a peida é um regalo ... do nariz a gente trata: sábado, 22 de agosto de 2020

Traição

A ausência de democraticidade do nosso sistema político tem permitido que, crescentemente, os Governos em geral e este Governo do PS em particular se isolem no interior do castelo do poder.

𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗎𝗇𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗎 𝖽𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅, 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗁𝖺𝗆𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗁𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗏𝗈. 𝖠𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗎𝗌𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝖺 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂́𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗎𝗇𝗂𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗇.𝗈 𝟣 𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗋𝗍.𝗈 𝟣𝟦𝟩.𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖢𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗋 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗍𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗓 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗏𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆.

𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗈𝗌 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖲 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗌𝖾 𝗂𝗌𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗏𝗂𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗍𝗎𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾, 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝗉𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖺 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝗈, 𝗆𝗈𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖺𝗀𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗉𝖺𝗇𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋.

𝖳𝗈𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗎-𝗌𝖾, 𝖺𝗌𝗌𝗂𝗆, 𝗁𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝗀𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖿𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗆 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗎𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅. 𝖮 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝖼𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾̂ 𝖺𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝖽𝖾 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗅𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗂𝗏𝖺𝗌, 𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖺̃𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌. 𝖢𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗆, 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝗈𝗂𝗌, 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖺𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗌. 𝖣𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌: 𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖡𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖾 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖭𝗈𝗏𝗈 𝖡𝖺𝗇𝖼𝗈, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝗈 𝖡𝖤𝖲 𝖾 𝗇𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝗀𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅 𝗈𝗎 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝗀𝖾́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗋𝗂𝗊𝗎𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗂𝗌, 𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗀𝖾𝗇𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌.

𝖭𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝗀𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖺 𝖿𝖺́𝖻𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗁𝗂𝖽𝗋𝗈𝗀𝖾́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖲𝗂𝗇𝖾𝗌, 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖺𝗉𝖺𝖽𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈, 𝖺𝗍𝖾́ 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝗎𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈, 𝖿𝖺𝖼𝖾 𝖺̀ 𝗂𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝖼𝗇𝗈𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝖽𝖺, 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗎𝗆 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼̧𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌. 𝖠𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗂𝗇𝖽𝖺 𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌. 𝖠𝗅𝗂𝖺́𝗌, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗈𝗆 𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗌𝗈, 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖺-𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌, 𝗍𝖾́𝖼𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖩𝗈𝖺̃𝗈 𝖦𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖻𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗎𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗌𝖺𝖻𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝖺𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗈, 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗎𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗈𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗋𝗂́𝖼𝗎𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝗏𝗂𝖼̧𝗈 𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝗈.

𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝖼𝗅𝖺𝗋𝖾𝖼𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋, 𝗍𝖾𝗆𝗈𝗌 𝗈 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖺, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝖾𝗋 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗀𝗈 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗌𝖾 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖻𝖺𝗌𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗈𝖻𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗂𝗏𝗈𝗌, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗈𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗌𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖾𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗆 𝗋𝗈𝗍𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗌𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾̂ 𝖺𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖺̀𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺 – 𝖾, 𝖾𝗆 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖺𝗌𝗈𝗌, 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗋𝗈𝖼̧𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝖺𝖻𝗌𝗎𝗋𝖽𝗈. 𝖵𝖾𝗃𝖺𝗆𝗈𝗌:

𝟣 – 𝖤́ 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺, 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌, 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗆𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝖽𝖺𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎, 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝖻𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅. 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖺̀𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗇𝗂𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈, 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖺, 𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈. 𝖢𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗂́𝗏𝖾𝗅 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗀𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗅𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝖺𝗆𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗉𝗅𝖺𝗍𝖺𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗃𝖺́ 𝖾𝗑𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗇𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝖲𝗎𝗂́𝖼̧𝖺, 𝖺 𝖨𝗍𝖺́𝗅𝗂𝖺 𝖾 𝖺 𝖤𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺. 𝖠𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗂́𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝖽𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝖺𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝖤𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺.

𝟤 – 𝖮𝗌 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖥𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖥𝗈𝗓 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖺𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝗇𝖺 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖺 – 𝖢𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖠𝗍𝗅𝖺̂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 –, 𝖻𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗆 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝖴𝖨𝖢 𝗇𝖺 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗂𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗂́𝗌𝖾𝗌. 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝗌𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝗈𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗀𝗎𝗂𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖲𝗎𝗅 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝖯𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖢𝖺𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖩𝗈𝗌𝖾́ 𝖲𝗈́𝖼𝗋𝖺𝗍𝖾𝗌, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝖾, 𝗇𝗈 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖺𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈. 𝖮 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖯𝖲𝖣 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗈𝗎 𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗃𝖾𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝗌𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖾𝗆 𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖻𝗎𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝟣𝟧𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝖻𝖺𝗅𝗁𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗀𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝖺𝗍𝗎𝖺𝗅 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈.

𝟥 – 𝖮 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗇𝗎𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗂𝗎 𝖺 “𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈” 𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝖻𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖺𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝖻𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌. 𝖮𝗋𝖺, 𝗂𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖾́ 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗌𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗍𝖾́𝖼𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌, 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗌𝖻𝗈𝗋𝖽𝗈, 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗀𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝖿𝖾𝗀𝗈 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 – 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝖻𝗋𝗂𝗀𝖺 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝗁𝗈𝗋𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝖿𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗌 –, 𝗌𝖾𝗃𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝗍𝗈𝗍𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈. 𝖠 𝖠𝗎𝗍𝗈𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺 𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖺𝗇𝗈 𝖾 𝗍𝖾𝗏𝖾 𝖽𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗋. 𝖬𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝗉𝖺𝗅 𝖾́ 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗋𝖾𝖼̧𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖻𝖺𝗂𝗑𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗁𝖺𝗏𝖾𝗋𝖺́ 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗍𝗋𝖺́𝖿𝖾𝗀𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖼𝗂𝗋𝖼𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖺𝗅𝖾́𝗆 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗅𝗀𝗎𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗋𝖾𝗀𝗂𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖻𝗈𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅.

𝟦 – 𝖭𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖽𝗂𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝗇𝖾𝗇𝗁𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖺 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗀𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗏𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺́ 𝖾𝗆 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝗀𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝖺𝖼𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈 𝖺𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋𝖾𝗌 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗌, 𝖾 𝖺 𝖠𝗎𝗍𝗈𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖺 𝖯𝖲𝖠, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝗈𝗎𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗌, 𝗏𝖺𝗂 𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗏𝖺𝗅𝗂𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗌𝗎𝖺 𝗉𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺. 𝖠𝗅𝖾́𝗆, 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖽𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖽𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗌 𝗅𝗈𝗀𝗂́𝗌𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝗈́𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝗂𝗌𝗉𝗈𝗇𝗂𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗆 𝖾𝗆 𝖵𝗂𝗀𝗈, 𝖲𝖺𝗅𝖺𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖡𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗃𝗈𝗓 – 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝗈́𝗂𝗌 𝗊𝗎𝖾, 𝗇𝖺𝗍𝗎𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺 𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗉𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗋𝗋𝖺𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖠𝗇𝗍𝗈́𝗇𝗂𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝖺 𝗌𝖾𝗎 𝖿𝖺𝗏𝗈𝗋, 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖾 𝖾𝗅𝖾𝗍𝗋𝗂𝖿𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝗃𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝖻𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖾́, 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗎𝗆𝖺 𝖻𝖺𝗋𝗋𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝖺𝗌 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗋𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝖺 𝗅𝗂𝖻𝖾𝗋𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈. 𝖠𝗅𝗂𝖺́𝗌, 𝗈 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗂𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈 𝖯𝖾𝖽𝗋𝗈 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝖾𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗎 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝖻𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝗌𝖾 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗏𝖺 𝖺 𝖾𝗏𝗂𝗍𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾̂𝗇𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅.

𝟧 – 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺 𝗈𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈, 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖻𝖾𝗇𝖾𝖿𝗂𝖼𝗂𝖺 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗌𝗂𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗇𝖺𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖬𝖾𝖽𝗐𝖺𝗒 𝗇𝗈 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗋𝖼𝖺𝖽𝗈𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗌, 𝗈 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝗎 𝗎𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗃𝗎𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗋𝖺𝗌: (𝖺) 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾́ 𝗎𝗆 𝗉𝗋𝗈𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗆𝖺, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖾𝗑𝗉𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝗋𝖺𝗓𝖺̃𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝗋 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖤𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝖺 𝗃𝖺́ 𝗀𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝟤𝟢 𝗆𝗂𝗅 𝗆𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗎𝗌 𝖾 𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗋𝖼̧𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝗈 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖺; (𝖻) 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝗈́𝗂𝗌 𝗅𝖾𝗏𝖺𝗋𝖺̃𝗈 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝖺𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖺 𝖼𝗁𝖾𝗀𝖺𝗋 𝖺̀ 𝖿𝗋𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖺 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝖴𝖨𝖢, 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝖿𝗈𝗌𝗌𝖾 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗅 𝖺𝖼𝗈𝗋𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝖾𝗌𝗉𝖺𝗇𝗁𝗈́𝗂𝗌 𝖾/𝗈𝗎 𝖼𝗈𝗆 𝖡𝗋𝗎𝗑𝖾𝗅𝖺𝗌 𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖺𝗍𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌, 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝖿𝗈𝗋𝗆𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖥𝗂𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗂𝗋𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖥𝗈𝗓; (𝖼) 𝖺𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖿𝖺𝗅𝗌𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗁𝖺́ 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝗆𝗎𝖽𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝗈𝖽𝖺 𝖺 𝗋𝖾𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝖺 𝗇𝖺𝖼𝗂𝗈𝗇𝖺𝗅, 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝖺𝗎𝗌𝖺 𝖾́ 𝖺𝗉𝖾𝗇𝖺𝗌 𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖠𝗍𝗅𝖺̂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗀𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖺̀ 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖺; (𝖽) 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖺𝗅𝗊𝗎𝖾𝗋 𝗉𝗎𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝗌𝗈𝖻𝗋𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗆𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗎𝗋𝗌𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝗈 𝗌𝖾́𝖼. 𝗑𝗂𝗑 𝗈𝗎 𝖽𝖺𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗏𝖺𝗌 𝗅𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖺𝗌 𝖾𝗆 𝗏𝗂𝖺 𝗎́𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺, 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖺𝗌 𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗇𝖺𝗋 𝗍𝖾́𝖼𝗇𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖾 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝗏𝗂𝖺́𝗏𝖾𝗂𝗌; (𝖾) 𝖼𝗋𝗂𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝖺 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝗇𝖺̃𝗈 𝗍𝖾𝗆 𝖽𝗂𝗇𝗁𝖾𝗂𝗋𝗈 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝗂𝗋 𝗈 𝖢𝗈𝗋𝗋𝖾𝖽𝗈𝗋 𝖠𝗍𝗅𝖺̂𝗇𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈, 𝗆𝖺𝗌 𝗈𝗆𝗂𝗍𝗂𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝗈 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗈𝗋 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖼𝗈𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗍𝗈 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖻𝗌𝗂́𝖽𝗂𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝖺 𝖴𝗇𝗂𝖺̃𝗈 𝖤𝗎𝗋𝗈𝗉𝖾𝗂𝖺, 𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗋𝖾 𝟩𝟢% 𝖾 𝟪𝟢%, 𝗉𝖾𝗅𝗈 𝗋𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖿𝖾𝗋𝗋𝗈𝗏𝗂𝖺, 𝖾 𝗌𝖾𝗆 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗍𝖺𝖻𝗂𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝗋 𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗎𝗌𝗍𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝗇𝗎́𝗍𝖾𝗂𝗌 𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝖺 𝗆𝖺𝗇𝗎𝗍𝖾𝗇𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝗏𝖾𝗅𝗁𝖺 𝖻𝗂𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖺 𝗂𝖻𝖾́𝗋𝗂𝖼𝖺.

𝖤𝗆 𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗎𝗆𝗈, 𝗍𝖾𝗋𝗆𝗂𝗇𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝗈 𝖼𝗈𝗆𝖾𝖼𝖾𝗂. 𝖮𝗌 𝗉𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗅𝗂́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗂𝖼̧𝗈𝖺𝗋𝖺𝗆 𝗈𝗌 𝗂𝖽𝖾𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝗈𝗌 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌 𝖾 𝗈 𝖯𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝖽𝗈 𝖲𝗈𝖼𝗂𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗌𝗍𝖺, 𝗇𝗈 𝗉𝗈𝖽𝖾𝗋, 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖺́ 𝖺 𝖺𝗍𝗋𝖺𝗂𝖼̧𝗈𝖺𝗋 𝗈 𝖽𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗇𝗏𝗈𝗅𝗏𝗂𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗈 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈́𝗆𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖯𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝖺𝗅 𝖾 𝗈 𝖿𝗎𝗍𝗎𝗋𝗈 𝖽𝖺 𝖾𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗈𝗆𝗂𝖺 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖾 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗉𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗎𝗀𝗎𝖾𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝗇𝗈𝗌𝗌𝗈𝗌 𝖿𝗂𝗅𝗁𝗈𝗌 𝖾 𝗇𝖾𝗍𝗈𝗌, 𝖿𝖺𝗓𝖾𝗇𝖽𝗈-𝗈 𝗇𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝖿𝖾𝗌𝖺 𝖽𝖾 𝗂𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗌, 𝗆𝖺𝗂𝗌 𝗈𝗎 𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗈𝗌 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗁𝖾𝖼𝗂𝖽𝗈𝗌, 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗎𝗉𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖾 𝖽𝖺 𝖼𝗈𝗇𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗎𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝗎𝗆 𝖤𝗌𝗍𝖺𝖽𝗈 𝗈𝗆𝗇𝗂𝗉𝗈𝗍𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖾 𝖼𝗋𝖾𝗌𝖼𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾𝗆𝖾𝗇𝗍𝖾 𝖺𝗎𝗍𝗈𝗋𝗂𝗍𝖺́𝗋𝗂𝗈, 𝖾𝗆 𝗊𝗎𝖾 𝖺 𝖠𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗆𝖻𝗅𝖾𝗂𝖺 𝖽𝖺 𝖱𝖾𝗉𝗎́𝖻𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖺 𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗑𝗈𝗎 𝗁𝖺́ 𝗆𝗎𝗂𝗍𝗈 𝖽𝖾 𝖼𝗎𝗆𝗉𝗋𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝗌 𝗌𝗎𝖺𝗌 𝖿𝗎𝗇𝖼̧𝗈̃𝖾𝗌 𝖽𝖾𝗆𝗈𝖼𝗋𝖺́𝗍𝗂𝖼𝖺𝗌 𝖽𝖾 𝖿𝗂𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗅𝗂𝗓𝖺𝖼̧𝖺̃𝗈 𝖽𝗈𝗌 𝖦𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗇𝗈𝗌.

* Empresário - Subscritor do “Manifesto: Por Uma Democracia de Qualidade”

IN "i" 21/08/20