JOY HOWARD

.

O boicote à publicidade 

não prejudicou o Facebook. 

Mas passou uma mensagem

𝚀𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊́𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚊 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚖𝚊̃𝚘 𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚎𝚖 𝚓𝚞𝚕𝚑𝚘, 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚒́𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚛 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚎 𝚓𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚖 𝚊 𝚗𝚘́𝚜 𝚗𝚘 𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 #𝚂𝚝𝚘𝚙𝙷𝚊𝚝𝚎𝙵𝚘𝚛𝙿𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚒𝚝. 𝙽𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚒́𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚛 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚖 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚘 𝙲𝙴𝙾 𝚍𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔, 𝙼𝚊𝚛𝚔 𝚉𝚞𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚐, 𝚎 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚊̃𝚜 𝚍𝚊𝚜 "𝚋𝚒𝚐 𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚑" 𝚊 𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚛 𝚗𝚘 𝙲𝚊𝚙𝚒𝚝𝚘́𝚕𝚒𝚘, 𝚗𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚊 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚊 𝚍𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚌𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚊, 𝚏𝚊𝚌𝚎 𝚊𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚍𝚎 𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚘 "𝙽𝚎𝚠 𝙳𝚎𝚊𝚕".

𝙿𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚒́𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜, 𝚗𝚘 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘, 𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚏𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚕𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚘𝚜 𝚕𝚞𝚌𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚡𝚌𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔, 𝚙𝚘𝚞𝚌𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚙𝚘́𝚜 𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚎 𝚘 𝚏𝚒𝚖 𝚍𝚘 𝚋𝚘𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚝𝚎. 𝙽𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚊𝚛 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚊 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚖𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚌̧𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚕𝚞𝚌𝚛𝚘𝚜, 𝚏𝚊𝚌𝚎 𝚊̀ 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚐𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚎 𝚊̀ 𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚐𝚗𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚒𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜.

𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚖𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘 𝚋𝚘𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚝𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚑𝚊 𝚊𝚏𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚎𝚐𝚘́𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔, 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚖 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎. 𝙹𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚊́𝚖𝚘-𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚘 𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 #𝚂𝚝𝚘𝚙𝙷𝚊𝚝𝚎𝙵𝚘𝚛𝙿𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚒𝚝 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚖𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚞𝚖 𝚕𝚞𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚊 𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚘́𝚍𝚒𝚘. 𝙾 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝚉𝚞𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚐 𝚍𝚎𝚞 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚎𝚖 𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚊́𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝙳𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚍 𝚃𝚛𝚞𝚖𝚙, 𝚖𝚎𝚜𝚖𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎̂𝚖 𝚒𝚗𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚜. 𝙽𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚊̃𝚘, 𝚉𝚞𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚐 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚞𝚖 "𝚊́𝚛𝚋𝚒𝚝𝚛𝚘 𝚍𝚊 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎". 𝚄𝚖𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚒𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚝𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚏𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚊 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎́ 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚎 𝚎 𝚌𝚒́𝚗𝚒𝚌𝚊 - 𝚎́ 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚘𝚜𝚊.

𝙲𝚘𝚖 𝚊𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜, 𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚌𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚊 𝚗𝚞𝚖 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚖 𝚜𝚊𝚒́𝚍𝚊. 𝙿𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔: 𝚊𝚗𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚛 𝚗𝚊 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚞𝚊 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚜𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚘 𝚙𝚞́𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚘. 𝙼𝚊𝚜, 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚘 𝚏𝚊𝚣𝚎𝚛, 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚞𝚖 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚞𝚙𝚕𝚘 𝚊𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 - 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚘 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚊 𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚜 𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚎, 𝚎𝚖 𝚜𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘, 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚌̧𝚊𝚛.

