IN "VISÃO" - 06/09/21 

 .