.
Inclusão, só com disrupção
Não é fácil construir uma esquerda atenta às diferentes questões
levantadas pela diversidade de género. Mais difícil ainda é trazer este
princípio para a sociedade. É necessária uma reflexão profunda sobre as
nossas dificuldades enquanto esquerda inserida no contexto português.
𝐴 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝐿𝐺𝐵𝑇𝑄𝐼𝐴+ 𝑒́ 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑢́𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑛𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑜 𝐵𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑒. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑙𝑒́𝑠𝑏𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠, 𝑔𝑎𝑦𝑠, 𝑏𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠.
𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑥𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜 𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑢 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ 𝐴𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝟽𝟺. 𝐴 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑥𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝐿𝐺𝐵𝑇𝑄𝐼𝐴+ 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑀𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝐻𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑒 𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝐿𝐺𝐵𝑇 𝑝𝑢𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 (𝑎𝑡𝑒́ ℎ𝑜𝑗𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜̃𝑒𝑠). 𝑁𝑜 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝐽𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑁𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑓𝑖𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 «𝐴 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑒 ℎ𝑜𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠», 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑢𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝟻𝟶 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚 𝑛𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜.
𝐻𝑜𝑗𝑒, 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 “𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠” 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝐿𝐺𝐵𝑇𝑄𝐼𝐴+ 𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑢𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑟𝑎𝑙. 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑚 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠, 𝑡𝑒̂𝑚 𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑠𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠, 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑖𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑠, 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑢𝑐𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑑𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎, 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑎 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑢𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑢 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑒́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠.
𝑂𝑙ℎ𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑒𝑥𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜, 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝐸𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑎. 𝑆𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝐸𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒́𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑎 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑏𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑎̀ 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 ℎ𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑒́ 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑢𝑚 ℎ𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟 𝑛𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑐𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠. 𝐴𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑎𝑡𝑒́ ℎ𝑜𝑗𝑒, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠, 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑏𝑦, 𝑛𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑖𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎, 𝑎 𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑎̃𝑜. 𝑃𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜, 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑢𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛ℎ𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠, 𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑜-𝑠𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑝𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒.
𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜́𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑖́𝑟𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑖́𝑠𝑒𝑠, 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎. 𝐽𝑎́ ℎ𝑎́ 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑜 𝑃𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟, 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑜, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑎𝑜 𝑚𝑎́𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑎 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑣𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜. 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎, 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑖𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜. 𝐴𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑜 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑎𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑙𝑢/𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑢 (𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑜 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙).
𝐴 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑖𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎?
𝐺𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑎. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑜́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎, 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑟. 𝐷𝑒𝑖𝑥𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑐̧𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖, 𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑟𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜? 𝑂𝑢 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑎 𝑣𝑜𝑧 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑚𝑖́𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜?
𝑃𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑧𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎, 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑓𝑎𝑧𝑒̂-𝑙𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑒𝑛𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜? 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑎 𝑢́𝑙𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒́𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑒́𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎. 𝐻𝑜𝑗𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎́ 𝑛𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜.
𝑂 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝐿𝐺𝐵𝑇𝑄𝐼𝐴+?
𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜. 𝐴 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒́𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠, 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑒 𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑎. 𝑈𝑚 𝐵𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝐸𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑎 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑛𝑜́𝑠, 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎.
𝑁𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜, 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝐺𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑇𝑟𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑙ℎ𝑜 𝐿𝐺𝐵𝑇𝑄𝐼+ 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑜́𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑛𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑒𝑟. 𝐴𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚, 𝑒́ 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑜́𝑟𝑔𝑎̃𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑠, 𝑒́ 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑜 𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒. 𝐴 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑧 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑔𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑣𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑏𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎, 𝑑𝑎𝑖́ 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝐹𝑜́𝑟𝑢𝑚 𝐿𝐺𝐵𝑇𝑄𝐼+. 𝑄𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑖́𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎, 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑡𝑜́𝑝𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑚 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑒𝑟 𝑒 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑝𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑎̀ 𝑠𝑢𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒.
𝑄𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑔𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠?
𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑣𝑒𝑧 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑟𝑒̂𝑠, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑛𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑣𝑒 𝑎 𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝐿𝐺𝐵𝑇𝑄𝐼𝐴+. 𝑀𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑟 𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑜𝑠 𝑒𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑟𝑎́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑣𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙. 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜, 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑟 𝑣𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒.
𝐴 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑢𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑎𝑑𝑣𝑒̂𝑚. 𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎𝑙𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑟, 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙, 𝑎 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑧𝑎 𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑟 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑜 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒̂𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒̂𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑖𝑠 𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑠. 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑛𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑎-𝑎-𝑑𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚, 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑜 𝑙𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑒́ 𝑛𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑏𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑠𝑑𝑒 𝑎 𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑠𝑎𝑢́𝑑𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑑𝑜𝑠, 𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑔𝑒́𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑜 𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑎𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑝𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑠 𝑔𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠.
𝐹𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑚 𝑓𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑒́ 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙. 𝑆𝑒 𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑖́𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑛𝑜𝑡𝑜́𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑟 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑚 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑖́𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑜 𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑚, 𝑒́ 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑜 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒. 𝐴𝑑𝑎𝑝𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒̂𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎, 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑏𝑎𝑟 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑎𝑐ℎ𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑎𝑚 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑧𝑖𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑔𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝑝𝑙𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑜.
𝐴 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝐿𝐺𝐵𝑇𝑄𝐼𝐴+ 𝑒 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑓𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑛𝑢𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑐̧𝑜 𝑢́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑛𝑎 𝑙𝑒𝑖 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖́𝑝𝑖𝑜 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑢𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑒𝑠𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑠, 𝑑𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑙𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑠, 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙, 𝑒𝑡𝑐. 𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚 𝑜𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑔𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑖́𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑣𝑎𝑖 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑒́𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑟 𝑎𝑠 𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑖𝑟 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑙ℎ𝑜𝑟. 𝑆𝑜́ 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑎 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑚 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑛𝑜 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑜 𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎́𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑜.
𝐸𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒́ 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑎, 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑔𝑒 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑝𝑡𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑙 𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑚𝑒𝑖𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑑𝑒́𝑚𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑎𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙. 𝑀𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎. 𝑇𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑙𝑢/𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑢 𝑜𝑢 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑒𝑚 𝑛𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑛𝑎 𝑙𝑖́𝑛𝑔𝑢𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑢𝑚 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑐𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜. 𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑣𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑧𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑗𝑎́ 𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑛𝑜𝑢 𝑝𝑎𝑑𝑟𝑎̃𝑜 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜 𝑑𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒. 𝐸́ 𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑠𝑎̃𝑜 𝑜𝑢𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑠. 𝐸 𝑒́ 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝐵𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑜.
𝐴𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑎́𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑠 𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑞𝑢𝑖 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑖 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜̃𝑒𝑚 𝑢𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑧 𝑑𝑒, 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜 𝑠𝑜́ 𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑟 𝑣𝑜𝑧𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑎 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑠𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑒 𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙, 𝑚𝑎𝑠 𝑡𝑎𝑚𝑏𝑒́𝑚 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑎 𝑜𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑟 𝑎𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑜 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝐿𝐺𝐵𝑇𝑄𝐼𝐴+. 𝐴𝑏𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑜 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑜 𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑛𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑟𝑑𝑎 𝑒 𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑐̧𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑢́𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒.
𝑁𝑎̃𝑜 𝑝𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑙𝑔𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑟 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑖́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑒𝑑𝑜 𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎 𝑠𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑠 𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑎 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑛𝑜́𝑠, 𝑛𝑜𝑠 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑐̧𝑎𝑚 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑚𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑜 𝑖𝑔𝑢𝑎𝑙𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒. 𝐸𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒𝑣𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑎 𝑛𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑎 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑎̃𝑜, 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑎𝑟 𝑣𝑜𝑧 𝑎 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑑𝑎𝑑𝑒 𝑞𝑢𝑒, 𝑒𝑚 𝑃𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑔𝑎𝑙, 𝑛𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑎 𝑎 𝑡𝑒𝑣𝑒, 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑜𝑧𝑖𝑛ℎ𝑒𝑠 𝑛𝑜 𝑖𝑛𝑖́𝑐𝑖𝑜. 𝑆𝑜́ 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑎́ 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑠𝑖́𝑣𝑒𝑙 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑚𝑢𝑑𝑎𝑛𝑐̧𝑎 𝑞𝑢𝑒 𝑎𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑜𝑎𝑠 𝑛𝑎̃𝑜-𝑏𝑖𝑛𝑎́𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑚.
* Estudante de Química e investigador na Universidade de Coimbra. Ativista interseccional pelo direito à cidade, ensino superior e direitos das minorias, principalmente por via do coletivo Porta Adentro.
IN "ESQUERDA" - 13/01/24 .