𝙸𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚘́𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚐𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚊̃𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚟𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚖 𝚏𝚞𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚏𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚜. 𝚄𝚖 𝚙𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚘 𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚊 𝙳𝚊𝚜𝚑𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚊𝚗𝚞́𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚘 𝚗𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚗𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚝𝚘. 𝙼𝚊𝚜 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚜𝚒𝚐𝚗𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚞 𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚊𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚎, 𝚗𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘, 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚞́𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚘́𝚍𝚒𝚘 - 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚗𝚎𝚗𝚑𝚞𝚖 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚜 𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜. 𝚂𝚘́ 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚍𝚎𝚒𝚡𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘-𝚘, 𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚊 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚘𝚜 𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜. 𝙴́ 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚖.

𝙳𝚎𝚜𝚍𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚃𝚛𝚞𝚖𝚙 𝚏𝚘𝚒 𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚘, 𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚜 𝚊̀ 𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚖 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚖 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘, 𝚎 𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚝𝚎̂𝚖-𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚖. 𝙽𝚘𝚜 𝚞́𝚕𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚘𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚜, 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚌𝚊𝚛 𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊̃𝚘 𝚊 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚑𝚊𝚛 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚛 𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔, 𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚊 𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚗𝚊 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊 𝚎𝚖 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍-𝚋𝚢. 𝙾 𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 #𝚂𝚝𝚘𝚙𝙷𝚊𝚝𝚎𝙵𝚘𝚛𝙿𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚒𝚝 𝚙𝚘𝚙𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚣𝚘𝚞, 𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚘𝚞 𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚞 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚊 𝚊̀ 𝚕𝚞𝚝𝚊 𝚗𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚛 𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔.

𝚃𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚒́𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚊𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚖 𝚍𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚜𝚖𝚊 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊. 𝙳𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚜 - 𝚍𝚊 𝙿𝚏𝚒𝚣𝚎𝚛 𝚊̀ 𝙿𝚊𝚝𝚛𝚎𝚘𝚗 𝚎 𝚊̀ 𝙷𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚎𝚢-𝙳𝚊𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚜𝚘𝚗 - 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚓𝚊𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚊𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚌̧𝚊 𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚗𝚘́𝚜. 𝙴, 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚊𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔, 𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚞́𝚍𝚘, 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚘 𝙿𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝, 𝚘 𝚁𝚎𝚍𝚍𝚒𝚝 𝚎 𝚘 𝚀𝚞𝚘𝚛𝚊, 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚊̃𝚘 𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚊̀𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚊 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚝𝚒́𝚗𝚑𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎.

𝙾 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚘́𝚍𝚒𝚘 𝚘𝚗𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚝𝚊 𝚊𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔, 𝚘𝚋𝚟𝚒𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎, 𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚏𝚕𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚞𝚜 𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊̃𝚘. 𝙾 𝚁𝚎𝚍𝚍𝚒𝚝, 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚟𝚎 𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚕𝚞𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚏𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚘́𝚍𝚒𝚘, 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊́ 𝚎𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚎. 𝙽𝚘 𝚒𝚗𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚊̃𝚘, 𝚊 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚞 𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚒𝚟𝚘 𝚗𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚛 𝚐𝚛𝚞𝚙𝚘𝚜 𝚎 𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 "𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚖 𝚊 𝚟𝚒𝚘𝚕𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚘𝚞 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚖 𝚘 𝚘́𝚍𝚒𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚗𝚊 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚎 𝚟𝚞𝚕𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎". 𝙰 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚎𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚘𝚞 𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚐𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚊𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚞́𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚘́𝚍𝚒𝚘. 𝙴𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚎́ 𝚘 𝚝𝚒𝚙𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊 𝚎𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊́𝚟𝚎𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚏𝚊𝚣𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎.

