𝙾𝚜 𝚗𝚞́𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚊 𝙵𝙰𝙾 - 𝙾𝚛𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚣𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝙽𝚊𝚌̧𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚄𝚗𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝙰𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎 𝙰𝚐𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊 - 𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝟸𝟼% 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚘̃𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚋𝚘𝚗𝚘 𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚊𝚖 𝚍𝚊 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊. 𝚂𝚎 𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚛𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚎 𝚘 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚎, 𝚊 𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚚𝚞𝚒𝚊 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝟹𝟺%. 𝙴́ 𝚖𝚞𝚒𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚜𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚗𝚊, 𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚞𝚍𝚘 𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚘 (𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚎𝚜, 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚐𝚎́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚎 𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚕, 𝚎𝚝𝚌.) 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚎 𝟼𝟼%.
𝙾𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚘 𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚎: 𝟻𝟶% 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚘 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚒́𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚗𝚘 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊́ 𝚍𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚊̀ 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚒́𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚊 𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚕. 𝙰 𝚘𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚎́ 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚙𝚘𝚛 𝚏𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜 (𝟹𝟽%), 𝚟𝚎𝚐𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 (𝟷𝟷%), 𝚎 𝚊́𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚞𝚒́𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚎 𝚕𝚊𝚐𝚘𝚜 (𝟷% 𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚊). 𝙴 𝚜𝚎 𝟻𝟶% 𝚎́ 𝚜𝚒𝚐𝚗𝚒𝚏𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚘, 𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚊́𝚐𝚞𝚊 𝚎́ 𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚊 𝚜𝚞𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚛: 𝟽𝟶% 𝚍𝚘 𝚝𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚗𝚞𝚊𝚕 𝚗𝚘 𝚙𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚎𝚝𝚊. 𝙴𝚖 𝚌𝚒𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚘, 𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚒́𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚊 𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚕 𝚎𝚞𝚝𝚛𝚘𝚏𝚒𝚣𝚊 (𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚗𝚊 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚘́𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚊) 𝟽𝟾% 𝚍𝚊 𝚊́𝚐𝚞𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚌𝚒𝚛𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚊 𝚎𝚖 𝚋𝚊𝚛𝚛𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚜 𝚎 𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚜, 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚚𝚞𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚞𝚜𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜.
𝙵𝚊𝚣𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎́ 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚌𝚘 𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚗𝚘𝚞-𝚜𝚎 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚒́𝚟𝚎𝚕. 𝙲𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚒𝚛 𝚕𝚘𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎, 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚊 𝚎́𝚙𝚘𝚌𝚊 𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚛 𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚖 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚒́𝚟𝚎𝚕, 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚛 𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚒𝚛𝚊 𝚘𝚙𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚏𝚊𝚣𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚊𝚜. 𝙼𝚊𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚖 𝚍𝚞́𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚊 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚘𝚜𝚘 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘𝚊𝚜 𝚎́ 𝚘 𝚍𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚎𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚘́𝚐𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚗𝚎. 𝙴, 𝚍𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚘, 𝚜𝚎𝚖 𝚊𝚕𝚐𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚌̧𝚊 𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚘, 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚖𝚞𝚍𝚊.
𝙰 𝚛𝚊𝚣𝚊̃𝚘 𝚎́ 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊: 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘 𝚟𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝟻𝟶% 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚘 𝚑𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚝𝚊́𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚍𝚊 𝚃𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊́ 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚎 𝚊̀ 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊, 𝚏𝚊𝚕𝚝𝚊 𝚊𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝟽𝟽% 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚘 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊́ 𝚍𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚊̀ 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚗𝚎, 𝚕𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚒́𝚗𝚒𝚘𝚜, 𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚜 - 𝚎 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚋𝚘𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝚎 𝚊𝚟𝚒́𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚊. 𝙾𝚞 𝚜𝚎𝚓𝚊, 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚜𝚎 𝟺/𝟻 𝚍𝚘 𝚝𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚕. 𝙲𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚒𝚜, 𝚕𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚊𝚜, 𝚟𝚎𝚐𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚎 𝚏𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚘𝚌𝚞𝚙𝚊𝚖 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝟸𝟹% 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚘 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚊𝚍𝚘 𝚐𝚕𝚘𝚋𝚊𝚕. 𝙽𝚘 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘, 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎-𝚜𝚎: 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚊𝚛 𝚍𝚎 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝟽𝟽% 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚘𝚕𝚘 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚒́𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚊, 𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚌̧𝚊̃𝚘 𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚕 𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝟷𝟾% 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚎 𝟹𝟽% 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚒́𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚍𝚞𝚣𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎. 𝙴𝚖 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚘, 𝚘𝚜 (𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚜) 𝟸𝟹% 𝚍𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚊 𝚘𝚗𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚞𝚕𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚊𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚘𝚜 "𝚏𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚘𝚜" 𝚎 𝚐𝚛𝚊̃𝚘𝚜 𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝟾𝟸% 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚎 𝟼𝟹% 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚒́𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚍𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚘 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚘.
