..

XL-OS RIOS E A VIDA
1- RIO VIZELA
DA NASCENTE À FOZ/7
UM CAMINHO DE AMOR




FONTE:   Manuel Mendes Marques

NR: Este precioso documentário datado de 1990/91 é exemplo de que quando se quer o trabalho de excelência aparece. Provavelmente paisagens aqui reproduzidas já não existem fica o registo histórico para o futuro. BEM HAJA 
.
.
CHRISTIAN SIRIANO
Runway Fashion
New York 
2022



FONTE:   Fashion Channel.

 .

IIᚺᛁᛢᚾᛜ́ᚱᛁᚣ ᚧᚣ ᛖᚣᚾᛊᛖᚣ́ᚾᛁᛈᚣ ᚹᚣᚱᚣ ᚹᚱᛜᚪᛊᛢᛢᛜᚱᛊᛢ

ᛊ ᚾᚣᛖᛒᛊ́ᛖ ᚹᚣᚱᚣ ᛈⳘᚱᛁᛜᛢᛜᛢ

7 - Números no Egito Antigo



* Professor: João Bosco Pitombeira

FONTE:   Prof. Leo Akio
.
NR: Mais um extraordinário professor, se acha que não gosta de matemática aprenda a gostar com este mestre.
.

JOÃO VASCONCELOS

 .




O(s) Imperialismo(s) e a

 Guerra Rússia-Ucrânia

As exigências pelo fim da guerra e o regresso à paz passam pelo combate à crescente militarização, pela condenação da expansão do cordão de bases da NATO ao longo das fronteiras da Federação Russa

𝒪 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜, 𝓃𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝒾𝓃𝒾𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓇𝓇𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒, 𝑒́ 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑜𝓂𝒾́𝓃𝒾𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒾𝓉𝑜𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁, 𝒸𝓊𝓁𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓁 𝑒 𝑒𝒸𝑜𝓃𝑜́𝓂𝒾𝒸𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓃𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓈 𝓃𝒶𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈. 𝒩𝒶 𝒜𝓃𝓉𝒾𝑔𝓊𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓃𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓂𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝒾𝓇𝑜𝓈 𝑒𝓍𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓁𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝓅𝒶𝓃𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒾𝓉𝑜𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝑜 ℰ𝑔𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝒜𝓃𝓉𝒾𝑔𝑜 (ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜 ℋ𝒾𝓉𝒾𝓉𝒶), 𝒶 ℳ𝒶𝒸𝑒𝒹𝑜́𝓃𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝒜𝓁𝑒𝓍𝒶𝓃𝒹𝓇𝑒, 𝒶 𝒢𝓇𝑒́𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝑒 𝑜 ℐ𝓂𝓅𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝑜 ℛ𝑜𝓂𝒶𝓃𝑜. 𝒩𝒶 𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 ℳ𝑒́𝒹𝒾𝒶 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶𝒾́𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓉𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝑜 ℐ𝓈𝓁𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑜 ℐ𝓂𝓅𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝒯𝓊𝓇𝒸𝑜. 𝒜 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝓇 𝒹𝑜 𝒮𝑒́𝒸𝓊𝓁𝑜 𝒳𝒱ℐ, 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝑜𝓈 𝒟𝑒𝓈𝒸𝑜𝒷𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜𝓈, 𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝑒𝓊𝓇𝑜𝓅𝑒𝓊 𝒶𝒻𝒾𝓇𝓂𝑜𝓊 𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝒶 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶 𝒶𝑜 𝒹𝑜𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓇 𝓂𝓊𝒾𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝓅𝑜𝓋𝑜𝓈, 𝑒𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒸𝓊𝓁𝒶𝓇 𝑒𝓂 𝒜́𝒻𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝑒 𝓃𝒶 𝒜́𝓈𝒾𝒶.

𝒪𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝒸𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓋𝒶𝓂 𝑜𝒷𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝓂𝒶𝓉𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓈-𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓂𝒶𝓈, 𝓂𝒶̃𝑜-𝒹𝑒-𝑜𝒷𝓇𝒶 𝒷𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓉𝒶 𝑒 𝓂𝑒𝓇𝒸𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝓊𝓂𝒾𝒹𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈. 𝒰𝓂𝒶 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝒶𝓇𝒶𝒸𝓉𝑒𝓇𝒾́𝓈𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓉𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝑒𝓇𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓊 𝒹𝑜𝓂𝒾́𝓃𝒾𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝒷𝓊𝓈𝒸𝒶𝓋𝒶 𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝒶 𝒿𝓊𝓈𝓉𝒾𝒻𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 𝓉𝓇𝑒̂𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓂𝒾𝓈𝓈𝒶𝓈: 𝑜 𝑒𝓉𝓃𝑜𝒸𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜, 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓋𝒶 𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓇𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝓁𝑔𝓊𝓃𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓋𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜𝓈; 𝑜 𝒹𝒶𝓇𝓌𝒾𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁, 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓉𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓋𝑜𝒸𝒶𝒹𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝓉𝑒𝑜𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝑒𝓋𝑜𝓁𝓊𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜, 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝒸𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝑒𝓍𝓅𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓇 𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒻𝓇𝒶𝒸𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝓋𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝒶̀ 𝓈𝑒𝓁𝑒𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓃𝒶𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓁; 𝑜 𝓇𝒶𝒸𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜, 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝒽𝓊𝓂𝒶𝓃𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒾𝓋𝒾𝒹𝒾𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝑒𝓂 𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶 𝑒́ 𝓈𝓊𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓇 𝒶̀𝓈 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓈.

𝒩𝑜𝓈 𝒻𝒾𝓃𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒹𝑜 𝓈𝑒́𝒸𝓊𝓁𝑜 𝒳ℐ𝒳 𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝓁𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓂-𝓈𝑒 𝓃𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓇𝓇𝒾𝒹𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝑔𝓁𝑜𝒷𝒶𝓁, 𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶𝒸𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓇𝒶́ 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝒸𝒶𝒹𝑒𝒶𝓇 𝒶 𝓇𝒾𝓋𝒶𝓁𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑒 𝑒𝓁𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒻𝑜𝒾 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓃𝒸𝒾𝓅𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒸𝒶𝓊𝓈𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶 ℐ 𝒢𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 ℳ𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓁. 𝒞𝑜𝓂𝑒𝒸̧𝒶𝓋𝒶 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓂 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝒶 𝑒𝓇𝒶 𝒹𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜, 𝒷𝑒𝓂 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝒾𝓃𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓇 ℒ𝑒𝓃𝒾𝓃𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝒶 𝓇𝒾𝓋𝒶𝓁𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑒 𝒶𝓈 𝓋𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓉𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝓋𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒶̀ 𝒽𝑒𝑔𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓃𝒾𝒶 𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓁. 𝒞𝑜𝓂 𝒶 𝓋𝒾𝓉𝑜́𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒜𝓁𝒾𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓃𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶, 𝑜𝓈 ℰ. 𝒰. 𝒜. 𝓇𝑒𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶𝓂 𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝒻𝓁𝓊𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝑒 𝒶𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓃𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝓃𝒶 ℰ𝓊𝓇𝑜𝓅𝒶, 𝑒𝓃𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜𝓈 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓁𝒶𝓅𝓈𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓂 – 𝑜 𝒶𝓁𝑒𝓂𝒶̃𝑜, 𝑜 𝒶𝓊𝓈𝓉𝓇𝑜-𝒽𝓊́𝓃𝑔𝒶𝓇𝑜, 𝑜 𝓇𝓊𝓈𝓈𝑜 𝑒 𝑜 𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒸𝑜, 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒽𝑒𝒸𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝑜𝓉𝑜𝓂𝒶𝓃𝑜. ℋ𝒶́ 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝑒𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒸𝑒𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓃𝑜 𝓈𝓊𝓇𝑔𝒾𝓊 𝓃𝑜 𝒻𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝒹𝑜 𝓈𝑒́𝒸𝓊𝓁𝑜 𝒳ℐ𝒳 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝑜𝓈 ℰ. 𝒰. 𝒜. 𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒸𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝒶 𝒢𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 ℳ𝑒𝓍𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓃𝑜-𝒜𝓂𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓃𝒶, 𝒿𝓊𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓂 𝒶𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓊 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒾𝓉𝑜́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝑜𝓈 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑜 𝒯𝑒𝓍𝒶𝓈, 𝒩𝑜𝓋𝑜 ℳ𝑒́𝓍𝒾𝒸𝑜, 𝒞𝒶𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑜́𝓇𝓃𝒾𝒶 𝑒 𝒜𝓇𝒾𝓏𝑜𝓃𝒶. 𝒩𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒶𝓁𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶, 𝑜𝓈 ℰ. 𝒰. 𝒜. 𝒶𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓋𝒶𝓂 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒸𝓁𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝓅𝒶𝓃𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶, 𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒯𝒽𝑒𝑜𝒹𝑜𝓇𝑒 ℛ𝑜𝑜𝓈𝑒𝓋𝑒𝓁𝓉 𝑒𝓃𝒸𝑜𝓇𝒶𝒿𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒶 𝑒𝓍𝓅𝒶𝓃𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒𝓂 𝒹𝒾𝓇𝑒𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒶̀𝓈 𝒞𝒶𝓇𝒶𝒾́𝒷𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝒶𝑜 𝒫𝒶𝒸𝒾́𝒻𝒾𝒸𝑜, 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝒞𝓊𝒷𝒶 𝑒 𝒹𝒶𝓈 ℱ𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓅𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝑜𝓈 𝑒𝓈𝓅𝒶𝓃𝒽𝑜́𝒾𝓈.

𝒜𝓅𝑜́𝓈 𝒶 ℐ 𝒢𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 ℳ𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓈𝓉𝑒-𝓈𝑒 𝒶̀ 𝒻𝑒𝓇𝑜𝓏 𝓁𝓊𝓉𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓂𝑒𝓇𝒸𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝑒 𝒶̀ 𝒶𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓃𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝑜 𝓉𝒾𝓅𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 – 𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝒾𝒹𝑒𝑜𝓁𝑜́𝑔𝒾𝒸𝑜 𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝓁𝒶𝓈𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒻𝑜𝒾 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝒶𝓊𝓈𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶 ℐℐ 𝒢𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 ℳ𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓁. 𝒪 𝑒𝓍𝓅𝑜𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝓂𝒶́𝓍𝒾𝓂𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓉𝑒 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝒻𝑜𝒾 𝑜 ℐℐℐ ℛ𝑒𝒾𝒸𝒽 𝑔𝑒𝓇𝓂𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒸𝑜 𝒹𝑒 ℋ𝒾𝓉𝓁𝑒𝓇. ℰ𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑒 𝒶𝓁𝑔𝓊𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝑒𝓆𝓊𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝓉𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓈 𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒𝒹𝒶 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓈 𝒽𝒾𝓉𝓁𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓃𝑜 𝑒 𝒿𝒶𝓅𝑜𝓃𝑒̂𝓈, 𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶 𝒹𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓁𝑜𝓃𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝑒𝓊𝓇𝑜𝓅𝑒𝓊, 𝒻𝓇𝓊𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒷𝑒𝓇𝓉𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝓃𝓉𝒾𝑔𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓁𝑜́𝓃𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝒹𝑜𝓂𝒾́𝓃𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝒻𝓁𝓊𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝑒𝒸𝑜𝓃𝑜́𝓂𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝑒 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒹𝑜𝓈 ℰ. 𝒰. 𝒜. 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒹𝑜.

𝒜𝓅𝑜́𝓈 𝑜 𝒻𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝒹𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝑒, 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒸𝓇𝑒𝓉𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒, 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶 𝓈𝑜𝓋𝒾𝑒́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶, 𝒶 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝓇 𝒹𝑒 𝟷𝟿𝟻𝟹, 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒩𝒾𝓀𝒾𝓉𝒶 𝒦𝒽𝓇𝓊𝓈𝒽𝒸𝒽𝑒𝓋, 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓈𝓉𝑒-𝓈𝑒 𝒶𝑜 𝒶𝓅𝒶𝓇𝑒𝒸𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝓅𝒶𝓃𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝓋𝒾𝑒́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜, 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 ℋ𝓊𝓃𝑔𝓇𝒾𝒶, 𝑒𝓂 𝟷𝟿𝟻𝟼, 𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒞𝒽𝑒𝒸𝑜𝓈𝓁𝑜𝓋𝒶́𝓆𝓊𝒾𝒶, 𝑒𝓂 𝟷𝟿𝟼𝟾, 𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝒻𝓁𝓊𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒾𝓂𝑒 𝒶𝓃𝑔𝑜𝓁𝒶𝓃𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶 𝑒𝒸𝓁𝑜𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝒸𝒾𝓋𝒾𝓁, 𝑒𝓂 𝟷𝟿𝟽𝟻, 𝑒 𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒜𝒻𝑒𝑔𝒶𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶̃𝑜, 𝑒𝓂 𝟷𝟿𝟽𝟿. ℰ́ 𝒸𝑒𝓇𝓉𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶 𝒰.ℛ.𝒮.𝒮. 𝒶𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒́𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒻𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜𝓈, 𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝒾𝓃𝓈𝓉𝓇𝓊𝓉𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝒶𝒸𝒶𝒷𝑜𝓊 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝓊𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝓅𝑒𝓁 𝓇𝑒𝓁𝑒𝓋𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝓃𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒷𝑒𝓇𝓉𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓋𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓁𝑜𝓃𝒾𝒶𝒾𝓈. 𝒩𝑜 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑜, 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑜𝓋𝒾𝑒́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜𝓈 𝒶𝒸𝒶𝒷𝒶𝓋𝒶𝓂 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝒹𝑜𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓇 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓊𝓈 𝑔𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝑜𝓈 𝑒𝓍𝑒𝓇𝒸𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓈𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝓅𝓁𝑜𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓇𝑒𝒸𝓊𝓇𝓈𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈𝑒𝓈. 𝒪 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝓈𝑜𝓋𝒾𝑒́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜 𝒸𝒽𝑒𝑔𝑜𝓊 𝒶𝑜 𝒻𝒾𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒𝒹𝒶 𝑒 𝒶 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓈𝑜𝓁𝓊𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒰.ℛ.𝒮.𝒮 𝑒𝓂 𝟷𝟿𝟿𝟷.

𝒜 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝓇 𝒹𝑒 𝟷𝟿𝟿𝟷 𝑜𝓈 ℰ.𝒰.𝒜., 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓃𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾́𝑜𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝒶 “𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝒻𝓇𝒾𝒶” 𝓇𝒾𝓋𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓏𝒶𝓋𝒶𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶 𝒰𝓃𝒾𝒶̃𝑜 𝒮𝑜𝓋𝒾𝑒́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝒽𝑒𝑔𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓃𝒾𝒶 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓁, 𝓅𝓇𝒶𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝑜 “𝑒𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓁𝒾́𝒷𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓇𝑜𝓇”, 𝓋𝒾𝓈𝓉𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓂 𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝓊𝒶𝓈 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓉𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝓃𝓊𝒸𝓁𝑒𝒶𝓇𝑒𝓈, 𝓅𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝒶 𝒹𝑜𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓇 𝑜 𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝓂𝒶 𝓊𝓃𝒾𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒶𝓇. 𝒜 𝓈𝓊𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝒾𝓇𝒶 𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒷𝑒𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶, 𝒶𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒́𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝒩𝒜𝒯𝒪, 𝒻𝑜𝒾 𝒹𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝒥𝓊𝑔𝑜𝓈𝓁𝒶́𝓋𝒾𝒶 𝑒𝓂 𝟷𝟿𝟿𝟿, 𝒸𝓊𝒿𝒶 𝑜𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓋𝒾𝓈𝒶𝓋𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝑜𝓈 𝒶𝒷𝓊𝓈𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝒾𝓇𝑒𝒾𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝒽𝓊𝓂𝒶𝓃𝑜𝓈 𝓃𝑜 𝒦𝑜𝓈𝑜𝓋𝑜. 𝒪𝓈 𝒶𝓉𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓈 𝒶𝑒́𝓇𝑒𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝒶 “𝒪𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 ℱ𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶 𝒜𝓁𝒾𝒶𝒹𝒶” 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒹𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝒹𝑒 𝟸𝟺 𝒹𝑒 𝓂𝒶𝓇𝒸̧𝑜 𝒶 𝟷𝟶 𝒹𝑒 𝒿𝓊𝓃𝒽𝑜 𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓃𝑔𝒾𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝒹𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒𝓈 𝓈𝑒́𝓇𝓋𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 ℬ𝑒𝓁𝑔𝓇𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝑒 𝒩𝑜𝓋𝒾 𝒮𝒶𝒹, 𝓁𝑒𝓋𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝒶̀ 𝓂𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝒾𝓋𝒾𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝑜𝒸𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝒶̀ 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓉𝓇𝓊𝒾𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝒻𝓇𝒶𝑒𝓈𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶 𝒸𝒾𝓋𝒾𝓁 𝑒 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒾𝒶̃𝑜. ℱ𝑜𝒾 𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝒾𝓇𝒶 𝓋𝑒𝓏 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶 𝒩𝒜𝒯𝒪 𝓊𝓈𝑜𝓊 𝒶 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝓈𝑒𝓂 𝒶 𝒶𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓋𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒞𝑜𝓃𝓈𝑒𝓁𝒽𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒮𝑒𝑔𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒩𝒶𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝒰𝓃𝒾𝒹𝒶𝓈.

𝒞𝑜𝓂 𝑜𝓊 𝓈𝑒𝓂 𝒩𝒶𝓉𝑜, 𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓃𝑜 𝓋𝒶𝒾 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝒾𝓃𝓊𝒶𝓇 𝒶 𝒶𝓋𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶𝓇 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒜𝒻𝑒𝑔𝒶𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒𝓂 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟷, 𝒶𝓅𝑜́𝓈 𝑜𝓈 𝒶𝓉𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝑜 𝟷𝟷 𝒹𝑒 𝓈𝑒𝓉𝑒𝓂𝒷𝓇𝑜, 𝑜𝓃𝒹𝑒 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟶 𝓂𝒾𝓁 𝒸𝒾𝓋𝒾𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝓂𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶, 𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒 𝑜𝒸𝓊𝓅𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜 ℐ𝓇𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒, 𝑒𝓂 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟹, 𝓃𝒶 𝒸𝒽𝒶𝓂𝒶𝒹𝒶 “𝒮𝑒𝑔𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒶 𝒢𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝒹𝑜 𝒢𝑜𝓁𝒻𝑜”. ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒢𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝒹𝑜 ℐ𝓇𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒, 𝑒𝓂 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑜𝓈 ℰ.𝒰.𝒜. 𝓁𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓏𝒶̃𝑜 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝓂𝓊𝓁𝓉𝒾𝓃𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝓁 𝒷𝒶𝓈𝑒𝑜𝓊-𝓈𝑒 𝓃𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒾𝓇𝒶, 𝒹𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒾𝓂𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒮𝒶𝒹𝒹𝒶𝓂 ℋ𝓊𝓈𝓈𝑒𝒾𝓃 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓅𝓊𝓃𝒽𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓉𝓇𝓊𝒾𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓂𝒶𝒸𝒾𝒸̧𝒶. 𝒜 𝑜𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 “𝒞𝒽𝑜𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒 𝒫𝒶𝓋𝑜𝓇” 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒾𝓊 𝓃𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓈𝒶𝒹𝒶 𝒸𝒶𝓂𝓅𝒶𝓃𝒽𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝒷𝑜𝓂𝒷𝒶𝓇𝒹𝑒𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝒶𝑒́𝓇𝑒𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝓇𝑒 ℬ𝒶𝑔𝒹𝒶𝒹 𝑒 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓃𝒸𝒾𝓅𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒸𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒𝓈 𝒾𝓇𝒶𝓆𝓊𝒾𝒶𝓃𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒹𝓊𝓏𝒾𝓊 𝒶𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓁𝒶𝓅𝓈𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝑜 ℬ𝒶𝒶𝓉𝒽𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝑒 𝒶𝑜 𝒹𝑜𝓂𝒾́𝓃𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈. 𝒞𝑜𝓂 𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝓉𝒾𝓇𝒶𝒹𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝓉𝓇𝑜𝓅𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓃𝒶𝓈 𝑒𝓂 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟷 𝒻𝒾𝒸𝑜𝓊 𝓊𝓂 𝓇𝒶𝓈𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓉𝓇𝓊𝒾𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓁𝑜𝓈𝓈𝒶𝓁 𝑒 𝒶 𝓂𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝓂𝑒𝒾𝑜 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒽𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑜𝒶𝓈, 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝒸𝒾𝓋𝒾𝓈. ℰ𝓂 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟷 𝑜𝓈 ℰ.𝒰.𝒜. 𝑒 𝒶 𝒩𝒜𝒯𝒪 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓋𝒾𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝓃𝒶 ℒ𝒾́𝒷𝒾𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒾𝓂𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒦𝒶𝒹𝒽𝒶𝒻𝒾 𝑒 𝓃𝑜 𝒶𝓅𝑜𝒾𝑜 𝒶𝑜𝓈 𝓇𝑒𝒷𝑒𝓁𝒹𝑒𝓈. 𝒜𝓈 𝓋𝒶𝑔𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒷𝑜𝓂𝒷𝒶𝓇𝒹𝑒𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓉𝓇𝓊𝒾́𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝓊𝓂 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒶𝓋𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒜́𝒻𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝑒 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓂-𝓃𝑜 𝒶𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓃𝒽𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶𝒾𝓃𝒹𝒶 𝒽𝑜𝒿𝑒 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓅𝓊𝓉𝒶𝓂 𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒾𝓉𝑜́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑒 𝓈𝒾. 𝒪 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑒-𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓃𝑜 𝒹𝑜𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓋𝒶 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒾𝓂, 𝒹𝑒 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝓂𝒶 𝓊𝓃𝒾𝓁𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓁, 𝒶 𝑔𝑒𝑜𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝑒 𝒶 𝑒𝒸𝑜𝓃𝑜𝓂𝒾𝒶 𝒶 𝓃𝒾́𝓋𝑒𝓁 𝑔𝓁𝑜𝒷𝒶𝓁.

𝒩𝒶𝓈 𝓊́𝓁𝓉𝒾𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒́𝒸𝒶𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝑜𝓈 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝒶 𝒶𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓃𝓈𝒶̃𝑜, 𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝒸̧𝒶𝓇 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝒞𝒽𝒾𝓃𝒶, 𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓁 𝒿𝒶́ 𝑒́ 𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝒾𝓇𝒶 𝑒𝒸𝑜𝓃𝑜𝓂𝒾𝒶 𝒶 𝓃𝒾́𝓋𝑒𝓁 𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓁, 𝓊𝓁𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓅𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝑜́𝓅𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓈 ℰ.𝒰.𝒜. 𝒩𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒽𝑜𝒿𝑒 𝒶 𝒞𝒽𝒾𝓃𝒶 𝑒𝓍𝑒𝓇𝒸𝑒 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝒾𝓃𝒻𝓁𝓊𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓇𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝑒 𝑒𝒸𝑜𝓃𝑜́𝓂𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑜́ 𝓃𝑜 𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝒶𝓈𝒾𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜, 𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝓉𝒶𝓂𝒷𝑒́𝓂 𝑒𝓍𝓅𝒶𝓃𝒹𝒾𝓃𝒹𝑜-𝒶 𝓃𝒶 ℰ𝓊𝓇𝑜𝓅𝒶, 𝓃𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝒾𝓃𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒶𝒻𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓃𝑜, 𝒜𝓂𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒞𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓁 𝑒 𝒞𝒶𝓇𝒶𝒾́𝒷𝒶𝓈. ℰ́ 𝒸𝓊𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓈𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝓊𝒶𝓈 𝓊́𝓁𝓉𝒾𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒾𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝒶𝓁𝓋𝑜 𝒹𝒶 “𝒹𝒾𝓅𝓁𝑜𝓂𝒶𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝑜́𝓁𝒶𝓇” 𝓃𝑜 𝒾𝓃𝒾́𝒸𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝓈𝑒́𝒸𝓊𝓁𝑜 𝒳𝒳, 𝓉𝑜𝓇𝓃𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓂-𝓈𝑒 𝒶𝓁𝓋𝑜 𝒹𝒶 “𝒹𝒾𝓅𝓁𝑜𝓂𝒶𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑜 𝓎𝓊𝒶𝓃” 𝓃𝑜 𝓈𝑒́𝒸𝓊𝓁𝑜 𝒳𝒳ℐ. 𝒞𝑜𝓂 “𝒶 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝒶 𝓇𝑜𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝓈𝑒𝒹𝒶”, 𝒹𝑒𝓃𝑜𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝒹𝒶 ℐ𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓋𝒶 𝒞𝒾𝓃𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶 𝑒 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝓇𝒶𝒹𝒶, 𝒹𝑜𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝒹𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝒞𝒽𝒾𝓃𝒶, 𝑜𝓈 ℰ.𝒰.𝒜 𝓈𝑒𝓇𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒶 𝒻𝒶𝓏𝑒𝓇 𝓋𝒶𝓁𝑒𝓇 𝒶𝓈 𝓈𝓊𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝓁𝒾𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝓉𝓇𝓊𝒾́𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝓃𝒶 “𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝒻𝓇𝒾𝒶” 𝑒 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒻𝓁𝒾𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒𝓂 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝓊𝓇𝑔𝒾𝓇. 𝒜 𝓃𝒾́𝓋𝑒𝓁 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇, 𝒶 𝒞𝒽𝒾𝓃𝒶 𝓃𝓊𝒸𝓁𝑒𝒶𝓇 𝑒́ 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝑜𝓇𝑒𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓉𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝒶 𝓃𝒾́𝓋𝑒𝓁 𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓊𝓈 “𝒶𝓅𝑒𝓉𝒾𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈” 𝒿𝒶́ 𝓈𝑒 𝒻𝒾𝓏𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝓃𝑜𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓋𝑜𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝒶 𝓋𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝓃𝑜 𝒫𝒶𝒸𝒾́𝒻𝒾𝒸𝑜. 𝒜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝒾𝓁𝒽𝒶 𝓈𝑒𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝒯𝒶𝒾𝓌𝒶𝓃 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒹𝓊𝓏𝒾𝓇 𝒶 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒻𝓇𝑜𝓃𝓉𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝒾𝓇𝑒𝓉𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝑜𝓈 ℰ.𝒰.𝒜.

𝒰𝓂 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝑒𝓂 𝒶𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓃𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑜 ℛ𝓊𝓈𝓈𝑜 𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶𝑔𝑜𝓇𝒶 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶́ 𝒶 𝓂𝑜𝓈𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓇 𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝒶𝓈 𝑔𝒶𝓇𝓇𝒶𝓈 𝒽𝑒𝒹𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒 𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝓃𝒶 𝒰𝒸𝓇𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒶. 𝒥𝒶́ 𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓈, 𝑒𝓂 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟾, 𝒫𝓊𝓉𝒾𝓃 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝒹𝒾𝓊 𝑒 𝓁𝑒𝓋𝑜𝓊 𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝒶̀ 𝒢𝑒𝑜́𝓇𝑔𝒾𝒶, 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒹𝓊𝓏𝒾𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝒶̀ 𝑜𝒸𝓊𝓅𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝓉𝓇𝑜𝓅𝒶𝓈 𝓇𝓊𝓈𝓈𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒾𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝒜𝒷𝓀𝒶́𝓏𝒾𝒶 𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝒪𝓈𝓈𝑒́𝓉𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑜 𝒮𝓊𝓁. ℛ𝑒𝓁𝑒𝓂𝒷𝓇𝑒-𝓈𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶𝓈 𝓉𝑜𝓅𝒶𝓈 𝓇𝓊𝓈𝓈𝒶𝓈 𝓂𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒̂𝓂 𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝒸̧𝒶 𝓃𝒶 𝒯𝓇𝒶𝓃𝓈𝓃𝒾́𝓈𝓉𝓇𝒾𝒶, 𝑜𝓊 ℛ𝑒𝓅𝓊́𝒷𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒶 ℳ𝑜𝓁𝒹𝒶́𝓋𝒾𝒶 𝒫𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒹𝓃𝒾𝑒𝓈𝓉𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓃𝒶, 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓈𝑒 𝓈𝑒𝓅𝒶𝓇𝑜𝓊 𝒹𝒶 ℳ𝑜𝓁𝒹𝒶́𝓋𝒾𝒶 𝑒𝓂 𝟷𝟿𝟿𝟶 𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓃𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝟸𝟶𝟶𝟼 𝒶𝓅𝑜𝓃𝓉𝒶 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝑔𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓃𝒶 ℱ𝑒𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 ℛ𝓊𝓈𝓈𝒶. ℰ𝓂 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟺, 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓉𝑒𝓍𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝓅𝑜𝒾𝒶𝓇 𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓁𝒶𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝓇𝓊𝓈𝓈𝑜́𝒻𝑜𝓃𝒶𝓈 𝓃𝒶 𝒰𝒸𝓇𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒶, 𝒫𝓊𝓉𝒾𝓃 𝒶𝓊𝓍𝒾𝓁𝒾𝑜𝓊 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒾𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒟𝑜𝓃𝑒𝓉𝓈𝓀 𝑒 ℒ𝓊𝑔𝒶𝓃𝓈𝓀, 𝓃𝑜 𝒟𝑜𝓃𝒷𝒶𝓈𝓈 𝑒 𝒶𝓃𝑒𝓍𝑜𝓊 𝒶 𝒞𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝒾𝒶. 𝒜 𝓂𝒶́𝓆𝓊𝒾𝓃𝒶 𝒷𝑒𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝓇𝓊𝓈𝓈𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝑔𝓊𝓇𝑜𝓊 𝓃𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒾𝓂𝑒 𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝒾𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇 ℬ𝒶𝓈𝒽𝒶𝓇 𝒶𝓁-𝒜𝓈𝓈𝒶𝒹 𝓃𝒶 𝒮𝒾́𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝑒, 𝒶𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒́𝓈 𝒹𝑜 𝒢𝓇𝓊𝓅𝑜 𝒲𝒶𝑔𝓃𝑒𝓇, 𝓊𝓂 𝑔𝓇𝓊𝓅𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝑒 𝓂𝑒𝓇𝒸𝑒𝓃𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑜𝓇𝒾𝑔𝑒𝓂 𝓇𝓊𝓈𝓈𝒶, 𝒫𝓊𝓉𝒾𝓃 𝒶𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒́𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝒶 𝓊𝓉𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓏𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓂 𝒶𝓊𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓊 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝑒𝓂 𝓋𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝑜 𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒹𝑜, 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑜́ 𝓃𝒶 𝒰𝒸𝓇𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒶 𝑒 𝓃𝒶 𝒮𝒾́𝓇𝒾𝒶, 𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝓉𝒶𝓂𝒷𝑒́𝓂, 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝑒𝓍𝑒𝓂𝓅𝓁𝑜, 𝓃𝒶 ℒ𝒾́𝒷𝒾𝒶, ℳ𝑜𝒸̧𝒶𝓂𝒷𝒾𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒 ℛ𝑒𝓅𝓊́𝒷𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒞𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑜-𝒜𝒻𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓃𝒶. 𝒪𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒾𝑔𝓊𝒶𝓁𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝓃𝒶𝓉𝓊𝓇𝑒𝓏𝒶 𝑒𝒸𝑜𝓃𝑜́𝓂𝒾𝒸𝒶, 𝓅𝑜𝒾𝓈 𝓃𝑒𝓈𝓉𝑒 𝓊́𝓁𝓉𝒾𝓂𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈 𝒶 ℛ𝓊́𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒶 𝑒 𝑜 𝒢𝓇𝓊𝓅𝑜 𝒲𝒶𝑔𝓃𝑒𝓇, 𝒶𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓊 𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝒾𝒸̧𝑜, 𝓂𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒̂𝓂 𝓃𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝑜 𝒫𝓇𝑒𝓈𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 ℱ𝒶𝓊𝓈𝓉𝒾𝓃-𝒜𝓇𝒸𝒽𝒶𝓃𝑔𝑒 𝒯𝑜𝓊𝒶𝒹𝑒́𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝓉𝓇𝑜𝒸𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑜𝓁𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓋𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓂𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓍𝓅𝓁𝑜𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝑜𝓈 𝓇𝑒𝒸𝓊𝓇𝓈𝑜𝓈 𝓃𝒶𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈, 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓈𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝒷𝒶𝓉𝑒 𝓃𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓋𝒾𝑜𝓁𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝒸𝒾𝓋𝒾𝓁 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝒹𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟸.

𝒜𝑔𝑜𝓇𝒶 𝒶 ℛ𝓊́𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒶 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝒹𝑒 𝒫𝓊𝓉𝒾𝓃 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝒹𝒾𝓊 𝒶 𝒰𝒸𝓇𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒶, 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓋𝒾𝑜𝓁𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒻𝓁𝒶𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝒾𝓇𝑒𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒶𝒸𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝓁. 𝒜 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝓇𝓊𝓈𝓈𝒶 𝑒́ 𝒾𝓃𝒶𝒸𝑒𝒾𝓉𝒶́𝓋𝑒𝓁 𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓋𝑒 𝓈𝑒𝓇 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓃𝒶𝒹𝒶 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓉𝑜𝒹𝑜 𝑜 𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒹𝑜. 𝒯𝓇𝒶𝓉𝒶-𝓈𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝓁𝑒𝓋𝒶𝓇 𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝑒 𝒶 𝑜𝒸𝓊𝓅𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒶 𝓊𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈 𝓈𝑜𝒷𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓃𝑜, 𝓇𝑒𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒽𝑒𝒸𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝒪𝒩𝒰. 𝒫𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓅𝑜𝓉𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝓉𝑜𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒶𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝒹𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝓋𝑒𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓃𝒶́-𝓁𝒶 𝒻𝒾𝓇𝓂𝑒𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒, 𝒸𝑜𝓁𝑜𝒸𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜-𝓈𝑒 𝒶𝑜 𝓁𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝑔𝓇𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒾𝓉𝑜𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓅𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝒰𝒸𝓇𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒶. 𝒪 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝒾𝑔𝓃𝒾𝒻𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒶 𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒾𝒻𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓅𝑒𝓉𝒾𝓋𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝑒𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝒶 𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝓁𝓅𝑒 𝒹𝑒 ℰ𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝟸𝟶𝟷𝟺 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓉𝒶𝑔𝑜𝓃𝒾𝓏𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝑒𝓍𝓉𝓇𝑒𝓂𝒶-𝒹𝒾𝓇𝑒𝒾𝓉𝒶, 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓅𝑜𝓃𝓈𝒶́𝓋𝑒𝒾𝓈 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝒾𝓃𝒸𝑒̂𝓃𝒹𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝓈𝑒𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝒾𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝑒𝓂 𝒪𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶 𝑜𝓃𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝒸𝑒𝓇𝒸𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝟺𝟶 𝓅𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑜𝒶𝓈.

𝒫𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝒷𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓇 𝑜 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓋𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝓉𝑒𝓃𝓈𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝑜 𝒻𝒾𝓂 𝒹𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝒸𝒽𝑒𝑔𝒶 𝒶 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑜𝓈𝒾𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓈𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝒶𝑜 𝓈𝒾𝓈𝓉𝑒𝓂𝒶 𝒻𝒾𝓃𝒶𝓃𝒸𝑒𝒾𝓇𝑜 𝒹𝒶 ℛ𝓊́𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒶 𝑒 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓊𝓈 𝑜𝓁𝒾𝑔𝒶𝓇𝒸𝒶𝓈. 𝒜 𝑒𝓈𝒸𝒶𝓁𝒶𝒹𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶, 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝒶𝓁𝑔𝓊𝓃𝓈 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓂, 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓋𝒶𝒾 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓉𝑒𝑔𝑒𝓇 𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓋𝑜 𝓊𝒸𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒾𝒶𝓃𝑜 𝑒 𝓃𝑒𝓂 𝓋𝒶𝒾 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓉𝑒𝑔𝑒𝓇 𝒶 ℰ𝓊𝓇𝑜𝓅𝒶 𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓊𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓋𝑜𝓈, 𝒷𝑒𝓂 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝑜. 𝒪 𝓇𝑒𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝑜 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝒩𝒜𝒯𝒪 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓋𝒶𝒾 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓈𝓊𝒶𝒹𝒾𝓇 𝓃𝒶𝒹𝒶, 𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓋𝒶𝒾 𝑒́ 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓋𝑜𝒸𝒶𝓇 𝒶 𝑒𝓈𝒸𝒶𝓁𝒶𝒹𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒶́ 𝓈𝑒𝓇 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝓃𝓊𝒸𝓁𝑒𝒶𝓇. ℰ́ 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝒸𝒾𝓈𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓉𝑒𝑔𝑒𝓇 𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓁𝒶𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓇 𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝒿𝒶́, 𝒶𝓊𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝒶𝓈 𝓈𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝒶̀ 𝑜𝓁𝒾𝑔𝒶𝓇𝓆𝓊𝒾𝒶 𝓇𝓊𝓈𝓈𝒶 𝑒 𝒶𝓅𝑜𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓇 𝓃𝒶 𝓋𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝒾𝓅𝓁𝑜𝓂𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶, 𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝒶̀ 𝓂𝑒𝓈𝒶 𝓃𝑒𝑔𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝑒𝓂 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒻𝓁𝒾𝓉𝑜.

𝒜𝓈 𝑒𝓍𝒾𝑔𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝒻𝒾𝓂 𝒹𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝑒 𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑜 𝒶̀ 𝓅𝒶𝓏 𝓅𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒶𝓂 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝒷𝒶𝓉𝑒 𝒶̀ 𝒸𝓇𝑒𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇𝒾𝓏𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜, 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓃𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝑒𝓍𝓅𝒶𝓃𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓇𝒹𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝒷𝒶𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝒩𝒜𝒯𝒪 𝒶𝑜 𝓁𝑜𝓃𝑔𝑜 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝒻𝓇𝑜𝓃𝓉𝑒𝒾𝓇𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶 ℱ𝑒𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 ℛ𝓊𝓈𝓈𝒶, 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓅𝑒𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓃𝒸𝒾́𝓅𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝒹𝒾𝓋𝒾𝓈𝒾𝒷𝒾𝓁𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝓈𝑒𝑔𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶 𝑒 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓈𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓉𝓊𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓃𝑒𝓊𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓁𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝒰𝒸𝓇𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒶 𝒶𝓃𝒶́𝓁𝑜𝑔𝑜 𝒶𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓋𝒾𝑔𝑜𝓇𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝒶 ℱ𝒾𝓃𝓁𝒶̂𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒶. 𝒜 𝑒𝓍𝓅𝒶𝓃𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒩𝒜𝒯𝒪 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 ℒ𝑒𝓈𝓉𝑒 – 𝓇𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒶𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒾𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝒶̀ 𝒜𝓁𝒾𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶 𝑜 ℳ𝑜𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓃𝑒𝑔𝓇𝑜 𝑒 𝒶 ℳ𝒶𝒸𝑒𝒹𝑜́𝓃𝒾𝒶 𝒹𝑜 𝒩𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒻𝒶𝓏𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝓊 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒿𝓊𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝟹𝟶 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈𝑒𝓈 – 𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓁𝑒𝓋𝒶𝓇𝒾𝒶 𝒶̀ 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝑔𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒰𝒸𝓇𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒶, 𝒢𝑒𝑜́𝓇𝑔𝒾𝒶 𝑒 ℳ𝑜𝓁𝒹𝒶́𝓋𝒾𝒶, 𝑒𝓍-𝓇𝑒𝓅𝓊́𝒷𝓁𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓈 𝓈𝑜𝓋𝒾𝑒́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓈, 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒶𝒹𝒶 𝓊𝓂𝒶 “𝓁𝒾𝓃𝒽𝒶 𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓂𝑒𝓁𝒽𝒶” 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒫𝓊𝓉𝒾𝓃, 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝓃𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓊 𝒶 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝑒 𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓉𝑒𝓍𝓉𝑜 𝒾𝒹𝑒𝒶𝓁 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝓃𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝒾́𝓈 𝓋𝒾𝓏𝒾𝓃𝒽𝑜.

𝒪 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓈𝑒 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑜̃𝑒 𝑒́ 𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝓉𝒾𝓇𝒶𝒹𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝒫𝑜𝓇𝓉𝓊𝑔𝒶𝓁 𝒹𝒶 𝒩𝒜𝒯𝒪 𝑒 𝒶 𝓈𝓊𝒶 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓈𝑜𝓁𝓊𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜, 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓇𝒶𝒹𝒶 𝑜 𝒷𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝑜 𝒶𝓇𝓂𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝒹𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑒-𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓃𝑜 𝑒 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓈𝑒𝓊𝓈 𝓈𝒶𝓉𝑒́𝓁𝒾𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝒸𝒶𝓃𝒶𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓃𝑜 𝑒 𝑒𝓊𝓇𝑜𝓅𝑒𝓊𝓈. 𝒜𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶𝓁𝑔𝓊𝓃𝓈 𝓃𝑜𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓂 𝒹𝒶𝓇 𝒶 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝒶 𝒩𝒶𝓉𝑜 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝓃𝑒𝓃𝒽𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝑜𝓇𝑔𝒶𝓃𝒾𝓏𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓃𝓈𝒾𝓋𝒶. 𝒬𝓊𝑒 𝑜 𝒹𝒾𝑔𝒶𝓂 𝒶𝓈 𝓈𝓊𝒶𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝑜𝒻𝑒𝓃𝓈𝒾𝓋𝒶𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓋𝑜𝒸𝒶𝓇𝒶𝓂 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝓉𝓇𝓊𝒾𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒 𝓂𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝓃𝒶 𝑒𝓍-𝒥𝓊𝑔𝑜𝓈𝓁𝒶́𝓋𝒾𝒶, 𝒜𝒻𝑒𝑔𝒶𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶̃𝑜, ℐ𝓇𝒶𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒 ℒ𝒾́𝒷𝒾𝒶. 𝒜 𝒩𝒜𝒯𝒪 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓁𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇 𝓈𝒶𝒾́𝒹𝒶 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓋𝑜𝓈. 𝒪 𝓅𝑜𝓋𝑜 𝓊𝒸𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒾𝒶𝓃𝑜 𝒻𝑜𝒾 𝒶𝓅𝒶𝓃𝒽𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝒻𝑒́𝓂 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑒 𝒶 𝒩𝒜𝒯𝒪 𝑒 𝒫𝓊𝓉𝒾𝓃.

𝒩𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝒹𝓇𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒩𝒜𝒯𝒪 𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓅𝑜𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒶̀ 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒰𝒸𝓇𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒶 𝓅𝑒𝓁𝒶 ℛ𝓊́𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒶, 𝒫𝑜𝓇𝓉𝓊𝑔𝒶𝓁 𝓋𝒶𝒾 𝓂𝑜𝒷𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓏𝒶𝓇 𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓁𝑜𝒸𝒶𝓇 𝒶̀ 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓅𝑜𝓈𝒾𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒜𝓁𝒾𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶 𝟷.𝟻𝟸𝟷 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇𝑒𝓈, 𝒶 𝑒𝓃𝓋𝒾𝒶𝓇 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶 ℛ𝑜𝓂𝑒́𝓃𝒾𝒶, 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝑔𝓇𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝑒𝓂 𝒹𝓊𝒶𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶𝓈: 𝒶 𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓂𝑒𝒾𝓇𝒶, 𝒹𝑒 𝓇𝑒𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓂𝓊𝒾𝓉𝑜 𝓇𝒶́𝓅𝒾𝒹𝒶 (𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓃𝓉𝒾𝒹𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝟽 𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓈), 𝑒𝓃𝓋𝑜𝓁𝓋𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝟷.𝟶𝟺𝟿 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇𝑒𝓈, 𝟷 𝓃𝒶𝓋𝒾𝑜, 𝟷𝟼𝟸 𝓋𝒾𝒶𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓈 𝓉𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝟽 𝒶𝑒𝓇𝑜𝓃𝒶𝓋𝑒𝓈, 𝑒 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓈𝑒𝑔𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒶 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓇𝑒𝒻𝑜𝓇𝒸̧𝑜 (𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓃𝓉𝒶 𝑒𝓂 𝟹𝟶 𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓈), 𝓉𝑜𝓉𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓏𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝟺𝟽𝟸 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇𝑒𝓈, 𝟸 𝓃𝒶𝓋𝒾𝑜𝓈 𝑒 𝟹𝟼 𝓋𝒾𝒶𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓈 𝓉𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓈. 𝒯𝓇𝒶𝓉𝒶-𝓈𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒 𝒾𝓇𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓅𝑜𝓃𝓈𝒶𝒷𝒾𝓁𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝓅𝑜𝓇 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝒹𝑜 𝑔𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇𝓃𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓇𝓉𝓊𝑔𝓊𝑒̂𝓈, 𝓅𝑜𝒾𝓈 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓉𝒾𝓋𝒶 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓋𝒶𝒾 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒾𝒷𝓊𝒾𝓇 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓁𝓆𝓊𝑒𝓇 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓈𝓊𝒶𝓈𝒶̃𝑜, 𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝓈𝒾𝓂 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝑜 𝒶𝑔𝓇𝒶𝓋𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝓉𝑒𝓃𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇.

𝒞𝑜𝓂 𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝒰𝒸𝓇𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒶 𝑜 𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝓋𝒶𝒾 𝒹𝑒𝒾𝓍𝒶𝓇 𝒹𝑒 𝓈𝑒𝓇 𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒𝓇𝒶 𝒶𝓉𝑒́ 𝒶𝓆𝓊𝒾. 𝒫𝓊𝓉𝒾𝓃 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓋𝒶𝒾 𝑒 𝓃𝑒𝓂 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝒷𝑒𝓁𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓇 𝒶 𝒶𝓃𝓉𝒾𝑔𝒶 𝒰ℛ𝒮𝒮, 𝓅𝑜𝒾𝓈 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝒽𝑒𝓇𝒹𝑒𝒾𝓇𝑜 𝒹𝒶 ℛ𝑒𝓋𝑜𝓁𝓊𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓊𝒷𝓇𝑜. ℰ𝓁𝑒 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝒽𝑒𝓇𝒹𝑒𝒾𝓇𝑜 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝓂𝑒́𝓉𝑜𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒶𝓊𝓉𝑜𝒸𝓇𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑜 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝑒 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶́ 𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓅𝓊𝓁𝒶𝒸̧𝑜̃𝑒𝓈 𝓇𝓊𝓈𝓈𝑜́𝒻𝑜𝓃𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑜 𝒟𝑜𝓃𝒷𝒶𝓈𝓈, 𝓃𝑒𝓂 𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓋𝑜 𝓇𝓊𝓈𝓈𝑜. 𝒪 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶́ 𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝒻𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝑜𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝒸𝒶𝓂𝒶𝓇𝒾𝓁𝒽𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝑜𝓁𝒾𝑔𝒶𝓇𝒸𝒶𝓈 𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓁 𝑒́ 𝑜 𝒸𝒽𝑒𝒻𝑒. 𝒩𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶 𝒻𝓊𝑔𝒶 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝒻𝓇𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒫𝓊𝓉𝒾𝓃 𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝒸𝒾́𝓇𝒸𝓊𝓁𝑜𝓈 𝑜𝓁𝒾𝑔𝒶́𝓇𝓆𝓊𝒾𝒸𝑜𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓅𝓊𝓁𝓊𝓁𝒶𝓂 𝒶̀ 𝓈𝓊𝒶 𝓋𝑜𝓁𝓉𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓈𝓅𝒾𝓇𝒶𝓂-𝓈𝑒 𝓃𝒶 𝓋𝑒𝓁𝒽𝒶 “𝒶𝓁𝓂𝒶 𝓇𝓊𝓈𝓈𝒶”, 𝓃𝒶 𝒽𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒸̧𝒶 𝒸𝓊𝓁𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓁, 𝓈𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝑒 𝓇𝑒𝓁𝒾𝑔𝒾𝑜𝓈𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝒢𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑒 ℛ𝓊́𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒶, 𝒶 𝒢𝓇𝒶̃-ℛ𝓊́𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒶 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝒹𝑒 𝓂𝒶𝓉𝓇𝒾𝓏 𝒸𝓏𝒶𝓇𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶, 𝒶𝓈𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝓃𝑜 𝓃𝑒𝑜𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝒶𝒹𝑜𝓇𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝒶𝓊𝓉𝑜𝒸𝓇𝒶́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝒶𝑜 𝓃𝑒𝑜𝓁𝒾𝒷𝑒𝓇𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝑒𝒸𝑜𝓃𝑜́𝓂𝒾𝒸𝑜 𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝒸𝓊𝓇𝒶𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓅𝑜𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝒶̀ 𝒶𝓇𝓇𝑜𝑔𝒶̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶 𝑜𝒸𝒾𝒹𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓁. 𝒜 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝒶 ℛ𝓊́𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒶 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁 𝒹𝑒 𝒫𝓊𝓉𝒾𝓃 𝑒𝓈𝓉𝒶́ 𝒶 𝓉𝒾𝓇𝒶𝓇 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝒾𝒹𝑜 𝒹𝒶 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓈𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑜𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑒-𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒸𝒶𝓃𝑜 𝑒 𝒸𝓊𝒿𝑜 𝓊́𝓁𝓉𝒾𝓂𝑜 𝒶𝓉𝑜 𝒻𝑜𝒾 𝒶 𝒹𝑒𝓇𝓇𝑜𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝑜𝓈 ℰ.𝒰.𝒜. 𝑒 𝒹𝒶 𝒩𝒜𝒯𝒪 𝓃𝑜 𝒜𝒻𝑒𝑔𝒶𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶̃𝑜 𝓃𝑜 𝓋𝑒𝓇𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒶𝒹𝑜, 𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝒻𝒾𝑔𝓊𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝓅𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒶𝑔𝑒𝓂 𝒶 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝒶 𝑒𝓉𝒶𝓅𝒶 𝓃𝒶 𝒸𝓇𝒾𝓈𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑜𝓂𝒾𝓃𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒾́𝓉𝒾𝒸𝒶 𝒹𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜. 𝒜𝑔𝑜𝓇𝒶 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑒 𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝒾𝒹𝑒𝑜𝓁𝑜𝑔𝒾𝒶𝓈, 𝓂𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓈𝑒𝓈, 𝒹𝒶 𝓃𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒶𝒸𝑒𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝒶 𝓊𝓂 𝒷𝑜𝓁𝑜 𝓅𝓁𝒶𝓃𝑒𝓉𝒶́𝓇𝒾𝑜, 𝑒𝓍𝒾𝑔𝒾𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝒶 𝓉𝑜𝓉𝒶𝓁𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝒶 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓁𝑜𝓃𝒾𝒶𝓁, 𝑒𝓃𝓆𝓊𝒶𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝒶 𝑜𝓊𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝓉𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒 𝒾𝑔𝓊𝒶𝓁𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝒸𝒽𝑒𝑔𝒶𝓇, 𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓈𝑒 𝓉𝓇𝒶𝒹𝓊𝓏𝒾𝓇𝒶́ 𝓃𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝒻𝓇𝑜𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑒 𝓊𝓃𝒾𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒶𝓇𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝑒 𝓂𝓊𝓁𝓉𝒾𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒶𝓇𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶 𝒞𝒽𝒾𝓃𝒶 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓉𝒶𝓇𝒹𝒶𝓇𝒶́ 𝑒𝓂 𝓈𝑒 𝒿𝓊𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓇.

𝒪 𝓂𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑜 𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒹𝑜 𝒶𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒𝓈𝓈𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶 𝓊𝓂𝒶 𝓇𝓊𝓉𝓊𝓇𝒶 𝓋𝒾𝑜𝓁𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶 𝒸𝑜𝓂 𝑜 𝓅𝒶𝓈𝓈𝒶𝒹𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝒸𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒, 𝒸𝓊𝒿𝑜 𝓅𝑜𝒹𝑒𝓇 𝓈𝑒 𝒶𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝓋𝒶 𝓉𝑒𝓃𝒹𝑒𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓁𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝑔𝓁𝑜𝒷𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓉𝒶. 𝒩𝑜 𝒻𝓊𝓃𝒹𝑜, 𝓇𝑒𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶 𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒𝒷𝓇𝒶 𝒹𝒶 𝓊𝓃𝒾𝓅𝑜𝓁𝒶𝓇𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 ℰ.𝒰.𝒜./𝒩𝒜𝒯𝒪/𝒰𝓃𝒾𝒶̃𝑜 ℰ𝓊𝓇𝑜𝓅𝑒𝒾𝒶 𝒶𝓉𝓇𝒶𝓋𝑒́𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝒶𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓃𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝒹𝑒 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒹𝓊𝒶𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓉𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓈, 𝒹𝑒 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒹𝑜𝒾𝓈 𝓃𝑜𝓋𝑜𝓈 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜𝓈, 𝑜 𝓇𝓊𝓈𝓈𝑜 𝑒 𝑜 𝒸𝒽𝒾𝓃𝑒̂𝓈, 𝒸𝒶𝒹𝒶 𝓋𝑒𝓏 𝓂𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝒻𝑜𝓇𝓉𝑒𝓈 𝑒 𝒸𝒶𝓅𝒶𝓏𝑒𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝓇𝒾𝓋𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓏𝒶𝓇 𝓃𝒶 𝒹𝒾𝓈𝓅𝓊𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝑒 𝓂𝒶𝓉𝑒́𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓈-𝓅𝓇𝒾𝓂𝒶𝓈, 𝒹𝑒 𝓋𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓂𝓊𝓃𝒾𝒸𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒 𝓂𝑒𝒸𝒶𝓃𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜𝓈 𝒹𝑒 𝒾𝓃𝓉𝑒𝑔𝓇𝒶𝒸̧𝒶̃𝑜 𝓇𝑒𝑔𝒾𝑜𝓃𝒶𝒾𝓈 𝑒 𝓂𝑒𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝒾𝓃𝑒𝓃𝓉𝒶𝒾𝓈, 𝑒 𝒹𝑒 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓋𝑜𝓁𝓋𝒾𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝓉𝑒𝒸𝓃𝑜𝓁𝑜́𝑔𝒾𝒸𝑜 𝑒 𝓂𝒾𝓁𝒾𝓉𝒶𝓇.

ℰ𝓈𝓅𝑒𝓇𝑒𝓂𝑜𝓈 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝒶 𝒾𝓃𝓋𝒶𝓈𝒶̃𝑜 𝑒 𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝓃𝒶 𝒰𝒸𝓇𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒶 𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓂𝒾𝓃𝑒𝓂 𝒷𝓇𝑒𝓋𝑒 𝑒 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓃𝒶̃𝑜 𝓈𝑒𝒿𝒶𝓂 𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓁𝓊́𝒹𝒾𝑜 𝒹𝒶 ℐℐℐ 𝒢𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 ℳ𝓊𝓃𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓁, 𝒹𝑒 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓈𝑒𝓆𝓊𝑒̂𝓃𝒸𝒾𝒶𝓈 𝒾𝓃𝒾𝓂𝒶𝑔𝒾𝓃𝒶́𝓋𝑒𝒾𝓈. 𝒩𝑜 𝓅𝓇𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑒 𝓂𝑜𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜 𝑜 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓈𝑒 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑜̃𝑒 𝑒́ 𝒶 𝓅𝒶𝓇𝒶𝑔𝑒𝓂 𝒹𝑜𝓈 𝒷𝑜𝓂𝒷𝒶𝓇𝒹𝑒𝒶𝓂𝑒𝓃𝓉𝑜𝓈 𝑒 𝒶 𝓇𝑒𝓉𝒾𝓇𝒶𝒹𝒶 𝒾𝓂𝑒𝒹𝒾𝒶𝓉𝒶 𝒹𝒶𝓈 𝓉𝓇𝑜𝓅𝒶𝓈 𝓇𝓊𝓈𝓈𝒶𝓈 𝒹𝒶 𝒰𝒸𝓇𝒶̂𝓃𝒾𝒶. ℋ𝒶́ 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓇𝑒𝒸𝓇𝓊𝒹𝑒𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓇 𝒶 𝓁𝓊𝓉𝒶 𝑔𝓁𝑜𝒷𝒶𝓁 𝒸𝑜𝓃𝓉𝓇𝒶 𝒶 𝑔𝓊𝑒𝓇𝓇𝒶 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝑜 𝒾𝓂𝓅𝑒𝓇𝒾𝒶𝓁𝒾𝓈𝓂𝑜 𝑔𝑒𝓇𝒶, 𝒽𝒶́ 𝓆𝓊𝑒 𝓅𝓇𝑜𝓂𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇 𝒶 𝒻𝓇𝒶𝓉𝑒𝓇𝓃𝒾𝒹𝒶𝒹𝑒 𝑒𝓃𝓉𝓇𝑒 𝑜𝓈 𝓅𝑜𝓋𝑜𝓈.

* Professor, Mestre em História

IN "ESQUERDA" - 08/02/22 . .

 .



2921.UNIÃO


EUROPEIA


COMISSÃO EUROPEIA
Timmermans apresenta plano
para reduzir drasticamente 
importações de gás russo



* Calma, é só fumaça!


FONTE:   AFP Português.

putin  HUYLO

putin é um canalha

.
.

luɽɑ ɗɑ ƥsɩ
96 - CᥲtᥲρꙆᥱxɩᥲ x CᥲtᥲꙆᥱρ⳽ɩᥲ x Cᥲtᥲtoᥒɩᥲ


FONTE:Universo da Psicologia TV

.
83-HORIZONTES DA MEMÓRIA
83.4- A Cidade da História-
-Santarém


* O professor José Hermano Saraiva era uma personalidade exímia em encantar-nos, aqui fica a "memória" da nossa saudade.

.

.

6-LUCY
O fóssil que reescreveu  
a história da humanidade 




FONTE:   DW Português para África.

 

 𝓐 𝓜𝓪𝓲𝓸𝓻 𝓕𝓵𝓸𝓻 𝓭𝓸 𝓜𝓾𝓷𝓭𝓸

 𝗝𝗢𝗦𝗘́ 𝗦𝗔𝗥𝗔𝗠𝗔𝗚𝗢

14- Q̷A̷T̷A̷R̷



* Leitura por estudantes na Embaixada de Portugal em Doha 

 FONTE: Camões I.P.

 * A nossa modesta homenagem a JOSÉ SARAMAGO .

 .

RICARDO ARAÚJO PEREIRA

𝗜𝘀𝘁𝗼 𝗲́ 𝗴𝗼𝘇𝗮𝗿 𝗰𝗼𝗺 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗺 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗵𝗮!


FONTE:   Carlos Brás.



Ⲥⲟⲛ⳽ⳙⲙⲟ 𝖽ⲉ ⲥⲇ⳨ⲉ́ ⲛⲟ ⲙⳙⲛ𝖽ⲟ

FONTE:la Vida en un Gráfico

 .

NÃO TEMOS A CERTEZA

MAS NÃO NOS ESPANTA

SE FOR VERDADE


putin  HUYLO

putin é um canalha

.

. 2999
Senso d'hoje
VOLODYMYR ZELENSKY
PRESIDENTE DA UCRÂNIA
DISCURSO PARA O
PARLAMENTO BRITÂNICO
"Não desistiremos e não perderemos"



FONTE:  CNN Brasil.

119-CINEMA
FORA "D'ORAS"


𝒳𝒱-ᥲ ɾᥱʋoꙆᥙᥴ̧ᥲ̃o ᑯᥱ ຕᥲɩo


𝑆𝐼𝑁𝑂𝑃𝑆𝐸:

𝑇𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑑𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑠 𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑎́𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑜 - 𝑒, 𝑚𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒, 𝑜 𝑢́𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜 - 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜́𝑔𝑖𝑐𝑎 𝑓𝑒𝑖𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜: 𝑛𝑒𝑙𝑒, 𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑔𝑒𝑚 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑙, 𝑢𝑚 𝘩𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑚 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑐̧𝑜̃𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑥𝑜𝑛𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑠𝑒𝑛𝘩𝑜𝑟𝑎 𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑎 𝑎̀ 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑜𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑖𝑎 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑑𝑎 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝟸𝟾 𝑑𝑒 𝑀𝑎𝑖𝑜. 𝐷𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑎-𝑠𝑒 𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎̃𝑜 𝑢𝑚𝑎 𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑒́𝑐𝑖𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑏𝑒𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑜 𝑚𝑎𝑙, 𝑖.𝑒., 𝑑𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑖𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑧𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎 𝑎𝑠 𝑑𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑚𝑜. 𝑁𝑜 𝑓𝑖𝑚, 𝑜 𝘩𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝑎𝑏𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑏𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑟 𝑜𝑠 𝑠𝑒𝑢𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑔𝑜𝑠 𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑠 𝑑𝑒 𝑣𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑎 𝑒 𝑎𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑐̧𝑎𝑟 𝑎 𝑐𝑎𝑢𝑠𝑎 𝑑𝑒 𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑧𝑎𝑟. 𝑂 𝑓𝑖𝑙𝑚𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑖 𝑓𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑝𝑒𝑙𝑜 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑒 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑎𝑔𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑎 𝑁𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜́𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝐹𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜.



ELENCO:

𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎 - 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎 𝐶𝑙𝑎𝑟𝑎
𝐸𝑚𝑖́𝑙𝑖𝑎 𝐷'𝑂𝑙𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎 - 𝐽𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑎, 𝑎 𝑚𝑎̃𝑒
𝐴𝑙𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑟𝑒 𝑑𝑒 𝐴𝑧𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑑𝑜 - 𝐶𝘩𝑒𝑓𝑒 𝑀𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑎
𝐴𝑛𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑜 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑖́𝑛𝑒𝑧 - 𝐶𝑒́𝑠𝑎𝑟 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 / 𝑀𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑒𝑙 𝐹𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑠
𝐶𝑙𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑒 𝑃𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 - 𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑠
𝐹𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑖𝑠𝑐𝑜 𝑅𝑖𝑏𝑒𝑖𝑟𝑜 - 𝐵𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑎
𝑅𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑎 𝑆𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑜 - 𝐸𝑙𝑎 𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑚𝑎

A Revolução de Maio (1937) - IMDb


FONTE:Paulo Borges