𝚄𝚖 𝚋𝚘𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚝𝚎 𝚊𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚘 𝚝𝚒𝚙𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚘 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊́𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚊𝚜 "𝚋𝚒𝚐 𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚑" 𝚗𝚊 𝙸𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚎𝚝. 𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚖𝚘 𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚖 𝚊 𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚘 𝚋𝚎𝚖, 𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚎𝚖 𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚞𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚍𝚛𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚒𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚞𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜. 𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚖𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚖𝚒𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚖 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚘 𝙸𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚓𝚊𝚖 𝚏𝚛𝚎𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚋𝚎𝚖-𝚜𝚞𝚌𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚟𝚞𝚕𝚐𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚊𝚜 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚜 𝚎 𝚗𝚊 𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚜, 𝚘 𝙸𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚞𝚊 𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊́ 𝚜𝚞𝚓𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚘 𝚊̀𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚊𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚞𝚌𝚘 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚘𝚛𝚘𝚜𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎 𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚘́𝚍𝚒𝚘. 𝙴́ 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚕 𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚜 𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚖 𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚊𝚛 𝚞𝚖 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎, 𝚜𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚜𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚘 𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚘𝚙𝚘́𝚕𝚒𝚘 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚍𝚎𝚜 𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚒𝚜.

𝙾 𝚙𝚘𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚎́ 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚡𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚗𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚒𝚊 - 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝙳𝚒𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝙼𝚊𝚛𝚔𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐, 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚎𝚞 - 𝚝𝚎̂𝚖 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚛. 𝙰𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚖𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 #𝚂𝚝𝚘𝚙𝙷𝚊𝚝𝚎𝙵𝚘𝚛𝙿𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚒𝚝, 𝚝𝚒́𝚗𝚑𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚓𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔, 𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚓𝚞𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚛 𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚘𝚞 𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚊𝚕𝚐𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚊𝚕𝚎́𝚖 𝚍𝚘 𝚕𝚞𝚌𝚛𝚘. 𝙰𝚝𝚎́ 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚒𝚘 𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚛 𝚘𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚜 𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚐𝚘𝚜 𝚎 𝚎𝚡-𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚑𝚊𝚛 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚕𝚊́. 𝙼𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎 𝚎́ 𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚎́𝚖 𝚞𝚖 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚎 𝚓𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚒 𝚊 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚞𝚙 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚊, 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚊 𝚊𝚖𝚋𝚒𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚑𝚊𝚛 𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖 𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚊 𝚘𝚗𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔 𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊 𝙶𝚘𝚘𝚐𝚕𝚎. 𝙽𝚊̃𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚛𝚘 𝚝𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚖𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚘𝚌𝚞𝚙𝚊𝚛 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚎𝚖 𝚛𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚊̀ 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚘 𝚖𝚎𝚞 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚛 𝚍𝚞𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚊 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚑𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝚖𝚎𝚞 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚊𝚖 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚊𝚒𝚜.

𝙼𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚞 𝚜𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊, 𝚎 𝚘 𝚋𝚘𝚒𝚌𝚘𝚝𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚒 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊. 𝚁𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚛 𝚊𝚜 "𝚋𝚒𝚐 𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚑" 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚊́ 𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚘 𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚕 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚡𝚒𝚐𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚒𝚘 𝚜𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚊 𝚗𝚒́𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚕. 𝙾 𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚘 𝙼𝚊𝚛𝚔 𝚉𝚞𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚐 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚎 𝚊𝚘𝚜 𝚏𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊́𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝙵𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚘𝚔, 𝚗𝚘 𝚖𝚎̂𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚍𝚘, 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚌̧𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚞𝚊𝚖. 𝙴𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎, 𝚎𝚖 𝚗𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚛𝚘, 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚘 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚜 𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚊𝚜 "𝚋𝚒𝚐 𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚑", 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚘𝚜 𝚗𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚎-𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚊 𝚟𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚖 𝚗𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚛, 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚞𝚖 𝚟𝚒𝚋𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚛 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚟𝚎𝚣.

* 𝙳𝚒𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝙼𝚊𝚛𝚔𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚊 𝙳𝚊𝚜𝚑𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎

IN "DIÁRIO DE NOTÍCIAS"
03/09720
.