𝙳𝚊𝚚𝚞𝚒 𝚜𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚕𝚞𝚒 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚛𝚖𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚍𝚊 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎, 𝚜𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚞𝚍𝚘 𝚎𝚖 𝚙𝚊𝚒́𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎𝚜, 𝚟𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚒𝚜, 𝚕𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚊𝚜, 𝚏𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚎 𝚟𝚎𝚐𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚜 - 𝚜𝚎𝚖 𝚘𝚋𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚜𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 (𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚘-𝚜𝚎, 𝚘𝚋𝚟𝚒𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎, 𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚜𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚑𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚊𝚒́𝚜𝚎𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚜).
𝚀𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚘 𝚙𝚎𝚒𝚡𝚎, 𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚞𝚖𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚘𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊́𝚐𝚒𝚘𝚜 (𝚌𝚊𝚟𝚊𝚕𝚊, 𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚞 𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚑𝚊), 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚕𝚘𝚌𝚊𝚒𝚜, 𝚎́ 𝚊 𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚞𝚍𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚞𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊́𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚚𝚞𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚘𝚜 𝚛𝚎𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚑𝚘𝚜. 𝙱𝚘́𝚗𝚞𝚜: 𝚗𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊̃𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚜 𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚑𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚗𝚒́𝚟𝚎𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚎 𝚘́𝚖𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚜 𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚒́𝚗𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚒́𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚊𝚜 (𝚊𝚕𝚎́𝚖 𝚍𝚊𝚜 𝚊𝚕𝚐𝚊𝚜).
𝚃𝚘𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚜 𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚖 𝚊 𝚗𝚎𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚛 𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎̂𝚗𝚌𝚒𝚊 𝚏𝚊𝚌𝚎 𝚊̀ 𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚞́𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛, 𝚊𝚘 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚎 𝚎 𝚊𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚒́𝚌𝚒𝚘. 𝚂𝚎𝚖 𝚘 𝚏𝚊𝚣𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚘𝚜, 𝚌𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚞𝚖 𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚘 𝚍𝚞𝚙𝚕𝚘: 𝚖𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚌̧𝚊𝚜 𝚋𝚛𝚞𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚗𝚘 𝚌𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚊 𝚎 𝚘 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚘 𝚍𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚌𝚘𝚕𝚑𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚜, 𝚟𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚍𝚊𝚍𝚎 𝚍𝚎 𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚜, 𝚊́𝚐𝚞𝚊, 𝚊𝚕𝚎́𝚖 𝚍𝚎 𝚞𝚖 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚖 𝚝𝚎𝚖 𝚘𝚞 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚊𝚌𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚊 𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚜. 𝙰 𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚗𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚒𝚊 𝚎 𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚑𝚘 𝚑𝚞𝚖𝚊𝚗𝚘 𝚊𝚓𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚖 𝚊 𝚖𝚒𝚝𝚒𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚜, 𝚖𝚊𝚜 𝚘𝚜 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚜 𝚙𝚘𝚋𝚛𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚖 𝚜𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚛𝚎 𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚒𝚘𝚛 𝚏𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊. 𝚅𝚎𝚖𝚘𝚜 𝚒𝚜𝚜𝚘 𝚗𝚊 𝚙𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚊. 𝙽𝚞𝚖𝚊 𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚎 𝚌𝚕𝚒𝚖𝚊́𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊 𝚌𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎, 𝚊 𝚎𝚜𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚊 𝚍𝚘 𝚜𝚘𝚏𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚊́ 𝚒𝚗𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚘𝚛, 𝚌𝚘𝚖 𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌̧𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚚𝚞𝚎 𝚗𝚊̃𝚘 𝚑𝚊́ 𝚟𝚊𝚌𝚒𝚗𝚊 𝚍𝚎 𝚎𝚏𝚎𝚒𝚝𝚘 𝚒𝚖𝚎𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚝𝚘.