𝖮 𝖼𝗈𝗉𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗏𝗈 𝖾, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝖺 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺, 𝗆𝖾𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝗎𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖻𝖾𝖻𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗉𝗈, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺́𝗀𝗎𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖾. 𝖠𝗌 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗌 “𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌” (𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗆!) 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗅𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗏𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗌𝖺̃𝗈.
𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾́𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗈, 𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾́𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗅𝗏𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝗂𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗉𝗋𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗎𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝖺𝗊𝗎𝗂, 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗎𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾 (𝖽𝖾𝗌)𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂́𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝖾 𝗏𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖾. 𝖴𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗁𝗈 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗌, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖾 𝖺 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾.
𝖭𝗎𝗆 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈́𝗑𝗂𝗆𝗈, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗁𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌, 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌. 𝖲𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂́𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾́𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝖼𝗎𝗃𝖺 𝗉𝗅𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 “𝖽𝗂𝗇𝖺̂𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺” 𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖠𝗌 𝗈𝖻𝗌𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌, 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗏𝖾𝗓𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈, 𝖽𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗆-𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂́𝖽𝗎𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗅𝗎𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺 𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝖺́𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖽𝗈, 𝖾𝗑𝖼𝗅𝗎𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺. 𝖳𝗎𝖽𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈.
𝖤, 𝖺𝗂! 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾́𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗈, 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝖺, 𝖾 𝗈𝗇𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼̧𝖺 𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾́𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗈. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗎́𝗅𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖺, 𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗎𝗅𝖺𝖽𝖺. 𝖤𝗇𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗓𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗇𝗈́𝗌 𝖺̀ 𝖻𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈-𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅.
𝖠 𝖻𝗈𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗌𝗎𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗀𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖾́ 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗋 𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾̂𝗆 𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈́𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝖺́𝗌𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌.
𝖬𝖺𝗍𝗍 𝖶𝖺𝗅𝗌𝗁, 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖺𝗓 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗋. 𝖠 𝗆𝗂𝗆 𝖿𝖾𝗓. 𝖤 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗆 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗍𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝗈𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗋, 𝗍𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖾́𝗆 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗎 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾. 𝖠 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝖾́ 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝗋𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌𝖺 𝖾 𝖾́ 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌, 𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗀𝗈𝗌, 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖺́𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗌: 𝗎𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝖽𝗂𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺, 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗋 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝖺𝗇𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗆𝗈𝗌, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗃𝗎𝗂́𝗓𝖺, 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖼𝗂𝗋𝗎𝗋𝗀𝗂𝖺̃, 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺̃𝗈…𝖰𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗇𝗈́𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗌𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾.
𝖧𝖺́ 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗌𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌; 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗌, 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗏𝗂́𝖽𝗎𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈́𝗀𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖺̀ 𝗏𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗋 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝗅𝗁𝖾𝗋; 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈, 𝖾́ 𝗈 𝖻𝖾𝖼𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗌𝖺𝗂́𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾́𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗈𝖼𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌, 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗎𝗉𝗍𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗎𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺; 𝖾 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗋𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌, 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗅𝗂́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗎𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾.
𝖴𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗉𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗈𝗌 𝗁𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖿𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗀𝗂𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖫𝖦𝖡𝖳𝖰𝖨𝖠+, 𝗇𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂́𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝗀𝖾́𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗈, 𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝖾́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝗎́𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌, 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗌.
𝖭𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗇𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝖼𝗎𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖿𝗈𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾́𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗈 𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖠𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗎𝖽𝗈, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖺̀ 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗀𝖾𝗆 𝗎́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗀𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗆𝗈 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈.